From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] OMAP4: hwmod: Disable hardware-controlled idle for GPT1
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:57:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c47364db2da7c8bcec3e21463f001fe@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1103100744500.15132@utopia.booyaka.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul@pwsan.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 8:15 PM
> To: Santosh Shilimkar
> Cc: Benoit Cousson; Rajendra Nayak; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Kevin Hilman
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] OMAP4: hwmod: Disable hardware-controlled idle
> for GPT1
>
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>
> > We continued further debug on the static dependency issues with
> > OMAP4 PM series.
> > So far from the findings what I have, this timer patch is actually
> not
> > needed and can be dropped. Infact the patch is not really
> effective
> > because current timer driver(not hwmod adapted yet) puts timer1
> > in smart idle again.
> >
> > There is another static dep. just like MPUSS<-->EMIF seems to
> create
> > an issue. The lock-up is not very consistently reproducible so
> it's
> > very easy to get miss-leading results. Timer patch was one of
> those
> > observations. With or without timer patch I can reproduce the hang
> > with long duration test.
> >
> > Will keep narrowing down the next offending static dependency but
> > in mean time I suggest you to drop this patch.
>
> Okay, dropped.
>
Managed to narrow down the issue with below two offender.
1) MPUSS <--> MEMIF_STATDEP
2) MPUSS <--> L3_1_STATDEP
If we keep both of these static deps, then I don't see any
issues. Will give a overnight run to check the stability.
Will update the below patch to include L3_1 CD and
repost the same.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/620351/
Regards
Santosh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] OMAP4: hwmod: Disable hardware-controlled idle for GPT1
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:57:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c47364db2da7c8bcec3e21463f001fe@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1103100744500.15132@utopia.booyaka.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul at pwsan.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 8:15 PM
> To: Santosh Shilimkar
> Cc: Benoit Cousson; Rajendra Nayak; linux-omap at vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; Kevin Hilman
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] OMAP4: hwmod: Disable hardware-controlled idle
> for GPT1
>
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>
> > We continued further debug on the static dependency issues with
> > OMAP4 PM series.
> > So far from the findings what I have, this timer patch is actually
> not
> > needed and can be dropped. Infact the patch is not really
> effective
> > because current timer driver(not hwmod adapted yet) puts timer1
> > in smart idle again.
> >
> > There is another static dep. just like MPUSS<-->EMIF seems to
> create
> > an issue. The lock-up is not very consistently reproducible so
> it's
> > very easy to get miss-leading results. Timer patch was one of
> those
> > observations. With or without timer patch I can reproduce the hang
> > with long duration test.
> >
> > Will keep narrowing down the next offending static dependency but
> > in mean time I suggest you to drop this patch.
>
> Okay, dropped.
>
Managed to narrow down the issue with below two offender.
1) MPUSS <--> MEMIF_STATDEP
2) MPUSS <--> L3_1_STATDEP
If we keep both of these static deps, then I don't see any
issues. Will give a overnight run to check the stability.
Will update the below patch to include L3_1 CD and
repost the same.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/620351/
Regards
Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-10 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-10 1:48 [PATCH] OMAP4: hwmod: Disable hardware-controlled idle for GPT1 Paul Walmsley
2011-03-10 1:48 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-03-10 8:45 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-03-10 8:45 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-03-10 14:37 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-03-10 14:37 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-03-10 14:45 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-03-10 14:45 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-03-10 16:27 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2011-03-10 16:27 ` Santosh Shilimkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9c47364db2da7c8bcec3e21463f001fe@mail.gmail.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.