Re: xen_version hypercall

Re: xen_version hypercall

[Mark Williamson]

> at the moment, xen_version hypercall returns only xen-version and
> xen-subversion (as a long number). but there is xen-extraversion. so i
> wonder if it is better for this hypercall to returns also
> extraversion? (so the return value is a string, not a number)

Hmmmm.  Well the xen_version hypercall is used for OSes to determine the ABI 
of the version of Xen they're running on (I think), so it kinda makes sense 
for that to be a long.

For your xm info updates my personal preference would be to leave the version 
hypercall the same and to fetch the additional details with a new dom0 op in 
the common directory (would anyone have a problem with this?).

The additional info would ideally allow the whole Xen version string to be 
pieced together, as displayed at boot e.g.

"Xen version 3.0-devel (mwilli2@) (gcc version 3.4.2 20041017 (Red Hat 
3.4.2-6.fc3)) Mon May 16 15:12:17 BST 2005"
(like uname -a)

Or a subset of that info.

What do you think?

Cheers,
Mark

> regards,
> aq
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

xen_version hypercall

[aq]

hello,

at the moment, xen_version hypercall returns only xen-version and
xen-subversion (as a long number). but there is xen-extraversion. so i
wonder if it is better for this hypercall to returns also
extraversion? (so the return value is a string, not a number)

regards,
aq

Re: xen_version hypercall

[Keir Fraser]

On 4 Jun 2005, at 14:34, Mark Williamson wrote:

>
> The additional info would ideally allow the whole Xen version string 
> to be
> pieced together, as displayed at boot e.g.
>
> "Xen version 3.0-devel (mwilli2@) (gcc version 3.4.2 20041017 (Red Hat
> 3.4.2-6.fc3)) Mon May 16 15:12:17 BST 2005"
> (like uname -a)
>
> Or a subset of that info.
>
> What do you think?

xen_version() takes a command parameter. We can extend the comamnd 
enumeration (currently the command is always == 0) to be abel to find 
out other interesting stuff.

  -- Keir

Re: xen_version hypercall

[aq]

On 6/4/05, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> On 4 Jun 2005, at 14:34, Mark Williamson wrote:
> 
> >
> > The additional info would ideally allow the whole Xen version string
> > to be
> > pieced together, as displayed at boot e.g.
> >
> > "Xen version 3.0-devel (mwilli2@) (gcc version 3.4.2 20041017 (Red Hat
> > 3.4.2-6.fc3)) Mon May 16 15:12:17 BST 2005"
> > (like uname -a)
> >
> > Or a subset of that info.
> >
> > What do you think?
> 
> xen_version() takes a command parameter. We can extend the comamnd
> enumeration (currently the command is always == 0) to be abel to find
> out other interesting stuff.
> 

yes, i think this solution is cleaner than extending dom0-ops. i will
work on it to let it returns extraversion when id=1 first.

any other information we need, beside extraversion?

regards,
aq