Re: [PATCH V1 2/4] scsi: ufs: qcom: dt-bindings: Add UFSHC compatible for Hamoa

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Pradeep P V K <pradeep.pragallapati@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	vkoul@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org,
	krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, andersson@kernel.org,
	konradybcio@kernel.org, taniya.das@oss.qualcomm.com,
	dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, nitin.rawat@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 2/4] scsi: ufs: qcom: dt-bindings: Add UFSHC compatible for Hamoa
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 08:13:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d3c21ad-c265-4e22-b804-ef8c39b7e787@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251229060642.2807165-3-pradeep.pragallapati@oss.qualcomm.com>

On 29/12/2025 07:06, Pradeep P V K wrote:
> Document the UFSHC compatible for Qualcomm Hamoa SoC. Use fallback
> to indicate the compatibility of UFSHC on Hamoa with that on the
> SM8550.

Same problem.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Pradeep P V K <pradeep.pragallapati@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml          | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml
> index d94ef4e6b85a..3b5a95db7831 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml

That's older devices binding. Why would Hamoa fit here?

Best regards,
Krzysztof