From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
Linux/PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@gmail.com>,
Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PPC32] ADMA support for PPC 440SPe processors.
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:38:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9db80aa3f81b1c7fa6e7bb761b7642a3@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0703221419280.7246@pademelon.sonytel.be>
>> That sounds nice. There are slightly fewer things called
>> SPU than there are called SPE I imagine? Or is it just a
>> historical misnomer.
>
> AFAIK SPE is the preferred name, as the SPU is only a part of the SPE.
> That's what I was told.
And you were told right. I was trying to be sarcastic
here, but you missed it. Don't worry, it wasn't aimed
at you anyway ;-)
Segher
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
Linux/PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PPC32] ADMA support for PPC 440SPe processors.
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:38:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9db80aa3f81b1c7fa6e7bb761b7642a3@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0703221419280.7246@pademelon.sonytel.be>
>> That sounds nice. There are slightly fewer things called
>> SPU than there are called SPE I imagine? Or is it just a
>> historical misnomer.
>
> AFAIK SPE is the preferred name, as the SPU is only a part of the SPE.
> That's what I was told.
And you were told right. I was trying to be sarcastic
here, but you missed it. Don't worry, it wasn't aimed
at you anyway ;-)
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-22 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-15 23:29 [PATCH] [PPC32] ADMA support for PPC 440SPe processors Wolfgang Denk
2007-03-16 5:27 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-03-16 5:27 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-03-16 5:55 ` Dan Williams
2007-03-16 5:55 ` Dan Williams
2007-03-16 10:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-03-16 10:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-03-16 16:33 ` Dan Williams
2007-03-16 16:33 ` Dan Williams
2007-03-16 8:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-03-16 8:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-03-16 10:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-03-16 10:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-03-16 12:44 ` Stefan Roese
2007-03-16 16:57 ` Dan Williams
2007-03-16 16:57 ` Dan Williams
2007-03-16 18:00 ` Dan Williams
2007-03-16 18:00 ` Dan Williams
2007-03-17 8:09 ` Stefan Roese
2007-03-17 8:09 ` Stefan Roese
2007-03-17 18:17 ` Dan Williams
2007-03-17 18:17 ` Dan Williams
2007-03-17 18:43 ` Stefan Roese
2007-03-17 18:43 ` Stefan Roese
2007-03-17 19:09 ` Dan Williams
2007-03-17 19:09 ` Dan Williams
2007-03-19 16:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-03-19 16:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-03-20 3:06 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-03-20 3:06 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-03-20 5:39 ` Stefan Roese
2007-03-20 5:39 ` Stefan Roese
2007-03-21 14:10 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-03-21 14:10 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-03-21 19:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-03-21 19:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-03-21 20:03 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-03-21 20:03 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-03-22 11:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-03-22 11:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-03-22 12:36 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-03-22 12:36 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-03-22 13:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-03-22 13:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-03-22 13:38 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2007-03-22 13:38 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-03-17 8:57 ` Yuri Tikhonov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9db80aa3f81b1c7fa6e7bb761b7642a3@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=sr@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.