All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 5] support of NUMA topology in xl
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:50:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <C9315364.D34F%keir@xen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19723.41436.419700.193126@mariner.uk.xensource.com>

On 17/12/2010 17:46, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:

> Juergen Gross writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] support of NUMA topology
> in xl"):
>> any reason you didn't apply my series up to now?
>> Did I miss any objection?
> 
> No, there is no problem with your series.  However, our tests are
> failing a lot and I wanted to wait until we have a test pass and a
> push before dumping a lot more stuff into xen-unstable.
> 
> So I'm holding off on your series as well as a few others.
> 
> Keir, it would be nice if we could try to restrict stuff going into
> xen-unstable to obvious bugfixes, for a bit.
> 
> I suggest that our rule for the end-of-December freeze should be that
> patches which were posted in their final form or something very like
> it by (say) Christmas Eve should go into 4.1, even if we have held off
> actually committing them until early January.
> 
> Alternatively I can throw everything in now and try to fix it up later
> but it does make it harder to pin down what went wrong when things
> break.

That sounds okay. I have nothing in my queue to be applied now anyway.

 -- Keir

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-17 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-09 12:39 [PATCH 0 of 5] support of NUMA topology in xl Juergen Gross
2010-12-09 12:39 ` [PATCH 1 of 5] Support getting topology info in libxl Juergen Gross
2010-12-09 13:11   ` Gianni Tedesco
2010-12-09 13:19     ` Juergen Gross
2010-12-10 17:30       ` Ian Jackson
2010-12-09 12:39 ` [PATCH 2 of 5] support topolgy info in xl info Juergen Gross
2010-12-09 12:39 ` [PATCH 3 of 5] Extend cpupools to support numa Juergen Gross
2010-12-09 12:39 ` [PATCH 4 of 5] Support renaming of cpupools Juergen Gross
2010-12-09 12:39 ` [PATCH 5 of 5] Support new xl command cpupool-numa-split Juergen Gross
2010-12-17  6:09 ` [PATCH 0 of 5] support of NUMA topology in xl Juergen Gross
2010-12-17 17:46   ` Ian Jackson
2010-12-17 17:50     ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2010-12-17 21:42     ` [PATCH] xl: fix compilation warning on libxl.c Wei Huang
2010-12-23  2:08       ` [PATCH] fix build error in libxl Zhang, Yang Z
2011-01-03 13:40         ` Christoph Egger
2011-01-05 23:39           ` [PATCH] xl: fix compilation warning on libxl.c [and 2 more messages] Ian Jackson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-09 10:51 [PATCH 0 of 5] support of NUMA topology in xl Juergen Gross
2010-12-09 12:29 ` Ian Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=C9315364.D34F%keir@xen.org \
    --to=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.