From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
To: "Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: "Qiu, Shuang" <shuang.qiu@intel.com>,
"Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: use tasklet to handle init/sipi?
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 07:38:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CD7700FD.1BBCE%keir.xen@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A9667DDFB95DB7438FA9D7D576C3D87E099F2122@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 26/03/2013 07:17, "Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
>>> Oh, I see. Well I think it is fine to have
>>> vlapic_schedule_init_sipi_tasklet() return X86EMUL_OKAY rather than
>>> X86EMUL_RETRY. We used to need to return RETRY, but the code got simplified
>>> and now it is actually unnecessary.
>>>
>>> That should make your patch a lot simpler eh? ;)
>>
>> Given that you ignore the return code on the apicv call path, is there
>> currently a bug at all for you? Seems what is there already must work
>> for you?
> It do cause bug after we change to use seabios. For seabios, it will send
> INIT/SIPI to all vcpus via broadcasting. And there only one vcpu is waken up
> via tasklet with current logic. That's the reason why I want to wakeup all
> vcpus on one callback.
> Just change X86EMUL_RETRY to OK cannot solve the problem. still need the logic
> I mentioned above.
Ok, wait a sec, I will sort out a patch for you to try...
-- Keir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-26 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-25 5:31 use tasklet to handle init/sipi? Zhang, Yang Z
2013-03-25 6:29 ` Keir Fraser
2013-03-25 6:55 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-03-25 8:05 ` Keir Fraser
2013-03-25 12:16 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-03-25 12:38 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-25 12:39 ` Keir Fraser
2013-03-26 3:15 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-03-26 6:07 ` Keir Fraser
2013-03-26 6:14 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-03-26 7:00 ` Keir Fraser
2013-03-26 7:11 ` Keir Fraser
2013-03-26 7:17 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-03-26 7:38 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2013-03-26 7:41 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-03-26 7:55 ` Keir Fraser
2013-03-26 8:02 ` Keir Fraser
2013-03-28 1:18 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2013-03-28 6:39 ` Qiu, Shuang
2013-03-28 11:48 ` Keir Fraser
2013-03-28 15:29 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-28 20:02 ` Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CD7700FD.1BBCE%keir.xen@gmail.com \
--to=keir.xen@gmail.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=shuang.qiu@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=xiantao.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.