Re: [PATCH RESEND] hooks: add sendemail-validate-series

["Robin Jarry" <robin@jarry.cc>]

Junio C Hamano, Apr 04, 2023 at 00:52:
> Close to zero is very different from absolutely zero, and in the
> case of format-patch generated patches, I think it is absolutely
> zero.  At least, that was the case back when I designed and
> implemented it, and I do not think I accepted a patch to break it
> over the years.
>
> But "git send-email" can be fed a list of files and even a directory
> (and enumerate files in it).  The filenames are under end-users'
> control in this case, so "close to zero" has absolutely no relevance.
> If the end user means to feed you such a file, they can do so 100%
> of the time.

Ok that's a fair point. Even though I am having a hard time believing
someone would do such a thing :D

> If we support such a file is a different issue.  A good rule of
> thumb to decide if it is reasonable is to see if the main command
> already works with such filenames, e.g.
>
>     $ git format-patch -2
>     0001-foo.txt
>     0002-bar.txt
>     $ mv 0001-foo.txt '0001-fo
>     > o.txt'
>     $ mkdir dir
>     $ mv 000[12]*.txt dir/.
>
> may prepare two patch files that can be sent via send-email.  One
> file (the first one) is deliberately given a filename with LF in
> it.  Does send-email work on it correctly if you did e.g.
>
>     $ git send-email dir/000[12]*.txt
>
> or something silly like
>
>     $ git send-email dir
>
> or does it already choke on the first file because of the filename?

It seems to work with both. I guess, NUL bytes separation it is then...