All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 24/29] powerpc: interrupt tests
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 19:58:45 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CXURVO6COZBK.2YISETA5D0C2@wheely> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <feab6612-31f6-41bd-8ee9-89a19aa0e76c@redhat.com>

On Tue Dec 19, 2023 at 11:57 PM AEST, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 16/12/2023 14.42, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > Add basic testing of various kinds of interrupts, machine check,
> > page fault, illegal, decrementer, trace, syscall, etc.
> > 
> > This has a known failure on QEMU TCG pseries machines where MSR[ME]
> > can be incorrectly set to 0.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >   lib/powerpc/asm/ppc_asm.h |  21 +-
> >   powerpc/Makefile.common   |   3 +-
> >   powerpc/interrupts.c      | 422 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   powerpc/unittests.cfg     |   3 +
> >   4 files changed, 445 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >   create mode 100644 powerpc/interrupts.c
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/powerpc/asm/ppc_asm.h b/lib/powerpc/asm/ppc_asm.h
> > index ef2d91dd..778e78ee 100644
> > --- a/lib/powerpc/asm/ppc_asm.h
> > +++ b/lib/powerpc/asm/ppc_asm.h
> > @@ -35,17 +35,32 @@
> >   
> >   #endif /* __BYTE_ORDER__ */
> >   
> > +#define SPR_DSISR	0x012
> > +#define SPR_DAR		0x013
> > +#define SPR_DEC		0x016
> > +#define SPR_SRR0	0x01A
> > +#define SPR_SRR1	0x01B
> > +#define SPR_FSCR	0x099
> > +#define   FSCR_PREFIX	0x2000
> > +#define SPR_HDEC	0x136
> >   #define SPR_HSRR0	0x13A
> >   #define SPR_HSRR1	0x13B
> > +#define SPR_LPCR	0x13E
> > +#define   LPCR_HDICE	0x1UL
> > +#define SPR_HEIR	0x153
> > +#define SPR_SIAR	0x31C
> >   
> >   /* Machine State Register definitions: */
> >   #define MSR_LE_BIT	0
> >   #define MSR_EE_BIT	15			/* External Interrupts Enable */
> >   #define MSR_HV_BIT	60			/* Hypervisor mode */
> >   #define MSR_SF_BIT	63			/* 64-bit mode */
> > -#define MSR_ME		0x1000ULL
> >   
> > -#define SPR_HSRR0	0x13A
> > -#define SPR_HSRR1	0x13B
> > +#define MSR_DR		0x0010ULL
> > +#define MSR_IR		0x0020ULL
> > +#define MSR_BE		0x0200ULL		/* Branch Trace Enable */
> > +#define MSR_SE		0x0400ULL		/* Single Step Enable */
> > +#define MSR_EE		0x8000ULL
> > +#define MSR_ME		0x1000ULL
> >   
> >   #endif /* _ASMPOWERPC_PPC_ASM_H */
> > diff --git a/powerpc/Makefile.common b/powerpc/Makefile.common
> > index a7af225b..b340a53b 100644
> > --- a/powerpc/Makefile.common
> > +++ b/powerpc/Makefile.common
> > @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ tests-common = \
> >   	$(TEST_DIR)/rtas.elf \
> >   	$(TEST_DIR)/emulator.elf \
> >   	$(TEST_DIR)/tm.elf \
> > -	$(TEST_DIR)/sprs.elf
> > +	$(TEST_DIR)/sprs.elf \
> > +	$(TEST_DIR)/interrupts.elf
> >   
> >   tests-all = $(tests-common) $(tests)
> >   all: directories $(TEST_DIR)/boot_rom.bin $(tests-all)
> > diff --git a/powerpc/interrupts.c b/powerpc/interrupts.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000..3217b15e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/powerpc/interrupts.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,422 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Test interrupts
> > + *
> > + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU LGPL, version 2.
> > + */
> > +#include <libcflat.h>
> > +#include <util.h>
> > +#include <migrate.h>
> > +#include <alloc.h>
> > +#include <asm/handlers.h>
> > +#include <asm/hcall.h>
> > +#include <asm/processor.h>
> > +#include <asm/barrier.h>
> > +
> > +#define SPR_LPCR	0x13E
> > +#define LPCR_HDICE	0x1UL
> > +#define SPR_DEC		0x016
> > +#define SPR_HDEC	0x136
> > +
> > +#define MSR_DR		0x0010ULL
> > +#define MSR_IR		0x0020ULL
> > +#define MSR_EE		0x8000ULL
> > +#define MSR_ME		0x1000ULL
>
> Why don't you use the definitions from ppc_asm.h above?

Yeah, should be more consistent with those. I'll take a look.

>
> > +static bool cpu_has_heir(void)
> > +{
> > +	uint32_t pvr = mfspr(287);	/* Processor Version Register */
> > +
> > +	if (!machine_is_powernv())
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	/* POWER6 has HEIR, but QEMU powernv support does not go that far */
> > +	switch (pvr >> 16) {
> > +	case 0x4b:			/* POWER8E */
> > +	case 0x4c:			/* POWER8NVL */
> > +	case 0x4d:			/* POWER8 */
> > +	case 0x4e:			/* POWER9 */
> > +	case 0x80:			/* POWER10 */
>
> I'd suggest to introduce some #defines for those PVR values instead of using 
> magic numbers all over the place?

Yeah you're right.

>
> > +		return true;
> > +	default:
> > +		return false;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool cpu_has_prefix(void)
> > +{
> > +	uint32_t pvr = mfspr(287);	/* Processor Version Register */
> > +	switch (pvr >> 16) {
> > +	case 0x80:			/* POWER10 */
> > +		return true;
> > +	default:
> > +		return false;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool cpu_has_lev_in_srr1(void)
> > +{
> > +	uint32_t pvr = mfspr(287);	/* Processor Version Register */
> > +	switch (pvr >> 16) {
> > +	case 0x80:			/* POWER10 */
> > +		return true;
> > +	default:
> > +		return false;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool regs_is_prefix(volatile struct pt_regs *regs)
> > +{
> > +	return (regs->msr >> (63-34)) & 1;
>
> You introduced a bunch of new #define MSR_xx statements ... why not for this 
> one, too?

It's an interrupt-specific bit so SRR1_xx, but yes it should be a
define.

>
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void regs_advance_insn(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > +{
> > +	if (regs_is_prefix(regs))
> > +		regs->nip += 8;
> > +	else
> > +		regs->nip += 4;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static volatile bool got_interrupt;
> > +static volatile struct pt_regs recorded_regs;
> > +
> > +static void mce_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, void *opaque)
> > +{
> > +	got_interrupt = true;
> > +	memcpy((void *)&recorded_regs, regs, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
> > +	regs_advance_insn(regs);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void test_mce(void)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long addr = -4ULL;
> > +	uint8_t tmp;
> > +
> > +	handle_exception(0x200, mce_handler, NULL);
> > +
> > +	if (machine_is_powernv()) {
> > +		enable_mcheck();
> > +	} else {
> > +		report(mfmsr() & MSR_ME, "pseries machine has MSR[ME]=1");
> > +		if (!(mfmsr() & MSR_ME)) { /* try to fix it */
> > +			enable_mcheck();
> > +		}
> > +		if (mfmsr() & MSR_ME) {
> > +			disable_mcheck();
> > +			report(mfmsr() & MSR_ME, "pseries is unable to change MSR[ME]");
> > +			if (!(mfmsr() & MSR_ME)) { /* try to fix it */
> > +				enable_mcheck();
> > +			}
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	asm volatile("lbz %0,0(%1)" : "=r"(tmp) : "r"(addr));
> > +
> > +	report(got_interrupt, "MCE on access to invalid real address");
> > +	report(mfspr(SPR_DAR) == addr, "MCE sets DAR correctly");
> > +	got_interrupt = false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void dseg_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, void *data)
> > +{
> > +	got_interrupt = true;
> > +	memcpy((void *)&recorded_regs, regs, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
> > +	regs_advance_insn(regs);
> > +	regs->msr &= ~MSR_DR;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void test_dseg(void)
> > +{
> > +	uint64_t msr, tmp;
> > +
> > +	report_prefix_push("data segment");
> > +
> > +	/* Some HV start in radix mode and need 0x300 */
> > +	handle_exception(0x300, &dseg_handler, NULL);
> > +	handle_exception(0x380, &dseg_handler, NULL);
> > +
> > +	asm volatile(
> > +"		mfmsr	%0		\n \
> > +		ori	%0,%0,%2	\n \
> > +		mtmsrd	%0		\n \
> > +		lbz	%1,0(0)		"
> > +		: "=r"(msr), "=r"(tmp) : "i"(MSR_DR): "memory");
> > +
> > +	report(got_interrupt, "interrupt on NULL dereference");
> > +	got_interrupt = false;
> > +
> > +	handle_exception(0x300, NULL, NULL);
> > +	handle_exception(0x380, NULL, NULL);
> > +
> > +	report_prefix_pop();
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void dec_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, void *data)
> > +{
> > +	got_interrupt = true;
> > +	memcpy((void *)&recorded_regs, regs, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
> > +	regs->msr &= ~MSR_EE;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void test_dec(void)
> > +{
> > +	uint64_t msr;
> > +
> > +	report_prefix_push("decrementer");
> > +
> > +	handle_exception(0x900, &dec_handler, NULL);
> > +
> > +	asm volatile(
> > +"		mtdec	%1		\n \
> > +		mfmsr	%0		\n \
> > +		ori	%0,%0,%2	\n \
> > +		mtmsrd	%0,1		"
> > +		: "=r"(msr) : "r"(10000), "i"(MSR_EE): "memory");
> > +
> > +	while (!got_interrupt)
> > +		;
>
> Maybe add a timeout (in case the interrupt never fires)?

Yeah that would improve things.

> > +	report(got_interrupt, "interrupt on decrementer underflow");
> > +	got_interrupt = false;
> > +
> > +	handle_exception(0x900, NULL, NULL);
> > +
> > +	if (!machine_is_powernv())
> > +		goto done;
> > +
> > +	handle_exception(0x980, &dec_handler, NULL);
> > +
> > +	mtspr(SPR_LPCR, mfspr(SPR_LPCR) | LPCR_HDICE);
> > +	asm volatile(
> > +"		mtspr	0x136,%1	\n \
> > +		mtdec	%3		\n \
> > +		mfmsr	%0		\n \
> > +		ori	%0,%0,%2	\n \
> > +		mtmsrd	%0,1		"
> > +		: "=r"(msr) : "r"(10000), "i"(MSR_EE), "r"(0x7fffffff): "memory");
> > +
> > +	while (!got_interrupt)
> > +		;
>
> dito?

Will do.

Thanks,
Nick

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"Laurent Vivier" <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	"Shaoqin Huang" <shahuang@redhat.com>,
	"Andrew Jones" <andrew.jones@linux.dev>,
	"Nico Boehr" <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 24/29] powerpc: interrupt tests
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 19:58:45 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CXURVO6COZBK.2YISETA5D0C2@wheely> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <feab6612-31f6-41bd-8ee9-89a19aa0e76c@redhat.com>

On Tue Dec 19, 2023 at 11:57 PM AEST, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 16/12/2023 14.42, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > Add basic testing of various kinds of interrupts, machine check,
> > page fault, illegal, decrementer, trace, syscall, etc.
> > 
> > This has a known failure on QEMU TCG pseries machines where MSR[ME]
> > can be incorrectly set to 0.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >   lib/powerpc/asm/ppc_asm.h |  21 +-
> >   powerpc/Makefile.common   |   3 +-
> >   powerpc/interrupts.c      | 422 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   powerpc/unittests.cfg     |   3 +
> >   4 files changed, 445 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >   create mode 100644 powerpc/interrupts.c
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/powerpc/asm/ppc_asm.h b/lib/powerpc/asm/ppc_asm.h
> > index ef2d91dd..778e78ee 100644
> > --- a/lib/powerpc/asm/ppc_asm.h
> > +++ b/lib/powerpc/asm/ppc_asm.h
> > @@ -35,17 +35,32 @@
> >   
> >   #endif /* __BYTE_ORDER__ */
> >   
> > +#define SPR_DSISR	0x012
> > +#define SPR_DAR		0x013
> > +#define SPR_DEC		0x016
> > +#define SPR_SRR0	0x01A
> > +#define SPR_SRR1	0x01B
> > +#define SPR_FSCR	0x099
> > +#define   FSCR_PREFIX	0x2000
> > +#define SPR_HDEC	0x136
> >   #define SPR_HSRR0	0x13A
> >   #define SPR_HSRR1	0x13B
> > +#define SPR_LPCR	0x13E
> > +#define   LPCR_HDICE	0x1UL
> > +#define SPR_HEIR	0x153
> > +#define SPR_SIAR	0x31C
> >   
> >   /* Machine State Register definitions: */
> >   #define MSR_LE_BIT	0
> >   #define MSR_EE_BIT	15			/* External Interrupts Enable */
> >   #define MSR_HV_BIT	60			/* Hypervisor mode */
> >   #define MSR_SF_BIT	63			/* 64-bit mode */
> > -#define MSR_ME		0x1000ULL
> >   
> > -#define SPR_HSRR0	0x13A
> > -#define SPR_HSRR1	0x13B
> > +#define MSR_DR		0x0010ULL
> > +#define MSR_IR		0x0020ULL
> > +#define MSR_BE		0x0200ULL		/* Branch Trace Enable */
> > +#define MSR_SE		0x0400ULL		/* Single Step Enable */
> > +#define MSR_EE		0x8000ULL
> > +#define MSR_ME		0x1000ULL
> >   
> >   #endif /* _ASMPOWERPC_PPC_ASM_H */
> > diff --git a/powerpc/Makefile.common b/powerpc/Makefile.common
> > index a7af225b..b340a53b 100644
> > --- a/powerpc/Makefile.common
> > +++ b/powerpc/Makefile.common
> > @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ tests-common = \
> >   	$(TEST_DIR)/rtas.elf \
> >   	$(TEST_DIR)/emulator.elf \
> >   	$(TEST_DIR)/tm.elf \
> > -	$(TEST_DIR)/sprs.elf
> > +	$(TEST_DIR)/sprs.elf \
> > +	$(TEST_DIR)/interrupts.elf
> >   
> >   tests-all = $(tests-common) $(tests)
> >   all: directories $(TEST_DIR)/boot_rom.bin $(tests-all)
> > diff --git a/powerpc/interrupts.c b/powerpc/interrupts.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000..3217b15e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/powerpc/interrupts.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,422 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Test interrupts
> > + *
> > + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU LGPL, version 2.
> > + */
> > +#include <libcflat.h>
> > +#include <util.h>
> > +#include <migrate.h>
> > +#include <alloc.h>
> > +#include <asm/handlers.h>
> > +#include <asm/hcall.h>
> > +#include <asm/processor.h>
> > +#include <asm/barrier.h>
> > +
> > +#define SPR_LPCR	0x13E
> > +#define LPCR_HDICE	0x1UL
> > +#define SPR_DEC		0x016
> > +#define SPR_HDEC	0x136
> > +
> > +#define MSR_DR		0x0010ULL
> > +#define MSR_IR		0x0020ULL
> > +#define MSR_EE		0x8000ULL
> > +#define MSR_ME		0x1000ULL
>
> Why don't you use the definitions from ppc_asm.h above?

Yeah, should be more consistent with those. I'll take a look.

>
> > +static bool cpu_has_heir(void)
> > +{
> > +	uint32_t pvr = mfspr(287);	/* Processor Version Register */
> > +
> > +	if (!machine_is_powernv())
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	/* POWER6 has HEIR, but QEMU powernv support does not go that far */
> > +	switch (pvr >> 16) {
> > +	case 0x4b:			/* POWER8E */
> > +	case 0x4c:			/* POWER8NVL */
> > +	case 0x4d:			/* POWER8 */
> > +	case 0x4e:			/* POWER9 */
> > +	case 0x80:			/* POWER10 */
>
> I'd suggest to introduce some #defines for those PVR values instead of using 
> magic numbers all over the place?

Yeah you're right.

>
> > +		return true;
> > +	default:
> > +		return false;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool cpu_has_prefix(void)
> > +{
> > +	uint32_t pvr = mfspr(287);	/* Processor Version Register */
> > +	switch (pvr >> 16) {
> > +	case 0x80:			/* POWER10 */
> > +		return true;
> > +	default:
> > +		return false;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool cpu_has_lev_in_srr1(void)
> > +{
> > +	uint32_t pvr = mfspr(287);	/* Processor Version Register */
> > +	switch (pvr >> 16) {
> > +	case 0x80:			/* POWER10 */
> > +		return true;
> > +	default:
> > +		return false;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool regs_is_prefix(volatile struct pt_regs *regs)
> > +{
> > +	return (regs->msr >> (63-34)) & 1;
>
> You introduced a bunch of new #define MSR_xx statements ... why not for this 
> one, too?

It's an interrupt-specific bit so SRR1_xx, but yes it should be a
define.

>
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void regs_advance_insn(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > +{
> > +	if (regs_is_prefix(regs))
> > +		regs->nip += 8;
> > +	else
> > +		regs->nip += 4;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static volatile bool got_interrupt;
> > +static volatile struct pt_regs recorded_regs;
> > +
> > +static void mce_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, void *opaque)
> > +{
> > +	got_interrupt = true;
> > +	memcpy((void *)&recorded_regs, regs, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
> > +	regs_advance_insn(regs);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void test_mce(void)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long addr = -4ULL;
> > +	uint8_t tmp;
> > +
> > +	handle_exception(0x200, mce_handler, NULL);
> > +
> > +	if (machine_is_powernv()) {
> > +		enable_mcheck();
> > +	} else {
> > +		report(mfmsr() & MSR_ME, "pseries machine has MSR[ME]=1");
> > +		if (!(mfmsr() & MSR_ME)) { /* try to fix it */
> > +			enable_mcheck();
> > +		}
> > +		if (mfmsr() & MSR_ME) {
> > +			disable_mcheck();
> > +			report(mfmsr() & MSR_ME, "pseries is unable to change MSR[ME]");
> > +			if (!(mfmsr() & MSR_ME)) { /* try to fix it */
> > +				enable_mcheck();
> > +			}
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	asm volatile("lbz %0,0(%1)" : "=r"(tmp) : "r"(addr));
> > +
> > +	report(got_interrupt, "MCE on access to invalid real address");
> > +	report(mfspr(SPR_DAR) == addr, "MCE sets DAR correctly");
> > +	got_interrupt = false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void dseg_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, void *data)
> > +{
> > +	got_interrupt = true;
> > +	memcpy((void *)&recorded_regs, regs, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
> > +	regs_advance_insn(regs);
> > +	regs->msr &= ~MSR_DR;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void test_dseg(void)
> > +{
> > +	uint64_t msr, tmp;
> > +
> > +	report_prefix_push("data segment");
> > +
> > +	/* Some HV start in radix mode and need 0x300 */
> > +	handle_exception(0x300, &dseg_handler, NULL);
> > +	handle_exception(0x380, &dseg_handler, NULL);
> > +
> > +	asm volatile(
> > +"		mfmsr	%0		\n \
> > +		ori	%0,%0,%2	\n \
> > +		mtmsrd	%0		\n \
> > +		lbz	%1,0(0)		"
> > +		: "=r"(msr), "=r"(tmp) : "i"(MSR_DR): "memory");
> > +
> > +	report(got_interrupt, "interrupt on NULL dereference");
> > +	got_interrupt = false;
> > +
> > +	handle_exception(0x300, NULL, NULL);
> > +	handle_exception(0x380, NULL, NULL);
> > +
> > +	report_prefix_pop();
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void dec_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, void *data)
> > +{
> > +	got_interrupt = true;
> > +	memcpy((void *)&recorded_regs, regs, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
> > +	regs->msr &= ~MSR_EE;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void test_dec(void)
> > +{
> > +	uint64_t msr;
> > +
> > +	report_prefix_push("decrementer");
> > +
> > +	handle_exception(0x900, &dec_handler, NULL);
> > +
> > +	asm volatile(
> > +"		mtdec	%1		\n \
> > +		mfmsr	%0		\n \
> > +		ori	%0,%0,%2	\n \
> > +		mtmsrd	%0,1		"
> > +		: "=r"(msr) : "r"(10000), "i"(MSR_EE): "memory");
> > +
> > +	while (!got_interrupt)
> > +		;
>
> Maybe add a timeout (in case the interrupt never fires)?

Yeah that would improve things.

> > +	report(got_interrupt, "interrupt on decrementer underflow");
> > +	got_interrupt = false;
> > +
> > +	handle_exception(0x900, NULL, NULL);
> > +
> > +	if (!machine_is_powernv())
> > +		goto done;
> > +
> > +	handle_exception(0x980, &dec_handler, NULL);
> > +
> > +	mtspr(SPR_LPCR, mfspr(SPR_LPCR) | LPCR_HDICE);
> > +	asm volatile(
> > +"		mtspr	0x136,%1	\n \
> > +		mtdec	%3		\n \
> > +		mfmsr	%0		\n \
> > +		ori	%0,%0,%2	\n \
> > +		mtmsrd	%0,1		"
> > +		: "=r"(msr) : "r"(10000), "i"(MSR_EE), "r"(0x7fffffff): "memory");
> > +
> > +	while (!got_interrupt)
> > +		;
>
> dito?

Will do.

Thanks,
Nick

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-22  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 106+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-16 13:42 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 00/29] powerpc: updates, P10, PNV support Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 01/29] arch-run: Clean up temporary files properly Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 02/29] arch-run: Clean up initrd cleanup Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 03/29] migration: use a more robust way to wait for background job Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 04/29] migration: Support multiple migrations Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 05/29] arch-run: rename migration variables Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 06/29] powerpc: Quiet QEMU TCG pseries capability warnings Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19  5:55   ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-19  5:55     ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 07/29] powerpc: Add a migration stress tester Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19  5:58   ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-19  5:58     ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-22 10:32     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-22 10:32       ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 08/29] powerpc: Require KVM for the TM test Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19  5:59   ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-19  5:59     ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 09/29] powerpc: Fix interrupt stack alignment Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19  6:09   ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-19  6:09     ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 10/29] powerpc/sprs: Specify SPRs with data rather than code Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19  6:14   ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-19  6:14     ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-22 10:32     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-22 10:32       ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 11/29] powerpc/sprs: Don't fail changed SPRs that are used by the test harness Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 11:34   ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-19 11:34     ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 12/29] powerpc/sprs: Avoid taking async interrupts caused by register fuzzing Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 11:47   ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-19 11:47     ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-22  9:51     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-22  9:51       ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 13/29] powerpc: Make interrupt handler error more readable Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 11:53   ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-19 11:53     ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-22  9:52     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-22  9:52       ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 14/29] powerpc: Expand exception handler vector granularity Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 11:55   ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-19 11:55     ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 15/29] powerpc: Add support for more interrupts including HV interrupts Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 16/29] powerpc: Set .got section alignment to 256 bytes Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 12:01   ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-19 12:01     ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 17/29] powerpc: Discover runtime load address dynamically Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 18/29] powerpc: Fix stack backtrace termination Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 12:22   ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-19 12:22     ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-22  9:55     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-22  9:55       ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 19/29] scripts: allow machine option to be specified in unittests.cfg Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 12:27   ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-19 12:27     ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 20/29] scripts: Accommodate powerpc powernv machine differences Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 12:36   ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-19 12:36     ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 21/29] powerpc: Support powernv machine with QEMU TCG Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 22/29] powerpc: Fix emulator illegal instruction test for powernv Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 12:39   ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-19 12:39     ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 23/29] powerpc/sprs: Test hypervisor registers on powernv machine Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 24/29] powerpc: interrupt tests Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 13:57   ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-19 13:57     ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-22  9:58     ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2023-12-22  9:58       ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 25/29] powerpc: Add rtas stop-self support Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 14:15   ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-19 14:15     ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 26/29] powerpc: add SMP and IPI support Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 27/29] powerpc: Avoid using larx/stcx. in spinlocks when only one CPU is running Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 28/29] powerpc: Add atomics tests Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 29/29] powerpc: Add timebase tests Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-16 13:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-12-19 14:23   ` Thomas Huth
2023-12-19 14:23     ` Thomas Huth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CXURVO6COZBK.2YISETA5D0C2@wheely \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.