All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>
To: "Miguel Ojeda" <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Cc: "Albin Babu Varghese" <albinbabuvarghese20@gmail.com>,
	<rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [[PATCH]] rust/list: replace unwrap() with ? in doctest examples
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 22:28:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DA6DJEG780UH.3FURKORQ8OY6U@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72nNX++eUKAHYvxMvEeHy6cfDP98cteVAgM7RuQH5hDkVg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon May 26, 2025 at 12:33 PM CEST, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 10:18 AM Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> The changes themselves look good, if we want to use the `ok_or` + error
>> combination. I haven't thought about this, so there might be something
>> better here, but it already is an improvement over the previous one.
>
> Yeah, I thought if perhaps we could have a better method (extension
> trait) for these cases, at least for unit tests. On the other hand, if
> it is just for unit tests, we are back at using something that is not
> "real code", which is what triggered this patch (but at least it would
> not panic).

Having thought about this more, I think this is fine. I don't know which
extension function we would add to make this nicer.

---
Cheers,
Benno

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-26 20:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-25 22:59 [[PATCH]] rust/list: replace unwrap() with ? in doctest examples Albin Babu Varghese
2025-05-26  8:18 ` Benno Lossin
2025-05-26 10:33   ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-05-26 20:28     ` Benno Lossin [this message]
2025-05-27  1:12       ` Albin Babu Varghese
2025-05-27  0:53   ` Albin Babu Varghese
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-05-25 22:34 Albin Babu Varghese

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DA6DJEG780UH.3FURKORQ8OY6U@kernel.org \
    --to=lossin@kernel.org \
    --cc=albinbabuvarghese20@gmail.com \
    --cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.