Re: [PATCH v2 08/15] xen/dt: Move bootfdt functions to xen/bootfdt.h

[Alejandro Vallejo <agarciav@amd.com>]

On Fri Jun 6, 2025 at 9:59 PM CEST, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jun 2025, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
>> On Fri Jun 6, 2025 at 10:59 AM CEST, Michal Orzel wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 05/06/2025 21:48, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
>> >> Part of an unpicking process to extract bootfdt contents independent of bootinfo
>> >> to a separate file for x86 to take.
>> >> 
>> >> Move functions required for early FDT parsing from device_tree.h and arm's
>> >> setup.h onto bootfdt.h
>> >> 
>> >> Declaration motion only. Not a functional change.
>> >> 
>> >> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Vallejo <agarciav@amd.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> v2:
>> >>   * Remove the u32 identifiers in the device_tree_get_u32() implementation
>> > I don't understand the reasoning behind changing u32->uint32_t only for one
>> > function in this patch while leaving others unmodified. Also what about u64?
>> > Either don't change any or change all.
>> 
>> Sure. Let's call the original u32->uint32_t change a misplaced mutation and
>> move on. The point is the motion, not these cleanups on top.
>
> Yes I agree. I know from past experience that Jan doesn't mind changes
> during code movements, but for me it is important that changes and code
> movement are separate. That is because I have almost automatic ways to
> check that code movement is correct if there are no changes. It saves me
> a lot of time during review. Then I can look at the individual changes
> separately.

That's interesting. Could you please share the runes? That's one side of
review I still struggle with.

Cheers,
Alejandro