From: "Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>
To: "Onur" <work@onurozkan.dev>
Cc: "Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>,
<ojeda@kernel.org>, <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>, <gary@garyguo.net>,
<a.hindborg@kernel.org>, <aliceryhl@google.com>,
<tmgross@umich.edu>, <dakr@kernel.org>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<mingo@redhat.com>, <will@kernel.org>, <longman@redhat.com>,
<felipe_life@live.com>, <daniel@sedlak.dev>,
<bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>, <simona@ffwll.ch>,
<airlied@gmail.com>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<lyude@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] implement ww_mutex abstraction for the Rust tree
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 14:48:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DAURXDWGWEDV.2GZ129VC6IFKF@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250624153102.3961f377@nimda.home>
On Tue Jun 24, 2025 at 2:31 PM CEST, Onur wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 10:20:48 +0200
> "Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue Jun 24, 2025 at 7:34 AM CEST, Onur wrote:
>> > Should we handle this in the initial implementation or leave it for
>> > follow-up patches after the core abstraction of ww_mutex has landed?
>>
>> Since you're writing these abstractions specifically for usage in
>> drm, I think we should look at the intended use-cases there and then
>> decide on an API.
>>
>> So maybe Lyude or Dave can chime in :)
>>
>> If you (or someone else) have another user for this API that needs it
>> ASAP, then we can think about merging this and improve it later. But
>> if we don't have a user, then we shouldn't merge it anyways.
>
> I don't think this is urgent, but it might be better to land the basic
> structure first and improve it gradually I think? I would be happy to
> continue working for the improvements as I don't plan to leave it as
> just the initial version.
I don't think we should land the basic API when we don't have a user
in-tree or blessed by the maintainers.
> I worked on the v5 review notes, but if we are going to consider
> designing a different API, then it doesn't make much sense to send a v6
> patch before finishing the design, which requires additional people in
> the topic. That would also mean some of the ongoing review discussion
> would be wasted.
I would just wait for DRM to say something :)
---
Cheers,
Benno
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-24 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-21 18:44 [PATCH v5 0/3] rust: add `ww_mutex` support Onur Özkan
2025-06-21 18:44 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] rust: add C wrappers for `ww_mutex` inline functions Onur Özkan
2025-06-21 18:44 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] implement ww_mutex abstraction for the Rust tree Onur Özkan
2025-06-22 9:18 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-23 13:04 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-23 13:44 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-23 14:47 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-23 15:14 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-23 17:11 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-23 23:22 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-24 5:34 ` Onur
2025-06-24 8:20 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-24 12:31 ` Onur
2025-06-24 12:48 ` Benno Lossin [this message]
2025-07-07 13:39 ` Onur
2025-07-07 15:31 ` Benno Lossin
2025-07-07 18:06 ` Onur
2025-07-07 19:48 ` Benno Lossin
2025-07-08 14:21 ` Onur
2025-08-01 21:22 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-08-02 10:42 ` Benno Lossin
2025-08-02 13:41 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-08-02 14:15 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-08-02 20:58 ` Benno Lossin
2025-08-05 15:18 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-08-05 9:08 ` Onur Özkan
2025-08-05 12:41 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-08-05 13:50 ` Onur Özkan
2025-06-23 11:51 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-06-23 13:26 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-23 18:17 ` Onur
2025-06-23 21:54 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-21 18:44 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] add KUnit coverage on Rust `ww_mutex` implementation Onur Özkan
2025-06-22 9:16 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] rust: add `ww_mutex` support Benno Lossin
2025-07-24 13:53 ` Onur Özkan
2025-07-29 17:15 ` Benno Lossin
2025-07-30 10:24 ` Onur Özkan
2025-07-30 10:55 ` Benno Lossin
2025-08-05 16:22 ` Lyude Paul
2025-08-05 17:56 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-08-06 5:57 ` Onur Özkan
2025-08-06 17:37 ` Lyude Paul
2025-08-06 19:30 ` Benno Lossin
2025-08-14 11:13 ` Onur Özkan
2025-08-14 12:38 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-08-14 15:56 ` Onur
2025-08-14 18:22 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-08-18 12:56 ` Onur Özkan
2025-09-01 10:05 ` Onur Özkan
2025-09-01 12:28 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-09-02 16:53 ` Onur
2025-09-03 6:24 ` Onur
2025-09-03 13:04 ` Daniel Almeida
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DAURXDWGWEDV.2GZ129VC6IFKF@kernel.org \
--to=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@sedlak.dev \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=felipe_life@live.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.