[PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: qcom-soc: Document new Milos and Glymur SoCs

[PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: qcom-soc: Document new Milos and Glymur SoCs

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

Extend the schema enforcing correct SoC-block naming to cover Milos
(compatibles already accepted by some maintainers for next release) and
Glymur (posted on mailing lists [1]) SoCs.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20250716152017.4070029-1-pankaj.patil@oss.qualcomm.com/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

---

I asked for documenting the Milos name at v2 of Milos patchset... it did
not happen and patches are already being accepted.

Cc: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
index a77d68dcad4e..27261039d56f 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
@@ -23,7 +23,9 @@ description: |
 select:
   properties:
     compatible:
-      pattern: "^qcom,.*(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcm|qcs|q[dr]u|sa|sar|sc|sd[amx]|sm|x1[ep])[0-9]+.*$"
+      oneOf:
+        - pattern: "^qcom,.*(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcm|qcs|q[dr]u|sa|sar|sc|sd[amx]|sm|x1[ep])[0-9]+.*$"
+        - pattern: "^qcom,.*(glymur|milos).*$"
   required:
     - compatible
 
@@ -34,6 +36,7 @@ properties:
       - pattern: "^qcom,(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcm|qcs|q[dr]u|sa|sc|sd[amx]|sm|x1[ep])[0-9]+(pro)?-.*$"
       - pattern: "^qcom,sar[0-9]+[a-z]?-.*$"
       - pattern: "^qcom,(sa|sc)8[0-9]+[a-z][a-z]?-.*$"
+      - pattern: "^qcom,(glymur|milos)-.*$"
 
       # Legacy namings - variations of existing patterns/compatibles are OK,
       # but do not add completely new entries to these:
-- 
2.48.1

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: qcom-soc: Document new Milos and Glymur SoCs

[Luca Weiss]

On Wed Jul 16, 2025 at 6:24 PM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Extend the schema enforcing correct SoC-block naming to cover Milos
> (compatibles already accepted by some maintainers for next release) and
> Glymur (posted on mailing lists [1]) SoCs.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20250716152017.4070029-1-pankaj.patil@oss.qualcomm.com/ [1]
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>
> ---
>
> I asked for documenting the Milos name at v2 of Milos patchset... it did
> not happen and patches are already being accepted.

Sorry about that, I seem to have missed that.

However I did not see any dt validation errors with my milos dts or
dt_binding_check on the bindings, where are these patterns relevant, in
case I should touch it again in the future?

Regards
Luca

>
> Cc: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
> index a77d68dcad4e..27261039d56f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
> @@ -23,7 +23,9 @@ description: |
>  select:
>    properties:
>      compatible:
> -      pattern: "^qcom,.*(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcm|qcs|q[dr]u|sa|sar|sc|sd[amx]|sm|x1[ep])[0-9]+.*$"
> +      oneOf:
> +        - pattern: "^qcom,.*(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcm|qcs|q[dr]u|sa|sar|sc|sd[amx]|sm|x1[ep])[0-9]+.*$"
> +        - pattern: "^qcom,.*(glymur|milos).*$"
>    required:
>      - compatible
>  
> @@ -34,6 +36,7 @@ properties:
>        - pattern: "^qcom,(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcm|qcs|q[dr]u|sa|sc|sd[amx]|sm|x1[ep])[0-9]+(pro)?-.*$"
>        - pattern: "^qcom,sar[0-9]+[a-z]?-.*$"
>        - pattern: "^qcom,(sa|sc)8[0-9]+[a-z][a-z]?-.*$"
> +      - pattern: "^qcom,(glymur|milos)-.*$"
>  
>        # Legacy namings - variations of existing patterns/compatibles are OK,
>        # but do not add completely new entries to these:

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: qcom-soc: Document new Milos and Glymur SoCs

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 17/07/2025 08:27, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On Wed Jul 16, 2025 at 6:24 PM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Extend the schema enforcing correct SoC-block naming to cover Milos
>> (compatibles already accepted by some maintainers for next release) and
>> Glymur (posted on mailing lists [1]) SoCs.
>>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20250716152017.4070029-1-pankaj.patil@oss.qualcomm.com/ [1]
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> I asked for documenting the Milos name at v2 of Milos patchset... it did
>> not happen and patches are already being accepted.
> 
> Sorry about that, I seem to have missed that.
> 
> However I did not see any dt validation errors with my milos dts or
> dt_binding_check on the bindings, where are these patterns relevant, in
> case I should touch it again in the future?

There would not be any errors, because how these bindings are written -
to ignore other, unknown names.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: qcom-soc: Document new Milos and Glymur SoCs

[Luca Weiss]

On Thu Jul 17, 2025 at 8:33 AM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/07/2025 08:27, Luca Weiss wrote:
>> On Wed Jul 16, 2025 at 6:24 PM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Extend the schema enforcing correct SoC-block naming to cover Milos
>>> (compatibles already accepted by some maintainers for next release) and
>>> Glymur (posted on mailing lists [1]) SoCs.
>>>
>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20250716152017.4070029-1-pankaj.patil@oss.qualcomm.com/ [1]
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> I asked for documenting the Milos name at v2 of Milos patchset... it did
>>> not happen and patches are already being accepted.
>> 
>> Sorry about that, I seem to have missed that.
>> 
>> However I did not see any dt validation errors with my milos dts or
>> dt_binding_check on the bindings, where are these patterns relevant, in
>> case I should touch it again in the future?
>
> There would not be any errors, because how these bindings are written -
> to ignore other, unknown names.

Ok clear, thanks for sending this patch!

Regards
Luca

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: qcom-soc: Document new Milos and Glymur SoCs

[Rob Herring (Arm)]

On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 18:24:13 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Extend the schema enforcing correct SoC-block naming to cover Milos
> (compatibles already accepted by some maintainers for next release) and
> Glymur (posted on mailing lists [1]) SoCs.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20250716152017.4070029-1-pankaj.patil@oss.qualcomm.com/ [1]
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> 
> ---
> 
> I asked for documenting the Milos name at v2 of Milos patchset... it did
> not happen and patches are already being accepted.
> 
> Cc: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: qcom-soc: Document new Milos and Glymur SoCs

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 18:24:13 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Extend the schema enforcing correct SoC-block naming to cover Milos
> (compatibles already accepted by some maintainers for next release) and
> Glymur (posted on mailing lists [1]) SoCs.
> 
> 

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] dt-bindings: arm: qcom-soc: Document new Milos and Glymur SoCs
      commit: 474aa14da0e160f2f3fb002b64b8363ae91f9590

Best regards,
-- 
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>