All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Wolfram Sang" <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	"Jean-François Lessard" <jefflessard3@gmail.com>,
	"Daniel Scally" <djrscally@gmail.com>,
	"Heikki Krogerus" <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	"Sakari Ailus" <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] device property: Add scoped fwnode child node iterators
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2025 12:13:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DCJXQ4CUQ88U.ZEEGKWZRCGL6@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aLljGIcjAjQhC2uS@smile.fi.intel.com>

On Thu Sep 4, 2025 at 11:59 AM CEST, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 11:49:25AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> 
>> > It might be good to have an immutable branch for me from i2c core.
>> > Wolfram, can you provide a such if no objections?
>> 
>> Sure thing, I can do that. But there is still discussion on patch 1, so
>> I will wait for an outcome there.
>
> But it seems that the discussion can be implemented in a followup?

If Sakari attempts the rework, and we can prove this doesn't regress existing
users, removing fwnode_for_each_available_child_node_scoped() in the context
of the rework again should be trivial.

Given that, I don't see a reason to stall people working with the existing
semantics of the API in the meantime.

So, AFAIC, my ACK is still valid.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-04 10:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-02 19:04 [PATCH v4 0/2] device property: Add scoped fwnode child node iterators Jean-François Lessard
2025-09-02 19:04 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] " Jean-François Lessard
2025-09-02 19:11   ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-09-03 10:29   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-03 13:18   ` Sakari Ailus
2025-09-03 16:43     ` Jean-François Lessard
2025-09-03 17:22     ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-09-04  5:56       ` Sakari Ailus
2025-09-04  7:03         ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-09-04  7:43           ` Sakari Ailus
2025-09-04  8:51             ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-09-04 11:54               ` Sakari Ailus
2025-09-04 12:39                 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-09-04 16:14                 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-09-16 16:18                   ` Sakari Ailus
2025-09-25 20:43   ` Wolfram Sang
2025-09-02 19:04 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] i2c: core: Use fwnode_for_each_child_node_scoped() Jean-François Lessard
2025-09-03 13:19   ` Sakari Ailus
2025-09-25 20:43   ` Wolfram Sang
2025-09-03 10:30 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] device property: Add scoped fwnode child node iterators Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-04  9:49   ` Wolfram Sang
2025-09-04  9:59     ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-04 10:13       ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2025-09-04 10:38         ` Sakari Ailus
2025-09-10 12:53       ` Wolfram Sang
2025-09-12 22:28         ` Wolfram Sang
2025-09-15  6:27           ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-25 10:54             ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DCJXQ4CUQ88U.ZEEGKWZRCGL6@kernel.org \
    --to=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jefflessard3@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.