* [PATCH] arm: mach-k3: j722s: Update SoC auto-gen data
@ 2025-11-25 9:46 Chintan Vankar
2025-11-25 14:07 ` Michael Walle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chintan Vankar @ 2025-11-25 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chintan Vankar, Tom Rini; +Cc: u-kumar1, vigneshr, mwalle, u-boot
Update dev-data and clk-data to fix the eMMC boot for J722s-EVM.
Fixes: a02009f3a816 ("arm: mach-k3: j722s: Update SoC autogenerated data to enable Ethernet boot")
Reported-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chintan Vankar <c-vankar@ti.com>
---
This patch is based on commit "4a4871e3dc38" of origin/next branch of
u-boot.
arch/arm/mach-k3/r5/j722s/clk-data.c | 12 +++++++
arch/arm/mach-k3/r5/j722s/dev-data.c | 50 +++++++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-k3/r5/j722s/clk-data.c b/arch/arm/mach-k3/r5/j722s/clk-data.c
index 238d57d0aa0..cb3d864c5a3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-k3/r5/j722s/clk-data.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-k3/r5/j722s/clk-data.c
@@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ static const char * const main_cp_gemac_cpts_clk_sel_out0_parents[] = {
"sam62_pll_ctrl_wrap_main_0_chip_div1_clk_clk",
};
+static const char * const main_emmcsd0_refclk_sel_out0_parents[] = {
+ "postdiv4_16ff_main_0_hsdivout5_clk",
+ "hsdiv4_16fft_main_2_hsdivout2_clk",
+};
+
static const char * const main_emmcsd1_refclk_sel_out0_parents[] = {
"postdiv4_16ff_main_0_hsdivout5_clk",
"hsdiv4_16fft_main_2_hsdivout2_clk",
@@ -106,6 +111,8 @@ static const char * const main_timerclkn_sel_out0_parents[] = {
NULL,
NULL,
NULL,
+ NULL,
+ NULL,
};
static const char * const wkup_clkout_sel_out0_parents[] = {
@@ -205,6 +212,7 @@ static const struct clk_data clk_list[] = {
CLK_MUX_PLLCTRL("sam62_pll_ctrl_wrap_mcu_0_sysclkout_clk", sam62_pll_ctrl_wrap_mcu_0_sysclkout_clk_parents, 2, 0x4020000, 0),
CLK_DIV("sam62_pll_ctrl_wrap_mcu_0_chip_div1_clk_clk", "sam62_pll_ctrl_wrap_mcu_0_sysclkout_clk", 0x4020118, 0, 5, 0, 0),
CLK_MUX("clkout0_ctrl_out0", clkout0_ctrl_out0_parents, 2, 0x108010, 0, 1, 0),
+ CLK_MUX("main_emmcsd0_refclk_sel_out0", main_emmcsd0_refclk_sel_out0_parents, 2, 0x108160, 0, 1, 0),
CLK_MUX("main_cp_gemac_cpts_clk_sel_out0", main_cp_gemac_cpts_clk_sel_out0_parents, 8, 0x108140, 0, 3, 0),
CLK_MUX("main_emmcsd1_refclk_sel_out0", main_emmcsd1_refclk_sel_out0_parents, 2, 0x108168, 0, 1, 0),
CLK_MUX("main_gtcclk_sel_out0", main_gtcclk_sel_out0_parents, 8, 0x43008030, 0, 3, 0),
@@ -262,6 +270,10 @@ static const struct dev_clk soc_dev_clk_data[] = {
DEV_CLK(36, 10, "board_0_cp_gemac_cpts0_rft_clk_out"),
DEV_CLK(36, 11, "hsdiv4_16fft_main_1_hsdivout3_clk"),
DEV_CLK(36, 12, "postdiv4_16ff_main_2_hsdivout6_clk"),
+ DEV_CLK(57, 1, "sam62_pll_ctrl_wrap_main_0_chip_div1_clk_clk"),
+ DEV_CLK(57, 2, "main_emmcsd0_refclk_sel_out0"),
+ DEV_CLK(57, 3, "postdiv4_16ff_main_0_hsdivout5_clk"),
+ DEV_CLK(57, 4, "hsdiv4_16fft_main_2_hsdivout2_clk"),
DEV_CLK(36, 13, "cpsw_3guss_am67_main_0_cpts_genf0"),
DEV_CLK(36, 14, "cpsw_3guss_am67_main_0_cpts_genf1"),
DEV_CLK(58, 0, "main_emmcsd1_io_clklb_sel_out0"),
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-k3/r5/j722s/dev-data.c b/arch/arm/mach-k3/r5/j722s/dev-data.c
index d6832266884..5f7e2a44fed 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-k3/r5/j722s/dev-data.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-k3/r5/j722s/dev-data.c
@@ -23,18 +23,19 @@ static struct ti_pd soc_pd_list[] = {
static struct ti_lpsc soc_lpsc_list[] = {
[0] = PSC_LPSC(0, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[0], NULL),
- [1] = PSC_LPSC(12, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[0], &soc_lpsc_list[4]),
- [2] = PSC_LPSC(13, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[0], &soc_lpsc_list[4]),
- [3] = PSC_LPSC(21, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[0], &soc_lpsc_list[6]),
- [4] = PSC_LPSC(23, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[0], &soc_lpsc_list[6]),
- [5] = PSC_LPSC(28, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[0], &soc_lpsc_list[6]),
- [6] = PSC_LPSC(34, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[0], &soc_lpsc_list[6]),
- [7] = PSC_LPSC(42, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[0], &soc_lpsc_list[6]),
- [8] = PSC_LPSC(53, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[1], &soc_lpsc_list[6]),
- [9] = PSC_LPSC(56, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[2], &soc_lpsc_list[8]),
- [10] = PSC_LPSC(72, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[3], &soc_lpsc_list[6]),
- [11] = PSC_LPSC(73, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[3], &soc_lpsc_list[10]),
- [12] = PSC_LPSC(74, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[3], &soc_lpsc_list[11]),
+ [1] = PSC_LPSC(12, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[0], &soc_lpsc_list[5]),
+ [2] = PSC_LPSC(13, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[0], &soc_lpsc_list[5]),
+ [3] = PSC_LPSC(20, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[0], &soc_lpsc_list[7]),
+ [4] = PSC_LPSC(21, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[0], &soc_lpsc_list[7]),
+ [5] = PSC_LPSC(23, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[0], &soc_lpsc_list[7]),
+ [6] = PSC_LPSC(28, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[0], &soc_lpsc_list[7]),
+ [7] = PSC_LPSC(34, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[0], &soc_lpsc_list[7]),
+ [8] = PSC_LPSC(42, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[0], &soc_lpsc_list[7]),
+ [9] = PSC_LPSC(53, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[1], &soc_lpsc_list[7]),
+ [10] = PSC_LPSC(56, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[2], &soc_lpsc_list[9]),
+ [11] = PSC_LPSC(72, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[3], &soc_lpsc_list[7]),
+ [12] = PSC_LPSC(73, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[3], &soc_lpsc_list[11]),
+ [13] = PSC_LPSC(74, &soc_psc_list[0], &soc_pd_list[3], &soc_lpsc_list[12]),
};
static struct ti_dev soc_dev_list[] = {
@@ -43,18 +44,19 @@ static struct ti_dev soc_dev_list[] = {
PSC_DEV(61, &soc_lpsc_list[0]),
PSC_DEV(178, &soc_lpsc_list[1]),
PSC_DEV(179, &soc_lpsc_list[2]),
- PSC_DEV(58, &soc_lpsc_list[3]),
- PSC_DEV(161, &soc_lpsc_list[4]),
- PSC_DEV(75, &soc_lpsc_list[5]),
- PSC_DEV(36, &soc_lpsc_list[6]),
- PSC_DEV(102, &soc_lpsc_list[6]),
- PSC_DEV(146, &soc_lpsc_list[6]),
- PSC_DEV(13, &soc_lpsc_list[7]),
- PSC_DEV(166, &soc_lpsc_list[8]),
- PSC_DEV(135, &soc_lpsc_list[9]),
- PSC_DEV(170, &soc_lpsc_list[10]),
- PSC_DEV(177, &soc_lpsc_list[11]),
- PSC_DEV(55, &soc_lpsc_list[12]),
+ PSC_DEV(57, &soc_lpsc_list[3]),
+ PSC_DEV(58, &soc_lpsc_list[4]),
+ PSC_DEV(161, &soc_lpsc_list[5]),
+ PSC_DEV(75, &soc_lpsc_list[6]),
+ PSC_DEV(36, &soc_lpsc_list[7]),
+ PSC_DEV(102, &soc_lpsc_list[7]),
+ PSC_DEV(146, &soc_lpsc_list[7]),
+ PSC_DEV(13, &soc_lpsc_list[8]),
+ PSC_DEV(166, &soc_lpsc_list[9]),
+ PSC_DEV(135, &soc_lpsc_list[10]),
+ PSC_DEV(170, &soc_lpsc_list[11]),
+ PSC_DEV(177, &soc_lpsc_list[12]),
+ PSC_DEV(55, &soc_lpsc_list[13]),
};
const struct ti_k3_pd_platdata j722s_pd_platdata = {
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: mach-k3: j722s: Update SoC auto-gen data
2025-11-25 9:46 [PATCH] arm: mach-k3: j722s: Update SoC auto-gen data Chintan Vankar
@ 2025-11-25 14:07 ` Michael Walle
2025-11-26 19:23 ` Chintan Vankar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Walle @ 2025-11-25 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chintan Vankar, Tom Rini; +Cc: u-kumar1, vigneshr, u-boot
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 681 bytes --]
On Tue Nov 25, 2025 at 10:46 AM CET, Chintan Vankar wrote:
> Update dev-data and clk-data to fix the eMMC boot for J722s-EVM.
Isn't there any more information? Why was it dropped in the previous
commit?
> Fixes: a02009f3a816 ("arm: mach-k3: j722s: Update SoC autogenerated data to enable Ethernet boot")
> Reported-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chintan Vankar <c-vankar@ti.com>
> ---
>
> This patch is based on commit "4a4871e3dc38" of origin/next branch of
> u-boot.
This shall go into origin/master, no? The issue is present in the
v2026.01-rcN.
That being said,
Tested-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
Thanks,
-michael
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 297 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: mach-k3: j722s: Update SoC auto-gen data
2025-11-25 14:07 ` Michael Walle
@ 2025-11-26 19:23 ` Chintan Vankar
2025-11-28 11:35 ` Chintan Vankar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chintan Vankar @ 2025-11-26 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Walle, Tom Rini; +Cc: u-kumar1, vigneshr, u-boot
Hello Michael,
On 25/11/25 19:37, Michael Walle wrote:
> On Tue Nov 25, 2025 at 10:46 AM CET, Chintan Vankar wrote:
>> Update dev-data and clk-data to fix the eMMC boot for J722s-EVM.
>
> Isn't there any more information? Why was it dropped in the previous
> commit?
>
It was not dropped on purpose, I was enabling CPSW device and
unknowingly I removed device id 57.
>
>> Fixes: a02009f3a816 ("arm: mach-k3: j722s: Update SoC autogenerated data to enable Ethernet boot")
>> Reported-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Chintan Vankar <c-vankar@ti.com>
>> ---
>>
>> This patch is based on commit "4a4871e3dc38" of origin/next branch of
>> u-boot.
>
> This shall go into origin/master, no? The issue is present in the
> v2026.01-rcN.
>
Ack, I will rebased onto origin/master and resend.
> That being said,
> Tested-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
>
Thank you.
Regards,
Chintan.
> Thanks,
> -michael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: mach-k3: j722s: Update SoC auto-gen data
2025-11-26 19:23 ` Chintan Vankar
@ 2025-11-28 11:35 ` Chintan Vankar
2025-11-28 15:42 ` Michael Walle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chintan Vankar @ 2025-11-28 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Walle, Tom Rini; +Cc: u-kumar1, vigneshr, u-boot
Hello Michael,
On 27/11/25 00:53, Chintan Vankar wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> On 25/11/25 19:37, Michael Walle wrote:
>> On Tue Nov 25, 2025 at 10:46 AM CET, Chintan Vankar wrote:
>>> Update dev-data and clk-data to fix the eMMC boot for J722s-EVM.
>>
>> Isn't there any more information? Why was it dropped in the previous
>> commit?
>>
>
> It was not dropped on purpose, I was enabling CPSW device and
> unknowingly I removed device id 57.
>
>>
>>> Fixes: a02009f3a816 ("arm: mach-k3: j722s: Update SoC autogenerated
>>> data to enable Ethernet boot")
>>> Reported-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chintan Vankar <c-vankar@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> This patch is based on commit "4a4871e3dc38" of origin/next branch of
>>> u-boot.
>>
>> This shall go into origin/master, no? The issue is present in the
>> v2026.01-rcN.
>>
>
I saw that the patch is already on top of the origin/master branch with
tag "v2026.01-rc3". Can you please add "Acked-By" to unblock it for a
maintainer to get it merged?
Regards,
Chintan.
> Ack, I will rebased onto origin/master and resend.
>
>> That being said,
>> Tested-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
>>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Regards,
> Chintan.
>
>> Thanks,
>> -michael
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: mach-k3: j722s: Update SoC auto-gen data
2025-11-28 11:35 ` Chintan Vankar
@ 2025-11-28 15:42 ` Michael Walle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Walle @ 2025-11-28 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chintan Vankar, Tom Rini; +Cc: u-kumar1, vigneshr, u-boot
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 504 bytes --]
Hi,
>>>> This patch is based on commit "4a4871e3dc38" of origin/next branch of
>>>> u-boot.
>>>
>>> This shall go into origin/master, no? The issue is present in the
>>> v2026.01-rcN.
>>>
>>
>
> I saw that the patch is already on top of the origin/master branch with
> tag "v2026.01-rc3". Can you please add "Acked-By" to unblock it for a
> maintainer to get it merged?
Not sure what you mean. I don't it's up to me to ack this patch.
FWIW, you already have my tested-tag.
-michael
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 297 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-11-28 15:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-11-25 9:46 [PATCH] arm: mach-k3: j722s: Update SoC auto-gen data Chintan Vankar
2025-11-25 14:07 ` Michael Walle
2025-11-26 19:23 ` Chintan Vankar
2025-11-28 11:35 ` Chintan Vankar
2025-11-28 15:42 ` Michael Walle
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.