All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Faith Ekstrand <faith.ekstrand@collabora.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau: Add DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GET_ZCULL_INFO
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2026 11:58:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DG6Z3TV6WX2I.17RY4HGCSP6TD@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPM=9txDN8NtX2UFfo8KtkaqW_rgM7oE-nLC+XyaOEAS6sj-qg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu Feb 5, 2026 at 1:43 AM CET, Dave Airlie wrote:
> I don't think we need to go through NVIF, or at least we could do it,
> but there is no gr object exposed through it now and adding a whole
> load of gr code to nvif would be a nightmare,

I mean, we can bypass it, but it would be yet another inconsistency. Though, I
do fully agree that there is not much value in adding the required code. And
similar to the other thread, things have changed a bit and we may be able to
afford being a bit more relaxed about those things.

> I'd rather we merged the kill nvif patches.

Maybe we should just do that?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: "M Henning" <mhenning@darkrefraction.com>,
	"Karol Herbst" <kherbst@redhat.com>,
	"Lyude Paul" <lyude@redhat.com>,
	"Faith Ekstrand" <faith.ekstrand@collabora.com>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau: Add DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GET_ZCULL_INFO
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2026 11:58:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DG6Z3TV6WX2I.17RY4HGCSP6TD@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPM=9txDN8NtX2UFfo8KtkaqW_rgM7oE-nLC+XyaOEAS6sj-qg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu Feb 5, 2026 at 1:43 AM CET, Dave Airlie wrote:
> I don't think we need to go through NVIF, or at least we could do it,
> but there is no gr object exposed through it now and adding a whole
> load of gr code to nvif would be a nightmare,

I mean, we can bypass it, but it would be yet another inconsistency. Though, I
do fully agree that there is not much value in adding the required code. And
similar to the other thread, things have changed a bit and we may be able to
afford being a bit more relaxed about those things.

> I'd rather we merged the kill nvif patches.

Maybe we should just do that?

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-05 10:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-12 21:36 [PATCH 0/2] drm/nouveau: ZCULL support Mel Henning
2025-03-12 21:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau: Add DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GET_ZCULL_INFO Mel Henning
2025-03-20 18:18   ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-03-20 18:37     ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-03-20 19:57     ` Ben Skeggs
2025-03-20 20:01       ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-03-25 23:40         ` M Henning
2025-03-27 12:56           ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-03-27 18:26             ` M Henning
2025-03-28 11:04               ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-02-05  0:43                 ` Dave Airlie
2026-02-05  0:43                   ` Dave Airlie
2026-02-05 10:58                   ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2026-02-05 10:58                     ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-03-21 22:06     ` M Henning
2025-03-27 13:51       ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-03-27 18:03         ` M Henning
2025-03-28 11:09           ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-02-05  1:16             ` Dave Airlie
2026-02-05  1:16               ` Dave Airlie
2026-02-05  2:13               ` John Hubbard
2026-02-05  2:13                 ` John Hubbard
2026-02-05 10:46               ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-02-05 10:46                 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-03-12 21:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/nouveau: DRM_NOUVEAU_SET_ZCULL_CTXSW_BUFFER Mel Henning
2025-03-20 18:34   ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-03-21 23:00     ` M Henning
2025-03-27 13:58       ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-03-27 19:01         ` M Henning
2025-03-28 11:48           ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-08-01  2:15             ` M Henning

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DG6Z3TV6WX2I.17RY4HGCSP6TD@kernel.org \
    --to=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=faith.ekstrand@collabora.com \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.