Re: [PATCH] x86/kconfig: Reflow the SHADOW help message

[Alejandro Vallejo <alejandro.garciavallejo@amd.com>]

On Mon Feb 9, 2026 at 3:26 PM CET, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.02.2026 11:33, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
>> Wasn't following the tab+2 spaces convention throughout the rest of the file.
>> 
>> Not a functional change.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Vallejo <alejandro.garciavallejo@amd.com>
>
> Largely:
> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

Thanks.

>
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> @@ -148,20 +148,17 @@ config SHADOW_PAGING
>>  	default !PV_SHIM_EXCLUSIVE
>>  	depends on PV || HVM
>>  	help
>> +	  Shadow paging is a software alternative to hardware paging support
>> +	  (Intel EPT, AMD NPT).
>>  
>> -          Shadow paging is a software alternative to hardware paging support
>> -          (Intel EPT, AMD NPT).
>> +	  It is required for:
>> +	  * Running HVM guests on hardware lacking hardware paging support
>> +	    (First-generation Intel VT-x or AMD SVM).
>> +	  * Live migration of PV guests.
>> +	  * L1TF sidechannel mitigation for PV guests.
>>  
>> -          It is required for:
>> -            * Running HVM guests on hardware lacking hardware paging support
>> -              (First-generation Intel VT-x or AMD SVM).
>> -            * Live migration of PV guests.
>> -            * L1TF sidechannel mitigation for PV guests.
>> -
>> -          Under a small number of specific workloads, shadow paging may be
>> -          deliberately used as a performance optimisation.
>> -
>> -          If unsure, say Y.
>
> I'm trying to establish (among the committers) whether we're indeed meaning
> to drop this sentence from Kconfig help texts that we touch. If I wouldn't
> get conclusive feedback, I'd likely put it back in.
>
> Jan

Sounds good to me either way.

Cheers,
Alejandro