Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] gpu: nova-drm: rename nova to nova-drm

["Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>]

On Wed Mar 18, 2026 at 12:34 AM JST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Tue Mar 17, 2026 at 4:22 PM CET, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> On Tue Mar 17, 2026 at 10:53 PM JST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>>> On Tue Mar 17, 2026 at 2:20 PM CET, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>>> On Tue Mar 17, 2026 at 6:23 PM JST, Cheng-Yang Chou wrote:
>>>>> Rename the nova-drm driver directory from drivers/gpu/drm/nova/ to
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/nova-drm/ and the top-level source file from nova.rs
>>>>> to nova_drm.rs (matching the object name nova_drm.o) to follow the
>>>>> kebab-case naming convention already used by the auxiliary device name.
>>>>>
>>>>> Update MAINTAINERS, Kconfig, and Makefile references accordingly.
>>>>> Update the Kconfig help text to reflect the new module name nova-drm.
>>>>>
>>>>> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1228
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>>> - Rename subject line (John Hubbard)
>>>>>
>>>>>  MAINTAINERS                                            | 6 +++---
>>>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig                                | 2 +-
>>>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile                               | 2 +-
>>>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/{nova => nova-drm}/Kconfig             | 2 +-
>>>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/nova-drm/Makefile                      | 3 +++
>>>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/{nova => nova-drm}/driver.rs           | 0
>>>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/{nova => nova-drm}/file.rs             | 0
>>>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/{nova => nova-drm}/gem.rs              | 0
>>>>
>>>> That `drm/nova-drm` reads a bit awkwardly to me and feels unnecessary.
>>>> Even `tegra-drm` is in `drm/tegra`.
>>>
>>> Well, that's why I named it "nova" in the first place, but I don't want
>>> KBUILD_MODNAME to diverge from the directory name and I also don't want the
>>> driver name to diverge from KBUILD_MODNAME.
>>
>> What is the rationale for that? I like consistency too, but also think
>> it is not particularly difficult to figure out that "nova-drm" resides
>> in "drm/nova".
>
> It is consistency. But why are we discussing this, what is the concern being
> consistent here?

I just find the repetition of "drm" unnecessary. That's not a big deal
though and I can definitely live with it.