From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: <sunliming@linux.dev>
Cc: <lyude@redhat.com>, <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
<mripard@kernel.org>, <tzimmermann@suse.de>, <airlied@gmail.com>,
<simona@ffwll.ch>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"sunliming" <sunliming@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/gsp: Fix possible NULL pointer dereference warning in r535_dmac_alloc
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2026 14:12:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DHW9RZVWDN6Y.2G2RKSJMF5ESB@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260418071412.86022-1-sunliming@linux.dev>
On Sat Apr 18, 2026 at 9:14 AM CEST, sunliming wrote:
> From: sunliming <sunliming@kylinos.cn>
>
> Fix below smatch warnings:
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/disp.c:178 r535_dmac_alloc()
> warn: 'args' can also be NULL
Please write a commit description that explains also the underlying problem; see
more below.
> Signed-off-by: sunliming <sunliming@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/disp.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/disp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/disp.c
> index 6e63df816d85..6dec2623d0be 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/disp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/disp.c
> @@ -172,6 +172,8 @@ r535_dmac_alloc(struct nvkm_disp *disp, u32 oclass, int inst, u32 put_offset,
>
> args = nvkm_gsp_rm_alloc_get(&disp->rm.object, (oclass << 16) | inst, oclass,
> sizeof(*args), dmac);
> + if (!args)
> + return -ENOMEM;
Are we sure that this can ever return NULL in the first place? I know that
nvkm_gsp_rm_alloc_get() internally checks for IS_ERR_OR_NULL(), but I couldn't
find anything within the callchain that would actually return NULL.
That said, I think IS_ERR_OR_NULL() checks are misleading.
> if (IS_ERR(args))
> return PTR_ERR(args);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: <sunliming@linux.dev>
Cc: maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
simona@ffwll.ch, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sunliming <sunliming@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/gsp: Fix possible NULL pointer dereference warning in r535_dmac_alloc
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2026 14:12:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DHW9RZVWDN6Y.2G2RKSJMF5ESB@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260418071412.86022-1-sunliming@linux.dev>
On Sat Apr 18, 2026 at 9:14 AM CEST, sunliming wrote:
> From: sunliming <sunliming@kylinos.cn>
>
> Fix below smatch warnings:
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/disp.c:178 r535_dmac_alloc()
> warn: 'args' can also be NULL
Please write a commit description that explains also the underlying problem; see
more below.
> Signed-off-by: sunliming <sunliming@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/disp.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/disp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/disp.c
> index 6e63df816d85..6dec2623d0be 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/disp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/disp.c
> @@ -172,6 +172,8 @@ r535_dmac_alloc(struct nvkm_disp *disp, u32 oclass, int inst, u32 put_offset,
>
> args = nvkm_gsp_rm_alloc_get(&disp->rm.object, (oclass << 16) | inst, oclass,
> sizeof(*args), dmac);
> + if (!args)
> + return -ENOMEM;
Are we sure that this can ever return NULL in the first place? I know that
nvkm_gsp_rm_alloc_get() internally checks for IS_ERR_OR_NULL(), but I couldn't
find anything within the callchain that would actually return NULL.
That said, I think IS_ERR_OR_NULL() checks are misleading.
> if (IS_ERR(args))
> return PTR_ERR(args);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-18 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-18 7:14 [PATCH] drm/nouveau/gsp: Fix possible NULL pointer dereference warning in r535_dmac_alloc sunliming
2026-04-18 7:14 ` sunliming
2026-04-18 12:12 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2026-04-18 12:12 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-04-18 17:24 ` Timur Tabi
2026-04-18 17:35 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-04-18 17:44 ` Timur Tabi
2026-04-18 20:43 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-04-20 1:09 ` sunliming
2026-04-20 1:09 ` sunliming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DHW9RZVWDN6Y.2G2RKSJMF5ESB@kernel.org \
--to=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=sunliming@kylinos.cn \
--cc=sunliming@linux.dev \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.