Re: [PATCH 0/6] b43: complete N-PHY rev 8 + radio 2057 rev 8 support

From: "Joshua Peisach" <jpeisach@ubuntu.com>
To: "Michael Büsch" <m@bues.ch>, "Joshua Peisach" <jpeisach@ubuntu.com>
Cc: "Alessio Ferri" <alessio.ferri@mythread.it>,
	<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, <b43-dev@lists.infradead.org>,
	<kvalo@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"b43-dev" <b43-dev-bounces@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] b43: complete N-PHY rev 8 + radio 2057 rev 8 support
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 19:13:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DIN19EEVA93R.2R8BXOUKWJ0GA@ubuntu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260519215244.2a0d2b29@barney>

On Tue May 19, 2026 at 3:52 PM EDT, Michael Büsch wrote:
> On Tue, 19 May 2026 15:32:44 -0400
> "Joshua Peisach" <jpeisach@ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue May 19, 2026 at 11:58 AM EDT, Michael Büsch wrote:
>> > On Mon, 18 May 2026 03:49:33 +0200
>> > Alessio Ferri <alessio.ferri@mythread.it> wrote:
>> >
>> > In general this looks Ok.
>> > From the style I assume that this is AI generated, right?
>> > If so, can you tell us a bit more about the inputs used for the AI?
>> > What information is this implementation based on?  
>> 
>> So... awkward question.
>
> Why?
>
>> Wasn't there just a conversation[1] about the
>> future development of this module, that was left off at "don't touch it
>> unless you're going to thouroughly test this",
>
> Sure. That's why I ask about the development methods used.
>
>> and now we are going to have a *LLM* work on this?
>
> I don't care whether code was generated with an LLM or not.
> What matters is the development methods used.

Fair enough. And it was tested anyway :) sorry for any perceived
arrogance.

I would tag Reviewed-by but I don't have a script to check the tables
(there probably is somewhere... it's a personal problem - a "skill
issue" as I sometimes like to call it).

-Josh