* [PATCH v2 1/2] uboot-sign: sign SPL FIT configurations instead of images @ 2026-05-26 9:40 Marta Rybczynska 2026-05-26 9:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] oe-selftest: fitimage: support new schema for uboot configuration signing Marta Rybczynska 2026-05-27 6:58 ` [OE-core] [PATCH v2 1/2] uboot-sign: sign SPL FIT configurations instead of images Mathieu Dubois-Briand 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Marta Rybczynska @ 2026-05-26 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-core; +Cc: Marta Rybczynska From: Marta Rybczynska <rybczynska@gmail.com> The SPL FIT signing path was signing individual images, but not the configuration. Introduce signing of configuration with images under a separate option SPL_SIGN_CONF, enabled by default. It implies changes in the DTB content. The old behaviour is possible with SPL_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL, but should be removed in a subsequent patch. Signed-off-by: Marta Rybczynska <rybczynska@gmail.com> --- meta/classes-recipe/uboot-sign.bbclass | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes-recipe/uboot-sign.bbclass b/meta/classes-recipe/uboot-sign.bbclass index 9cb5c6ccf3..d8e7252cc3 100644 --- a/meta/classes-recipe/uboot-sign.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes-recipe/uboot-sign.bbclass @@ -34,6 +34,16 @@ UBOOT_FITIMAGE_ENABLE ?= "0" # Signature activation - this requires UBOOT_FITIMAGE_ENABLE = "1" SPL_SIGN_ENABLE ?= "0" +# Sign the FIT configuration in the SPL signing flow. Configuration +# signatures bind the selected images and boot metadata together. +SPL_SIGN_CONF ?= "1" + +# Legacy compatibility knob for per-image signatures in the SPL FIT path. +# Individual image signatures do not protect the configuration metadata +# which selects and parameterizes the boot images. +# INSECURE, use at your own risk +SPL_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL ?= "0" + # Default value for deployment filenames. UBOOT_DTB_IMAGE ?= "u-boot-${MACHINE}-${PV}-${PR}.dtb" UBOOT_DTB_BINARY ?= "u-boot.dtb" @@ -325,7 +335,15 @@ uboot_fitimage_atf() { entry = <${UBOOT_FIT_ARM_TRUSTED_FIRMWARE_ENTRYPOINT}>; compression = "none"; EOF - if [ "${SPL_SIGN_ENABLE}" = "1" ] ; then + if [ "${SPL_SIGN_ENABLE}" = "1" ] && [ "${SPL_SIGN_CONF}" = "1" ] ; then + cat << EOF >> ${UBOOT_ITS} + hash-1 { + algo = "${UBOOT_FIT_HASH_ALG}"; + }; +EOF + fi + + if [ "${SPL_SIGN_ENABLE}" = "1" ] && [ "${SPL_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL}" = "1" ] ; then cat << EOF >> ${UBOOT_ITS} signature { algo = "${UBOOT_FIT_HASH_ALG},${UBOOT_FIT_SIGN_ALG}"; @@ -352,7 +370,15 @@ uboot_fitimage_tee() { entry = <${UBOOT_FIT_TEE_ENTRYPOINT}>; compression = "none"; EOF - if [ "${SPL_SIGN_ENABLE}" = "1" ] ; then + if [ "${SPL_SIGN_ENABLE}" = "1" ] && [ "${SPL_SIGN_CONF}" = "1" ] ; then + cat << EOF >> ${UBOOT_ITS} + hash-1 { + algo = "${UBOOT_FIT_HASH_ALG}"; + }; +EOF + fi + + if [ "${SPL_SIGN_ENABLE}" = "1" ] && [ "${SPL_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL}" = "1" ] ; then cat << EOF >> ${UBOOT_ITS} signature { algo = "${UBOOT_FIT_HASH_ALG},${UBOOT_FIT_SIGN_ALG}"; @@ -393,7 +419,15 @@ uboot_fitimage_assemble() { entry = <${UBOOT_FIT_UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT}>; EOF - if [ "${SPL_SIGN_ENABLE}" = "1" ] ; then + if [ "${SPL_SIGN_ENABLE}" = "1" ] && [ "${SPL_SIGN_CONF}" = "1" ] ; then + cat << EOF >> ${UBOOT_ITS} + hash-1 { + algo = "${UBOOT_FIT_HASH_ALG}"; + }; +EOF + fi + + if [ "${SPL_SIGN_ENABLE}" = "1" ] && [ "${SPL_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL}" = "1" ] ; then cat << EOF >> ${UBOOT_ITS} signature { algo = "${UBOOT_FIT_HASH_ALG},${UBOOT_FIT_SIGN_ALG}"; @@ -412,7 +446,15 @@ EOF compression = "none"; EOF - if [ "${SPL_SIGN_ENABLE}" = "1" ] ; then + if [ "${SPL_SIGN_ENABLE}" = "1" ] && [ "${SPL_SIGN_CONF}" = "1" ] ; then + cat << EOF >> ${UBOOT_ITS} + hash-1 { + algo = "${UBOOT_FIT_HASH_ALG}"; + }; +EOF + fi + + if [ "${SPL_SIGN_ENABLE}" = "1" ] && [ "${SPL_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL}" = "1" ] ; then cat << EOF >> ${UBOOT_ITS} signature { algo = "${UBOOT_FIT_HASH_ALG},${UBOOT_FIT_SIGN_ALG}"; @@ -442,8 +484,10 @@ EOF conf_loadables="${conf_loadables}${UBOOT_FIT_CONF_USER_LOADABLES}" fi + conf_sign_images='"loadables", "fdt"' if [ -n "${UBOOT_FIT_CONF_FIRMWARE}" ] ; then conf_firmware="firmware = \"${UBOOT_FIT_CONF_FIRMWARE}\";" + conf_sign_images='"firmware", "loadables", "fdt"' fi cat << EOF >> ${UBOOT_ITS} @@ -456,6 +500,19 @@ EOF ${conf_firmware} loadables = ${conf_loadables}; fdt = "fdt"; +EOF + + if [ "${SPL_SIGN_ENABLE}" = "1" ] && [ "${SPL_SIGN_CONF}" = "1" ] ; then + cat << EOF >> ${UBOOT_ITS} + signature { + algo = "${UBOOT_FIT_HASH_ALG},${UBOOT_FIT_SIGN_ALG}"; + key-name-hint = "${SPL_SIGN_KEYNAME}"; + sign-images = ${conf_sign_images}; + }; +EOF + fi + + cat << EOF >> ${UBOOT_ITS} }; }; }; @@ -470,6 +527,18 @@ EOF ${UBOOT_FITIMAGE_BINARY} if [ "${SPL_SIGN_ENABLE}" = "1" ] ; then + if [ "${SPL_SIGN_CONF}" != "1" ] && [ "${SPL_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL}" != "1" ] ; then + bbfatal "SPL_SIGN_ENABLE=1 requires SPL_SIGN_CONF=1 or SPL_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL=1" + fi + + if [ "${SPL_SIGN_CONF}" != "1" ] ; then + bbwarn "SPL_SIGN_CONF is disabled. FIT configuration signing is recommended for SPL verified boot." + fi + + if [ "${SPL_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL}" = "1" ] ; then + bbwarn "SPL_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL=1 is enabled for compatibility only. It is INSECURE. Individual image signatures do not replace configuration signing." + fi + if [ -n "${SPL_DTB_BINARY}" ] ; then # # Sign the U-boot FIT image and add public key to SPL dtb -- 2.47.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/2] oe-selftest: fitimage: support new schema for uboot configuration signing 2026-05-26 9:40 [PATCH v2 1/2] uboot-sign: sign SPL FIT configurations instead of images Marta Rybczynska @ 2026-05-26 9:40 ` Marta Rybczynska 2026-05-27 6:58 ` [OE-core] [PATCH v2 1/2] uboot-sign: sign SPL FIT configurations instead of images Mathieu Dubois-Briand 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Marta Rybczynska @ 2026-05-26 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-core; +Cc: Marta Rybczynska From: Marta Rybczynska <rybczynska@gmail.com> Modify testcases after adding signing of a configuration of uboot instead of various sections separately. This change includes an additional parameter to _check_signing that allows more flexible configuration and avoids assumptions on what section has, and which section does not have a signature - now they are defined in a data structure. Signed-off-by: Marta Rybczynska <rybczynska@gmail.com> --- meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/fitimage.py | 53 +++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/fitimage.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/fitimage.py index 3541c07520..ad523e93c1 100644 --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/fitimage.py +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/fitimage.py @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ class FitImageTestCase(OESelftestTestCase): self._is_req_dict_in_dict(sections, req_sections) # Call the signing related checks if the function is provided by a inherited class - self._check_signing(bb_vars, sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path) + self._check_signing(bb_vars, sections, req_sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path) def _get_req_its_paths(self, bb_vars): self.logger.error("This function needs to be implemented") @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ class FitImageTestCase(OESelftestTestCase): self.logger.error("This function needs to be implemented") return ({}, 0) - def _check_signing(self, bb_vars, sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path): + def _check_signing(self, bb_vars, sections, req_sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path): """Verify the signatures in the FIT image.""" self.fail("Function needs to be implemented by inheriting classes") @@ -789,7 +789,7 @@ class KernelFitImageBase(FitImageTestCase): num_signatures += 1 return (req_sections, num_signatures) - def _check_signing(self, bb_vars, sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path): + def _check_signing(self, bb_vars, sections, req_sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path): """Verify the signature nodes in the FIT image""" if bb_vars['UBOOT_SIGN_ENABLE'] == "1": self.logger.debug("Verifying signatures in the FIT image") @@ -809,6 +809,8 @@ class KernelFitImageBase(FitImageTestCase): for section, values in sections.items(): # Configuration nodes are always signed with UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME (if UBOOT_SIGN_ENABLE = "1") if section.startswith(bb_vars['FIT_CONF_PREFIX']): + if 'Sign algo' not in req_values[section]: + continue sign_algo = values.get('Sign algo', None) req_sign_algo = "%s,%s:%s" % (fit_hash_alg, fit_sign_alg, uboot_sign_keyname) self.assertEqual(sign_algo, req_sign_algo, 'Signature algorithm for %s not expected value' % section) @@ -1329,6 +1331,8 @@ class UBootFitImageTests(FitImageTestCase): 'SPL_MKIMAGE_SIGN_ARGS', 'SPL_SIGN_ENABLE', 'SPL_SIGN_KEYNAME', + 'SPL_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL', + 'SPL_SIGN_CONF', 'UBOOT_ARCH', 'UBOOT_DTB_BINARY', 'UBOOT_DTB_IMAGE', @@ -1382,10 +1386,14 @@ class UBootFitImageTests(FitImageTestCase): req_its_paths = [] for image in images: req_its_paths.append(['/', 'images', image]) - if bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_ENABLE'] == "1": + if bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_ENABLE'] == "1" and bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL'] == "1": req_its_paths.append(['/', 'images', image, 'signature']) + elif bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_ENABLE'] == "1" and bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_CONF'] == "1": + req_its_paths.append(['/', 'images', image, 'hash-1']) for configuration in configurations: req_its_paths.append(['/', 'configurations', configuration]) + if bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_ENABLE'] == "1" and bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_CONF'] == "1": + req_its_paths.append(['/', 'configurations', 'conf', 'signature']) return (req_its_paths, []) def _get_req_its_fields(self, bb_vars): @@ -1493,16 +1501,26 @@ class UBootFitImageTests(FitImageTestCase): uboot_fit_sign_alg = bb_vars['UBOOT_FIT_SIGN_ALG'] spl_sign_enable = bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_ENABLE'] spl_sign_keyname = bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_KEYNAME'] + spl_sign_conf = bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_CONF'] + spl_sign_individual = bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL'] num_signatures = 0 if spl_sign_enable == "1": for section in req_sections: - if not section.startswith('conf'): - req_sections[section]['Sign algo'] = "%s,%s:%s" % \ - (uboot_fit_hash_alg, uboot_fit_sign_alg, spl_sign_keyname) - num_signatures += 1 + if section.startswith('conf'): + if spl_sign_conf == "1": + req_sections[section]['Sign algo'] = "%s,%s:%s" % \ + (uboot_fit_hash_alg, uboot_fit_sign_alg, spl_sign_keyname) + num_signatures += 1 + else: + if spl_sign_conf == "1": + req_sections[section]['Hash algo'] = uboot_fit_hash_alg + elif spl_sign_individual == "1": + req_sections[section]['Sign algo'] = "%s,%s:%s" % \ + (uboot_fit_hash_alg, uboot_fit_sign_alg, spl_sign_keyname) + num_signatures += 1 return (req_sections, num_signatures) - def _check_signing(self, bb_vars, sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path): + def _check_signing(self, bb_vars, sections, req_sections, num_signatures, uboot_tools_bindir, fitimage_path): if bb_vars['UBOOT_FITIMAGE_ENABLE'] == '1' and bb_vars['SPL_SIGN_ENABLE'] == "1": self.logger.debug("Verifying signatures in the FIT image") else: @@ -1515,16 +1533,13 @@ class UBootFitImageTests(FitImageTestCase): fit_sign_alg_len = FitImageTestCase.MKIMAGE_SIGNATURE_LENGTHS[uboot_fit_sign_alg] for section, values in sections.items(): # Configuration nodes are always signed with UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME (if UBOOT_SIGN_ENABLE = "1") - if section.startswith("conf"): - # uboot-sign does not sign configuration nodes - pass - else: - # uboot-sign does not add hash nodes, only image signatures - sign_algo = values.get('Sign algo', None) - req_sign_algo = "%s,%s:%s" % (uboot_fit_hash_alg, uboot_fit_sign_alg, spl_sign_keyname) - self.assertEqual(sign_algo, req_sign_algo, 'Signature algorithm for %s not expected value' % section) - sign_value = values.get('Sign value', None) - self.assertEqual(len(sign_value), fit_sign_alg_len, 'Signature value for section %s not expected length' % section) + if 'Sign algo' not in req_sections[section]: + continue + sign_algo = values.get('Sign algo', None) + req_sign_algo = "%s,%s:%s" % (uboot_fit_hash_alg, uboot_fit_sign_alg, spl_sign_keyname) + self.assertEqual(sign_algo, req_sign_algo, 'Signature algorithm for %s not expected value' % section) + sign_value = values.get('Sign value', None) + self.assertEqual(len(sign_value), fit_sign_alg_len, 'Signature value for section %s not expected length' % section) # Search for the string passed to mkimage in each signed section of the FIT image. # Looks like mkimage supports to add a comment but does not support to read it back. -- 2.47.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 1/2] uboot-sign: sign SPL FIT configurations instead of images 2026-05-26 9:40 [PATCH v2 1/2] uboot-sign: sign SPL FIT configurations instead of images Marta Rybczynska 2026-05-26 9:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] oe-selftest: fitimage: support new schema for uboot configuration signing Marta Rybczynska @ 2026-05-27 6:58 ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand 2026-05-27 9:39 ` Marta Rybczynska 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Dubois-Briand @ 2026-05-27 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: rybczynska, openembedded-core On Tue May 26, 2026 at 11:40 AM CEST, Marta Rybczynska via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > From: Marta Rybczynska <rybczynska@gmail.com> > > The SPL FIT signing path was signing individual images, but not the configuration. > > Introduce signing of configuration with images under a separate option SPL_SIGN_CONF, > enabled by default. It implies changes in the DTB content. > > The old behaviour is possible with SPL_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL, but should be removed in > a subsequent patch. > > Signed-off-by: Marta Rybczynska <rybczynska@gmail.com> Hi Marta, Thanks for the new version. I believe we still have two selftest failures because of it: 2026-05-26 16:34:33,908 - oe-selftest - INFO - fitimage.UBootFitImageTests.test_sign_standalone_uboot_atf_tee_fit_image (subunit.RemotedTestCase) 2026-05-26 16:34:33,909 - oe-selftest - INFO - ... FAIL ... ERROR: u-boot-1_2026.04-r0 do_uboot_assemble_fitimage: Execution of '/srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/oe-selftest-armhost/build/build-st-2700759/tmp/work/qemuarm-poky-linux-gnueabi/u-boot/2026.04/temp/run.do_uboot_assemble_fitimage.3572291' failed with exit code 1 ... | Signature written to 'u-boot-fitImage', node '/configurations/conf/signature' | Public key written to 'spl/u-boot-spl.dtb', node '/signature/key-spl-oe-selftest' | Signature check bad (error 1) | Verifying Hash Integrity for node 'conf'... sha256,rsa2048:spl-oe-selftest+ | sha256,rsa2048:spl-oe-selftest- | error! | Verification failed for '(null)' hash node in 'conf' config node | Failed to verify required signature 'key-spl-cascaded-oe-selftest' | WARNING: exit code 1 from a shell command. ... 2026-05-26 16:35:33,469 - oe-selftest - INFO - fitimage.UBootFitImageTests.test_sign_standalone_uboot_fit_image (subunit.RemotedTestCase) 2026-05-26 16:35:33,469 - oe-selftest - INFO - ... FAIL ... ERROR: u-boot-1_2026.04-r0 do_uboot_assemble_fitimage: Execution of '/srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/oe-selftest-armhost/build/build-st-2700759/tmp/work/qemuarm-poky-linux-gnueabi/u-boot/2026.04/temp/run.do_uboot_assemble_fitimage.3689059' failed with exit code 1 ... | Signature written to 'u-boot-fitImage', node '/configurations/conf/signature' | Public key written to 'spl/u-boot-spl.dtb', node '/signature/key-spl-oe-selftest' | Signature check bad (error 1) | Verifying Hash Integrity for node 'conf'... sha256,rsa2048:spl-oe-selftest+ | sha256,rsa2048:spl-oe-selftest- | error! | Verification failed for '(null)' hash node in 'conf' config node | Failed to verify required signature 'key-spl-cascaded-oe-selftest' | WARNING: exit code 1 from a shell command. https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/23/builds/3999 https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/35/builds/3905 https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/48/builds/3770 Can you have a look at the issue? Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 1/2] uboot-sign: sign SPL FIT configurations instead of images 2026-05-27 6:58 ` [OE-core] [PATCH v2 1/2] uboot-sign: sign SPL FIT configurations instead of images Mathieu Dubois-Briand @ 2026-05-27 9:39 ` Marta Rybczynska 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Marta Rybczynska @ 2026-05-27 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mathieu Dubois-Briand; +Cc: openembedded-core [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3231 bytes --] On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 8:58 AM Mathieu Dubois-Briand < mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com> wrote: > On Tue May 26, 2026 at 11:40 AM CEST, Marta Rybczynska via > lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > From: Marta Rybczynska <rybczynska@gmail.com> > > > > The SPL FIT signing path was signing individual images, but not the > configuration. > > > > Introduce signing of configuration with images under a separate option > SPL_SIGN_CONF, > > enabled by default. It implies changes in the DTB content. > > > > The old behaviour is possible with SPL_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL, but should be > removed in > > a subsequent patch. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marta Rybczynska <rybczynska@gmail.com> > > Hi Marta, > > Thanks for the new version. I believe we still have two selftest > failures because of it: > > 2026-05-26 16:34:33,908 - oe-selftest - INFO - > fitimage.UBootFitImageTests.test_sign_standalone_uboot_atf_tee_fit_image > (subunit.RemotedTestCase) > 2026-05-26 16:34:33,909 - oe-selftest - INFO - ... FAIL > ... > ERROR: u-boot-1_2026.04-r0 do_uboot_assemble_fitimage: Execution of > '/srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/oe-selftest-armhost/build/build-st-2700759/tmp/work/qemuarm-poky-linux-gnueabi/u-boot/2026.04/temp/run.do_uboot_assemble_fitimage.3572291' > failed with exit code 1 > ... > | Signature written to 'u-boot-fitImage', node > '/configurations/conf/signature' > | Public key written to 'spl/u-boot-spl.dtb', node > '/signature/key-spl-oe-selftest' > | Signature check bad (error 1) > | Verifying Hash Integrity for node 'conf'... > sha256,rsa2048:spl-oe-selftest+ > | sha256,rsa2048:spl-oe-selftest- > | error! > | Verification failed for '(null)' hash node in 'conf' config node > | Failed to verify required signature 'key-spl-cascaded-oe-selftest' > | WARNING: exit code 1 from a shell command. > ... > 2026-05-26 16:35:33,469 - oe-selftest - INFO - > fitimage.UBootFitImageTests.test_sign_standalone_uboot_fit_image > (subunit.RemotedTestCase) > 2026-05-26 16:35:33,469 - oe-selftest - INFO - ... FAIL > ... > ERROR: u-boot-1_2026.04-r0 do_uboot_assemble_fitimage: Execution of > '/srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/oe-selftest-armhost/build/build-st-2700759/tmp/work/qemuarm-poky-linux-gnueabi/u-boot/2026.04/temp/run.do_uboot_assemble_fitimage.3689059' > failed with exit code 1 > ... > | Signature written to 'u-boot-fitImage', node > '/configurations/conf/signature' > | Public key written to 'spl/u-boot-spl.dtb', node > '/signature/key-spl-oe-selftest' > | Signature check bad (error 1) > | Verifying Hash Integrity for node 'conf'... > sha256,rsa2048:spl-oe-selftest+ > | sha256,rsa2048:spl-oe-selftest- > | error! > | Verification failed for '(null)' hash node in 'conf' config node > | Failed to verify required signature 'key-spl-cascaded-oe-selftest' > | WARNING: exit code 1 from a shell command. > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/23/builds/3999 > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/35/builds/3905 > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/48/builds/3770 > > Can you have a look at the issue? Looking into it. Those tests work in my setup. To be continued. Regards, Marta [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4416 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-27 9:39 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-05-26 9:40 [PATCH v2 1/2] uboot-sign: sign SPL FIT configurations instead of images Marta Rybczynska 2026-05-26 9:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] oe-selftest: fitimage: support new schema for uboot configuration signing Marta Rybczynska 2026-05-27 6:58 ` [OE-core] [PATCH v2 1/2] uboot-sign: sign SPL FIT configurations instead of images Mathieu Dubois-Briand 2026-05-27 9:39 ` Marta Rybczynska
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.