From: "Troy Mitchell" <troy.mitchell@linux.dev>
To: "Junzhong Pan" <panjunzhong@linux.spacemit.com>,
"Thinh Nguyen" <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <spacemit@lists.linux.dev>,
"Troy Mitchell" <troy.mitchell@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: core: resume xHCI child on runtime resume in host mode
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 22:16:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DL9ZZ8F7HTZT.1IUMD1ECSOZXL@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908-resume-xhci-v1-1-aca107602e9c@linux.spacemit.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4032 bytes --]
On Tue Sep 8, 2026 at 10:01 PM +08, Junzhong Pan wrote:
> USB controller runtime suspend halts the controller on disconnection.
> It relies on platforms with custom connection notification to start
> the controller again.
>
> The host branch of dwc3_runtime_resume() does nothing currently. There
> are two paths that can trigger a runtime resume of the dwc3 core in
> host mode:
>
> (a) Wake lands on the xHCI child (DT platforms, e.g. Qualcomm, i.MX8MP)
> A platform wakeup IRQ fires and the glue handler calls
> pm_runtime_resume(&xhci->dev). Runtime PM walks upward, resumes
> the dwc3 parent first, then resumes xHCI. Both wake correctly.
>
> (b) Wake lands on the dwc3 parent (ACPI platforms)
> When an ACPI Notify(ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_WAKE) targets the dwc3
> parent device -- for example via a Generic Event Device on a
> hardware-reduced platform where dwc3 is enumerated as an ACPI
> device without a glue driver -- the ACPI core turns this into
> pm_request_resume(dwc3_dev). Runtime PM does not propagate resume
> downward, so the xHCI child stays suspended. Root hub polling is
> never re-armed, and a device plugged in while suspended is silently
> dropped.
>
> This patch fills in the host branch to cover case (b) by requesting an
> async resume of the xHCI child so xhci_resume() can restore the port
> state machine and re-arm root hub polling. Glue drivers in case (a)
> resume xHCI directly, an extra call introduced by this change, but
> runtime PM can serialize those requests and skip device already active,
> so the extra resume call is safe. Those calls can be replaced with
> resume calls to dwc3 device later.
>
> Tested on SpacemiT K3 Pico-ITX, covering both wakeup paths: an ACPI
> boot with a GED device notifying the dwc3 node (HID 808622B7), and a
> DT boot with a modified dwc3-generic-plat driver exposing a wakeup IRQ
> similar to dwc3-qcom.c and dwc3-imx8mp.c. This is not validation on
> actual Qualcomm or i.MX8MP hardware, changing those drivers would still
> need platform-specific testing.
>
> Acked-by: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
> Assisted-by: Opencode:claude-opus-5
> Signed-off-by: Junzhong Pan <panjunzhong@linux.spacemit.com>
> ---
> Changes since RFC:
> - add Assisted-By tag and collect tag
> - refine the commit message and comments as suggested
>
> Link to RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20260811090817.109350-1-panjunzhong@linux.spacemit.com/
> ---
> drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> index fd5c2cd36c59..76883dc6184c 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> @@ -2739,6 +2739,18 @@ int dwc3_runtime_resume(struct dwc3 *dwc)
> }
> break;
> case DWC3_GCTL_PRTCAP_HOST:
> + /*
> + * Only the xHCI child's resume re-arms root hub polling, which
> + * is what rediscovers a device plugged in while suspended.
> + * Runtime PM doesn't resume children, so request it here.
> + * Keep it asynchronous to avoid waiting for the parent's resume
> + * callback to finish from inside it. Glue drivers may also
> + * resume xHCI directly, but runtime PM will serialize those
> + * requests and skips an already-active device.
> + */
> + if (dwc->xhci)
> + pm_request_resume(&dwc->xhci->dev);
> + break;
Could we also check a parent-only resume with no USB wake event? For
example, reading the DWC3 debugfs lsp_dump file calls
pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dwc->dev). With both devices suspended, this
change would wake xHCI too.
Would both devices return to autosuspend after the read and still
detect a subsequent plug-in? This would help cover the non-wakeup
case.
> default:
> /* do nothing */
> break;
>
> ---
> base-commit: cee9395acd8043be0644b25c34bfa86623f2b935
> change-id: 20260908-resume-xhci-0fa34ff9b332
>
> Best regards,
--
Troy Mitchell
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 273 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Troy Mitchell" <troy.mitchell@linux.dev>
To: "Junzhong Pan" <panjunzhong@linux.spacemit.com>,
"Thinh Nguyen" <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <spacemit@lists.linux.dev>,
"Troy Mitchell" <troy.mitchell@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: core: resume xHCI child on runtime resume in host mode
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 22:16:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DL9ZZ8F7HTZT.1IUMD1ECSOZXL@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908-resume-xhci-v1-1-aca107602e9c@linux.spacemit.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4032 bytes --]
On Tue Sep 8, 2026 at 10:01 PM +08, Junzhong Pan wrote:
> USB controller runtime suspend halts the controller on disconnection.
> It relies on platforms with custom connection notification to start
> the controller again.
>
> The host branch of dwc3_runtime_resume() does nothing currently. There
> are two paths that can trigger a runtime resume of the dwc3 core in
> host mode:
>
> (a) Wake lands on the xHCI child (DT platforms, e.g. Qualcomm, i.MX8MP)
> A platform wakeup IRQ fires and the glue handler calls
> pm_runtime_resume(&xhci->dev). Runtime PM walks upward, resumes
> the dwc3 parent first, then resumes xHCI. Both wake correctly.
>
> (b) Wake lands on the dwc3 parent (ACPI platforms)
> When an ACPI Notify(ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_WAKE) targets the dwc3
> parent device -- for example via a Generic Event Device on a
> hardware-reduced platform where dwc3 is enumerated as an ACPI
> device without a glue driver -- the ACPI core turns this into
> pm_request_resume(dwc3_dev). Runtime PM does not propagate resume
> downward, so the xHCI child stays suspended. Root hub polling is
> never re-armed, and a device plugged in while suspended is silently
> dropped.
>
> This patch fills in the host branch to cover case (b) by requesting an
> async resume of the xHCI child so xhci_resume() can restore the port
> state machine and re-arm root hub polling. Glue drivers in case (a)
> resume xHCI directly, an extra call introduced by this change, but
> runtime PM can serialize those requests and skip device already active,
> so the extra resume call is safe. Those calls can be replaced with
> resume calls to dwc3 device later.
>
> Tested on SpacemiT K3 Pico-ITX, covering both wakeup paths: an ACPI
> boot with a GED device notifying the dwc3 node (HID 808622B7), and a
> DT boot with a modified dwc3-generic-plat driver exposing a wakeup IRQ
> similar to dwc3-qcom.c and dwc3-imx8mp.c. This is not validation on
> actual Qualcomm or i.MX8MP hardware, changing those drivers would still
> need platform-specific testing.
>
> Acked-by: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
> Assisted-by: Opencode:claude-opus-5
> Signed-off-by: Junzhong Pan <panjunzhong@linux.spacemit.com>
> ---
> Changes since RFC:
> - add Assisted-By tag and collect tag
> - refine the commit message and comments as suggested
>
> Link to RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20260811090817.109350-1-panjunzhong@linux.spacemit.com/
> ---
> drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> index fd5c2cd36c59..76883dc6184c 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> @@ -2739,6 +2739,18 @@ int dwc3_runtime_resume(struct dwc3 *dwc)
> }
> break;
> case DWC3_GCTL_PRTCAP_HOST:
> + /*
> + * Only the xHCI child's resume re-arms root hub polling, which
> + * is what rediscovers a device plugged in while suspended.
> + * Runtime PM doesn't resume children, so request it here.
> + * Keep it asynchronous to avoid waiting for the parent's resume
> + * callback to finish from inside it. Glue drivers may also
> + * resume xHCI directly, but runtime PM will serialize those
> + * requests and skips an already-active device.
> + */
> + if (dwc->xhci)
> + pm_request_resume(&dwc->xhci->dev);
> + break;
Could we also check a parent-only resume with no USB wake event? For
example, reading the DWC3 debugfs lsp_dump file calls
pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dwc->dev). With both devices suspended, this
change would wake xHCI too.
Would both devices return to autosuspend after the read and still
detect a subsequent plug-in? This would help cover the non-wakeup
case.
> default:
> /* do nothing */
> break;
>
> ---
> base-commit: cee9395acd8043be0644b25c34bfa86623f2b935
> change-id: 20260908-resume-xhci-0fa34ff9b332
>
> Best regards,
--
Troy Mitchell
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 273 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 14:01 [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: core: resume xHCI child on runtime resume in host mode Junzhong Pan
2026-09-08 14:01 ` Junzhong Pan
2026-09-08 14:16 ` Troy Mitchell [this message]
2026-09-08 14:16 ` Troy Mitchell
2026-09-09 12:28 ` Junzhong Pan
2026-09-09 12:28 ` Junzhong Pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DL9ZZ8F7HTZT.1IUMD1ECSOZXL@linux.dev \
--to=troy.mitchell@linux.dev \
--cc=Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=panjunzhong@linux.spacemit.com \
--cc=spacemit@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.