* [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/2] bpf: Fix task work scheduling race
@ 2026-09-22 10:00 Yun Lu
2026-09-22 10:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] bpf: Fix task work scheduling and callback race Yun Lu
2026-09-22 10:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add task work scheduling race test Yun Lu
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yun Lu @ 2026-09-22 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ast, daniel, andrii, eddyz87, memxor, martin.lau, song,
yonghong.song, jolsa, emil, ihor.solodrai
Cc: yatsenko, bpf
From: Yun Lu <luyun@kylinos.cn>
This series fixes a race in the bpf_task_work scheduling kfuncs and
adds a regression test for it.
bpf_task_work_irq() publishes a task_work callback before it finishes
using the scheduling round. A target task running on another CPU can
execute the callback, reset ctx->task and publish STANDBY before the
irq_work handler performs its final state transition. Concurrent map
value deletion can then make the handler call task_work_cancel() with a
NULL task. The early STANDBY transition can also let a new round reuse
the context while the old irq_work handler is still running.
Patch 1 captures an independent task reference in the scheduling
handler before task_work_add() and uses it for the post-add
cancellation, so the handler never reads ctx->task after the callback
may have reset it. A BUSY check in acquire keeps a new round from
starting while a previous handler is still running, which prevents a
delayed handler from consuming the new round's SCHEDULING state. The
scheduling irq_work is initialized once at context creation. No
fields or states are added to the context, the callback stays
non-blocking, and the cancellation and destruction paths are unchanged.
Patch 2 adds a 1500-round cross-CPU regression test covering context
reuse, callback completion followed by deletion, and deletion racing
with scheduling.
Changes since v2:
- Kernel: drop irq_work_sync() from the callback and both
WARN_ON_ONCE() checks, as requested in review. Following the
suggested direction, the scheduling handler now takes its own task
reference around task_work_add() and the post-add cancellation; the
temporary ctx refcount from v2 is gone as well. The callback ends
up unchanged from upstream.
- The BUSY check in acquire is kept: without it a handler delayed
between task_work_add() and its state cmpxchg can flip the next
round into a bogus SCHEDULED, which later routes map-value deletion
into task_work_cancel() with an already-reset ctx->task.
- Selftest is unchanged apart from the rebase.
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260921101453.69273-1-luyun_611@163.com/
Changes since v1 :
- Kernel: rework the fix per review feedback. Replace the round_refs
ownership counter and the extra irq_work objects with a completion
edge: the callback claims RUNNING and waits for the scheduling
irq_work via irq_work_sync(), plus one temporary reference from the
existing ctx refcount and a BUSY check covering the add-failure
path. No context fields or states are added.
- Selftest: address review feedback (single packed result store,
bounded thread-start wait, tolerate the expected deletion-race
outcomes).
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260918080014.54012-1-luyun_611@163.com/
Testing:
- Built with KASAN, lockdep, PROVE_RCU, DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP and
KMEMLEAK; test_progs -t task_work and 900 stress rounds in QEMU are
clean, zero leaks reported.
- Replayed the deterministic reproducer (debug-delay only, not part of
the series): without the fix it panics reliably in
task_work_cancel(); with the fix the callback staying non-blocking
and the guest stays healthy.
Yun Lu (2):
bpf: Fix task work scheduling and callback race
selftests/bpf: Add task work scheduling race test
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 39 ++-
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_work.c | 283 ++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/task_work_race.c | 126 ++++++++
3 files changed, 437 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_work_race.c
base-commit: 5dd1818b15d98d4a20806cd00b1b40320b06004f
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] bpf: Fix task work scheduling and callback race
2026-09-22 10:00 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/2] bpf: Fix task work scheduling race Yun Lu
@ 2026-09-22 10:00 ` Yun Lu
2026-09-23 17:46 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-09-23 23:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-22 10:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add task work scheduling race test Yun Lu
1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yun Lu @ 2026-09-22 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ast, daniel, andrii, eddyz87, memxor, martin.lau, song,
yonghong.song, jolsa, emil, ihor.solodrai
Cc: yatsenko, bpf
From: Yun Lu <luyun@kylinos.cn>
bpf_task_work_irq() publishes a task_work callback before changing the
context from SCHEDULING to SCHEDULED. The callback can therefore run on
another CPU while the irq_work handler is still using the same scheduling
round.
Nothing currently orders the handler's use of ctx->task against
bpf_task_work_ctx_reset(). The callback can reset ctx->task and publish
STANDBY before the handler resumes, allowing map-value deletion to make the
handler pass NULL to task_work_cancel(). Publishing STANDBY this early
also allows a new round to reuse the context and irq_work while the old
handler is still running.
One concrete interleaving is:
1. CPU 0 changes PENDING to SCHEDULING in bpf_task_work_irq() and
successfully publishes ctx->work with task_work_add(), but has not yet
attempted the SCHEDULING-to-SCHEDULED transition.
2. The target task on CPU 1 runs the callback. It changes SCHEDULING to
RUNNING, executes the BPF subprogram, then bpf_task_work_ctx_reset()
releases ctx->task and sets it to NULL. The callback changes RUNNING
to STANDBY and drops its ctx reference.
3. CPU 2 deletes the map value. bpf_task_work_cancel_and_free() changes
STANDBY to FREED. Since the old state is not SCHEDULED, it does not
queue cancellation and drops the map's ctx reference.
4. CPU 0 resumes. Its SCHEDULING-to-SCHEDULED cmpxchg observes FREED, so
bpf_task_work_cancel() calls task_work_cancel(NULL, &ctx->work).
If deletion changes the state to FREED before the callback runs, the
callback instead takes its FREED exit and may drop the last ctx reference.
The destroy path then resets ctx->task, producing the same NULL dereference
when CPU 0 resumes.
A controlled reproducer that delays CPU 0 between task_work_add() and the
state cmpxchg triggered the following fault on a v7.3-rc3 based x86-64 KVM
guest:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000890
#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
RIP: task_work_cancel+0xd/0xa0
RDI: 0000000000000000
CR2: 0000000000000890
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
bpf_task_work_irq+0x95/0x100
irq_work_run_list+0x4f/0x90
irq_work_run+0x18/0x50
__sysvec_irq_work+0x18/0xb0
sysvec_irq_work+0x66/0x80
</IRQ>
0x890 is the task_struct::task_works offset in that build. It is read by
task_work_pending() through the NULL task argument. The rcu_read_lock() in
bpf_task_work_irq() only keeps ctx memory alive; it does not retain
ctx->task. A NULL check would still race with releasing the task
reference.
Fix this by taking a task reference in the scheduling irq_work before
publishing the callback. Use the captured task for cancellation at the
handler tail, so the task remains valid even if the callback or destroy
path has reset ctx->task. Release the reference on every add success and
failure path.
The asynchronous cancellation path is queued only after deletion wins
SCHEDULED-to-FREED. In that case the callback observes FREED and cannot
reset ctx->task, while the map's transferred ctx reference prevents the
destroy path from doing so. It can therefore safely pass ctx->task to the
same cancellation helper. The two cancellation paths are mutually
exclusive: the scheduling handler handles deletion from SCHEDULING, and
the asynchronous path handles deletion from SCHEDULED.
The callback or add-failure path can publish STANDBY before the scheduling
irq_work returns. Initialize irq_work when the context is created and
reject a new round while it is still BUSY. This prevents the old handler
from consuming the new round's SCHEDULING state and publishing a false
SCHEDULED state, and prevents invocations on different CPUs from
overlapping on the same context.
This keeps the task-work callback non-blocking and adds no context fields
or states.
Fixes: 38aa7003e369 ("bpf: task work scheduling kfuncs")
Reported-by: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn>
Suggested-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yun Lu <luyun@kylinos.cn>
---
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index b3cc5c8fc875..d8bea7538de5 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -4437,7 +4437,8 @@ static void bpf_task_work_ctx_put(struct bpf_task_work_ctx *ctx)
}
}
-static void bpf_task_work_cancel(struct bpf_task_work_ctx *ctx)
+static void bpf_task_work_cancel(struct bpf_task_work_ctx *ctx,
+ struct task_struct *task)
{
/*
* Scheduled task_work callback holds ctx ref, so if we successfully
@@ -4445,7 +4446,7 @@ static void bpf_task_work_cancel(struct bpf_task_work_ctx *ctx)
* cancel, callback will inevitably run or has already completed
* running, and it would have taken care of its ctx ref itself.
*/
- if (task_work_cancel(ctx->task, &ctx->work))
+ if (task_work_cancel(task, &ctx->work))
bpf_task_work_ctx_put(ctx);
}
@@ -4486,6 +4487,7 @@ static void bpf_task_work_callback(struct callback_head *cb)
static void bpf_task_work_irq(struct irq_work *irq_work)
{
struct bpf_task_work_ctx *ctx = container_of(irq_work, struct bpf_task_work_ctx, irq_work);
+ struct task_struct *task;
enum bpf_task_work_state state;
int err;
@@ -4496,7 +4498,8 @@ static void bpf_task_work_irq(struct irq_work *irq_work)
return;
}
- err = task_work_add(ctx->task, &ctx->work, ctx->mode);
+ task = get_task_struct(ctx->task);
+ err = task_work_add(task, &ctx->work, ctx->mode);
if (err) {
bpf_task_work_ctx_reset(ctx);
/*
@@ -4505,19 +4508,20 @@ static void bpf_task_work_irq(struct irq_work *irq_work)
*/
(void)cmpxchg(&ctx->state, BPF_TW_SCHEDULING, BPF_TW_STANDBY);
bpf_task_work_ctx_put(ctx);
+ put_task_struct(task);
return;
}
/*
- * It's technically possible for just scheduled task_work callback to
- * complete running by now, going SCHEDULING -> RUNNING and then
- * dropping its ctx refcount. Instead of capturing an extra ref just
- * to protect below ctx->state access, we rely on rcu_read_lock
- * above to prevent kfree_rcu from freeing ctx before we return.
+ * The callback may have completed and reset ctx->task already. Keep the
+ * captured task alive until this invocation is done with cancellation.
+ * The RCU read-side section keeps ctx memory alive until then.
*/
state = cmpxchg(&ctx->state, BPF_TW_SCHEDULING, BPF_TW_SCHEDULED);
if (state == BPF_TW_FREED)
- bpf_task_work_cancel(ctx); /* clean up if we switched into FREED state */
+ bpf_task_work_cancel(ctx, task); /* clean up if we switched into FREED state */
+
+ put_task_struct(task);
}
static struct bpf_task_work_ctx *bpf_task_work_fetch_ctx(struct bpf_task_work *tw,
@@ -4537,6 +4541,7 @@ static struct bpf_task_work_ctx *bpf_task_work_fetch_ctx(struct bpf_task_work *t
memset(ctx, 0, sizeof(*ctx));
refcount_set(&ctx->refcnt, 1); /* map's own ref */
ctx->state = BPF_TW_STANDBY;
+ init_irq_work(&ctx->irq_work, bpf_task_work_irq);
old_ctx = cmpxchg(&twk->ctx, NULL, ctx);
if (old_ctx) {
@@ -4579,6 +4584,18 @@ static struct bpf_task_work_ctx *bpf_task_work_acquire_ctx(struct bpf_task_work
bpf_task_work_ctx_put(ctx);
return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
}
+ /*
+ * The callback or add-failure path can publish STANDBY before the
+ * scheduling irq_work returns. Do not let a new round reuse the context
+ * until BUSY clears. Otherwise the old handler can consume the new
+ * round's SCHEDULING state and publish a false SCHEDULED state, and two
+ * invocations can overlap on different CPUs.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(irq_work_is_busy(&ctx->irq_work))) {
+ (void)cmpxchg(&ctx->state, BPF_TW_PENDING, BPF_TW_STANDBY);
+ bpf_task_work_ctx_put(ctx);
+ return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
+ }
/*
* If no process or bpffs is holding a reference to the map, no new callbacks should be
@@ -4628,7 +4645,6 @@ static int bpf_task_work_schedule(struct task_struct *task, struct bpf_task_work
ctx->map = map;
ctx->map_val = (void *)tw - map->record->task_work_off;
init_task_work(&ctx->work, bpf_task_work_callback);
- init_irq_work(&ctx->irq_work, bpf_task_work_irq);
irq_work_queue(&ctx->irq_work);
return 0;
@@ -4777,7 +4793,8 @@ static void bpf_task_work_cancel_scheduled(struct irq_work *irq_work)
{
struct bpf_task_work_ctx *ctx = container_of(irq_work, struct bpf_task_work_ctx, irq_work);
- bpf_task_work_cancel(ctx); /* this might put task_work callback's ref */
+ /* SCHEDULED -> FREED keeps ctx->task stable until this runs. */
+ bpf_task_work_cancel(ctx, ctx->task); /* this might put task_work callback's ref */
bpf_task_work_ctx_put(ctx); /* and here we put map's own ref that was transferred to us */
}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add task work scheduling race test
2026-09-22 10:00 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/2] bpf: Fix task work scheduling race Yun Lu
2026-09-22 10:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] bpf: Fix task work scheduling and callback race Yun Lu
@ 2026-09-22 10:00 ` Yun Lu
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yun Lu @ 2026-09-22 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ast, daniel, andrii, eddyz87, memxor, martin.lau, song,
yonghong.song, jolsa, emil, ihor.solodrai
Cc: yatsenko, bpf
From: Yun Lu <luyun@kylinos.cn>
Exercise task-work scheduling, callback completion and map-value deletion
on separate execution contexts. Rotate through context reuse, deletion
after callback completion and deletion immediately before scheduling.
These variants stress the SCHEDULING/SCHEDULED cancellation window and
reuse of the same context across rounds.
Use READY and a single packed RESULT containing the generation and error,
so scheduling errors cannot be missed without relying on ordering between
separate map slots. Give every callback a unique generation so a late
callback cannot satisfy a later assertion. Retry transient -EBUSY results
while a previous callback wrapper is finishing. In the immediate-delete
variant, accept -EBUSY and a follow-up -ENOENT when deletion wins the race.
Select two CPUs from the process affinity mask, bound the thread-start
wait and use an atomic stop handshake. Skip when fewer than two CPUs are
available, while reporting thread creation or affinity setup errors as
test failures.
Signed-off-by: Yun Lu <luyun@kylinos.cn>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_work.c | 283 ++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/task_work_race.c | 126 ++++++++
2 files changed, 409 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_work_race.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_work.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_work.c
index 774b31a5f6ca..ff56976f4226 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_work.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_work.c
@@ -5,10 +5,14 @@
#include <stdio.h>
#include "task_work.skel.h"
#include "task_work_fail.skel.h"
+#include "task_work_race.skel.h"
#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <linux/perf_event.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <time.h>
+#include <pthread.h>
+#include <sched.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
static int perf_event_open(__u32 type, __u64 config, int pid)
{
@@ -155,3 +159,282 @@ void test_task_work(void)
RUN_TESTS(task_work_fail);
}
+
+#define TASK_WORK_RACE_ROUNDS 1500
+
+/* Must match progs/task_work_race.c. */
+enum task_work_race_status {
+ RACE_ARM_SEQ,
+ RACE_READY_SEQ,
+ /* High 32 bits hold the sequence, low 32 bits the signed error. */
+ RACE_RESULT,
+};
+
+struct task_work_race_value {
+ __u32 seq;
+ char data[60];
+ struct bpf_task_work tw;
+};
+
+struct task_work_race_ctx {
+ int stop;
+ int setup_err;
+ int trigger_tid;
+ int target_tid;
+ int trigger_cpu;
+ int target_cpu;
+};
+
+static int task_work_race_pin_cpu(int cpu)
+{
+ cpu_set_t set;
+
+ CPU_ZERO(&set);
+ CPU_SET(cpu, &set);
+ return pthread_setaffinity_np(pthread_self(), sizeof(set), &set);
+}
+
+static void *task_work_race_trigger(void *arg)
+{
+ struct task_work_race_ctx *ctx = arg;
+ int err;
+
+ err = task_work_race_pin_cpu(ctx->trigger_cpu);
+ if (err)
+ __atomic_store_n(&ctx->setup_err, err, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
+ __atomic_store_n(&ctx->trigger_tid, syscall(__NR_gettid),
+ __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
+ while (!__atomic_load_n(&ctx->stop, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE))
+ getppid();
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static void *task_work_race_target(void *arg)
+{
+ struct task_work_race_ctx *ctx = arg;
+ int err;
+
+ err = task_work_race_pin_cpu(ctx->target_cpu);
+ if (err)
+ __atomic_store_n(&ctx->setup_err, err, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
+ __atomic_store_n(&ctx->target_tid, syscall(__NR_gettid),
+ __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
+ while (!__atomic_load_n(&ctx->stop, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE))
+ getppid();
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static int task_work_race_status(struct task_work_race *skel, int idx,
+ __s64 *value)
+{
+ return bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.status), &idx,
+ value);
+}
+
+static int task_work_race_set_status(struct task_work_race *skel, int idx,
+ __s64 value)
+{
+ return bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.status), &idx,
+ &value, BPF_ANY);
+}
+
+static int task_work_race_wait_ready(struct task_work_race *skel, __u32 seq)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 2000000 / 100; i++) {
+ __s64 value = 0;
+
+ if (!task_work_race_status(skel, RACE_READY_SEQ, &value) &&
+ value == seq)
+ return 0;
+ if (!task_work_race_status(skel, RACE_RESULT, &value) &&
+ (__u32)((__u64)value >> 32) == seq)
+ /*
+ * The BPF program finished between the two reads:
+ * RESULT makes waiting for READY unnecessary. Any error
+ * that occurred before READY is checked by the caller.
+ */
+ return 0;
+ usleep(100);
+ }
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+}
+
+static int task_work_race_prepare_elem(struct task_work_race *skel)
+{
+ struct task_work_race_value value = {};
+ int key = 0;
+
+ if (!bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.hmap), &key, &value))
+ return 0;
+ if (errno != ENOENT)
+ return -errno;
+ if (bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.hmap), &key, &value,
+ BPF_NOEXIST))
+ return -errno;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int task_work_race_arm(struct task_work_race *skel, __u32 seq)
+{
+ if (task_work_race_set_status(skel, RACE_ARM_SEQ, seq))
+ return -errno;
+ return task_work_race_wait_ready(skel, seq);
+}
+
+static int task_work_race_check_done(struct task_work_race *skel, __u32 seq)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 2000000 / 100; i++) {
+ __s64 result = 0;
+
+ if (!task_work_race_status(skel, RACE_RESULT, &result) &&
+ (__u32)((__u64)result >> 32) == seq)
+ return (__s32)result;
+ usleep(100);
+ }
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+}
+
+static int task_work_race_wait_callback(struct task_work_race *skel,
+ __u32 seq)
+{
+ int i, key = seq;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 2000000 / 100; i++) {
+ __u64 completed = 0;
+
+ if (!bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.completed),
+ &key, &completed) && completed)
+ return 0;
+ usleep(100);
+ }
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+}
+
+void serial_test_task_work_race(void)
+{
+ struct task_work_race_ctx ctx = {};
+ struct task_work_race *skel;
+ pthread_t trigger, target;
+ cpu_set_t allowed;
+ int cpu, cpu_count = 0;
+ bool target_started = false, trigger_started = false;
+ int err, i, key = 0;
+
+ if (sched_getaffinity(0, sizeof(allowed), &allowed)) {
+ ASSERT_OK(-errno, "sched_getaffinity");
+ return;
+ }
+ for (cpu = 0; cpu < CPU_SETSIZE && cpu_count < 2; cpu++) {
+ if (!CPU_ISSET(cpu, &allowed))
+ continue;
+ if (!cpu_count)
+ ctx.trigger_cpu = cpu;
+ else
+ ctx.target_cpu = cpu;
+ cpu_count++;
+ }
+ if (cpu_count < 2) {
+ printf("%s:SKIP:need two CPUs in the process affinity mask\n",
+ __func__);
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ skel = task_work_race__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open_and_load"))
+ return;
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(task_work_race__attach(skel), "attach"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ err = pthread_create(&target, NULL, task_work_race_target, &ctx);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "pthread_create target"))
+ goto cleanup;
+ target_started = true;
+ err = pthread_create(&trigger, NULL, task_work_race_trigger, &ctx);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "pthread_create trigger"))
+ goto stop;
+ trigger_started = true;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 5000000 / 100; i++) {
+ if (__atomic_load_n(&ctx.trigger_tid, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE) &&
+ __atomic_load_n(&ctx.target_tid, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE))
+ break;
+ usleep(100);
+ }
+ if (!ASSERT_TRUE(__atomic_load_n(&ctx.trigger_tid, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE) &&
+ __atomic_load_n(&ctx.target_tid, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE),
+ "thread start"))
+ goto stop;
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(__atomic_load_n(&ctx.setup_err, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE),
+ "thread affinity"))
+ goto stop;
+
+ skel->bss->trigger_tid = __atomic_load_n(&ctx.trigger_tid, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
+ skel->bss->target_tid = __atomic_load_n(&ctx.target_tid, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < TASK_WORK_RACE_ROUNDS; i++) {
+ __u32 seq = i + 1;
+ int variant = i % 3;
+
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(task_work_race_prepare_elem(skel), "prepare elem") ||
+ !ASSERT_OK(task_work_race_arm(skel, seq), "round ready"))
+ goto stop;
+
+ if (variant == 2 &&
+ !ASSERT_OK(bpf_map_delete_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.hmap),
+ &key), "early delete"))
+ goto stop;
+
+ err = task_work_race_check_done(skel, seq);
+ /*
+ * Variant 2 deletes the element right after READY, so losing
+ * the race against the scheduling kfunc is a valid outcome:
+ * the schedule itself fails with -EBUSY (ctx already FREED),
+ * and the retry on the next tracepoint invocation fails with
+ * -ENOENT because the element is gone. Either way the round
+ * exercised the deletion paths; a later variant 0 round
+ * recreates the element.
+ */
+ if (variant == 2 && (err == -EBUSY || err == -ENOENT))
+ err = 0;
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "schedule")) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "round %d schedule failed: %d\n", i, err);
+ goto stop;
+ }
+
+ if (variant != 2 &&
+ !ASSERT_OK(task_work_race_wait_callback(skel, seq),
+ "callback"))
+ goto stop;
+
+ if (variant == 1 &&
+ !ASSERT_OK(bpf_map_delete_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.hmap),
+ &key), "late delete"))
+ goto stop;
+ }
+
+ /* A distinct completion generation prevents an old callback satisfying this. */
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(task_work_race_prepare_elem(skel), "final prepare") ||
+ !ASSERT_OK(task_work_race_arm(skel, TASK_WORK_RACE_ROUNDS + 1),
+ "final ready") ||
+ !ASSERT_OK(task_work_race_check_done(skel,
+ TASK_WORK_RACE_ROUNDS + 1),
+ "final schedule") ||
+ !ASSERT_OK(task_work_race_wait_callback(skel,
+ TASK_WORK_RACE_ROUNDS + 1),
+ "final callback"))
+ goto stop;
+
+stop:
+ __atomic_store_n(&ctx.stop, 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
+ if (trigger_started)
+ pthread_join(trigger, NULL);
+ if (target_started)
+ pthread_join(target, NULL);
+cleanup:
+ task_work_race__destroy(skel);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_work_race.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_work_race.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c94eca510cb3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_work_race.c
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2026 KylinSoft Corporation. */
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+#define TASK_WORK_RACE_MAX_SEQ 2048
+
+enum task_work_race_status {
+ RACE_ARM_SEQ,
+ RACE_READY_SEQ,
+ /* High 32 bits hold the sequence, low 32 bits the signed error. */
+ RACE_RESULT,
+ RACE_STATUS_MAX,
+};
+
+int trigger_tid;
+int target_tid;
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+ __uint(max_entries, RACE_STATUS_MAX);
+ __type(key, int);
+ __type(value, __s64);
+} status SEC(".maps");
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+ __uint(max_entries, TASK_WORK_RACE_MAX_SEQ);
+ __type(key, int);
+ __type(value, __u64);
+} completed SEC(".maps");
+
+struct task_work_race_value {
+ __u32 seq;
+ char data[60];
+ struct bpf_task_work tw;
+};
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+ __uint(map_flags, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
+ __uint(max_entries, 4);
+ __type(key, int);
+ __type(value, struct task_work_race_value);
+} hmap SEC(".maps");
+
+static __always_inline void set_status(int key, __s64 value)
+{
+ __s64 *slot;
+
+ slot = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&status, &key);
+ if (slot)
+ *slot = value;
+}
+
+static int process_work(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value)
+{
+ struct task_work_race_value *work = value;
+ __u64 *done;
+ int seq = work->seq;
+
+ if (seq <= 0 || seq >= TASK_WORK_RACE_MAX_SEQ)
+ return 0;
+ done = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&completed, &seq);
+ if (done)
+ *done = 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("tracepoint/syscalls/sys_enter_getppid")
+int race_sched_work(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct task_work_race_value *work;
+ struct task_struct *task;
+ __s64 *arm, *result;
+ __u32 tid = (__u32)bpf_get_current_pid_tgid();
+ int key = 0, err;
+ __u32 seq;
+
+ if (tid != trigger_tid)
+ return 0;
+
+ key = RACE_ARM_SEQ;
+ arm = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&status, &key);
+ key = RACE_RESULT;
+ result = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&status, &key);
+ if (!arm || !result || *arm <= 0 ||
+ (__u32)((__u64)*result >> 32) == *arm)
+ return 0;
+ seq = *arm;
+
+ task = bpf_task_from_pid(target_tid);
+ if (!task) {
+ err = -ESRCH;
+ goto out_done;
+ }
+
+ key = 0;
+ work = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&hmap, &key);
+ if (!work) {
+ err = -ENOENT;
+ goto out_task;
+ }
+
+ work->seq = seq;
+ set_status(RACE_READY_SEQ, seq);
+ err = bpf_task_work_schedule_signal(task, &work->tw, &hmap,
+ process_work);
+ if (err == -EBUSY) {
+ bpf_task_release(task);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+out_task:
+ bpf_task_release(task);
+out_done:
+ /* Publish the sequence and its error in one store. */
+ *result = ((__u64)seq << 32) | (__u32)err;
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] bpf: Fix task work scheduling and callback race
2026-09-22 10:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] bpf: Fix task work scheduling and callback race Yun Lu
@ 2026-09-23 17:46 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-09-23 23:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mykyta Yatsenko @ 2026-09-23 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yun Lu, ast, daniel, andrii, eddyz87, memxor, martin.lau, song,
yonghong.song, jolsa, emil, ihor.solodrai
Cc: yatsenko, bpf
On 9/22/26 11:00 AM, Yun Lu wrote:
> From: Yun Lu <luyun@kylinos.cn>
>
> bpf_task_work_irq() publishes a task_work callback before changing the
> context from SCHEDULING to SCHEDULED. The callback can therefore run on
> another CPU while the irq_work handler is still using the same scheduling
> round.
>
> Nothing currently orders the handler's use of ctx->task against
> bpf_task_work_ctx_reset(). The callback can reset ctx->task and publish
> STANDBY before the handler resumes, allowing map-value deletion to make the
> handler pass NULL to task_work_cancel(). Publishing STANDBY this early
> also allows a new round to reuse the context and irq_work while the old
> handler is still running.
>
> One concrete interleaving is:
>
> 1. CPU 0 changes PENDING to SCHEDULING in bpf_task_work_irq() and
> successfully publishes ctx->work with task_work_add(), but has not yet
> attempted the SCHEDULING-to-SCHEDULED transition.
>
> 2. The target task on CPU 1 runs the callback. It changes SCHEDULING to
> RUNNING, executes the BPF subprogram, then bpf_task_work_ctx_reset()
> releases ctx->task and sets it to NULL. The callback changes RUNNING
> to STANDBY and drops its ctx reference.
>
> 3. CPU 2 deletes the map value. bpf_task_work_cancel_and_free() changes
> STANDBY to FREED. Since the old state is not SCHEDULED, it does not
> queue cancellation and drops the map's ctx reference.
>
> 4. CPU 0 resumes. Its SCHEDULING-to-SCHEDULED cmpxchg observes FREED, so
> bpf_task_work_cancel() calls task_work_cancel(NULL, &ctx->work).
>
> If deletion changes the state to FREED before the callback runs, the
> callback instead takes its FREED exit and may drop the last ctx reference.
> The destroy path then resets ctx->task, producing the same NULL dereference
> when CPU 0 resumes.
>
> A controlled reproducer that delays CPU 0 between task_work_add() and the
> state cmpxchg triggered the following fault on a v7.3-rc3 based x86-64 KVM
> guest:
>
> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000890
> #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> RIP: task_work_cancel+0xd/0xa0
> RDI: 0000000000000000
> CR2: 0000000000000890
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ>
> bpf_task_work_irq+0x95/0x100
> irq_work_run_list+0x4f/0x90
> irq_work_run+0x18/0x50
> __sysvec_irq_work+0x18/0xb0
> sysvec_irq_work+0x66/0x80
> </IRQ>
>
> 0x890 is the task_struct::task_works offset in that build. It is read by
> task_work_pending() through the NULL task argument. The rcu_read_lock() in
> bpf_task_work_irq() only keeps ctx memory alive; it does not retain
> ctx->task. A NULL check would still race with releasing the task
> reference.
>
> Fix this by taking a task reference in the scheduling irq_work before
> publishing the callback. Use the captured task for cancellation at the
> handler tail, so the task remains valid even if the callback or destroy
> path has reset ctx->task. Release the reference on every add success and
> failure path.
>
> The asynchronous cancellation path is queued only after deletion wins
> SCHEDULED-to-FREED. In that case the callback observes FREED and cannot
> reset ctx->task, while the map's transferred ctx reference prevents the
> destroy path from doing so. It can therefore safely pass ctx->task to the
> same cancellation helper. The two cancellation paths are mutually
> exclusive: the scheduling handler handles deletion from SCHEDULING, and
> the asynchronous path handles deletion from SCHEDULED.
>
> The callback or add-failure path can publish STANDBY before the scheduling
> irq_work returns. Initialize irq_work when the context is created and
> reject a new round while it is still BUSY. This prevents the old handler
> from consuming the new round's SCHEDULING state and publishing a false
> SCHEDULED state, and prevents invocations on different CPUs from
> overlapping on the same context.
>
> This keeps the task-work callback non-blocking and adds no context fields
> or states.
>
> Fixes: 38aa7003e369 ("bpf: task work scheduling kfuncs")
> Reported-by: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn>
> Suggested-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yun Lu <luyun@kylinos.cn>
> ---
Looks good, the only thing that bothers a bit is
PENDING -> STANDBY transition when irq_work_is_busy(),
but overall looks like the cleanest solution.
Acked-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
> kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> index b3cc5c8fc875..d8bea7538de5 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> @@ -4437,7 +4437,8 @@ static void bpf_task_work_ctx_put(struct bpf_task_work_ctx *ctx)
> }
> }
>
> -static void bpf_task_work_cancel(struct bpf_task_work_ctx *ctx)
> +static void bpf_task_work_cancel(struct bpf_task_work_ctx *ctx,
> + struct task_struct *task)
> {
> /*
> * Scheduled task_work callback holds ctx ref, so if we successfully
> @@ -4445,7 +4446,7 @@ static void bpf_task_work_cancel(struct bpf_task_work_ctx *ctx)
> * cancel, callback will inevitably run or has already completed
> * running, and it would have taken care of its ctx ref itself.
> */
> - if (task_work_cancel(ctx->task, &ctx->work))
> + if (task_work_cancel(task, &ctx->work))
> bpf_task_work_ctx_put(ctx);
> }
>
> @@ -4486,6 +4487,7 @@ static void bpf_task_work_callback(struct callback_head *cb)
> static void bpf_task_work_irq(struct irq_work *irq_work)
> {
> struct bpf_task_work_ctx *ctx = container_of(irq_work, struct bpf_task_work_ctx, irq_work);
> + struct task_struct *task;
> enum bpf_task_work_state state;
> int err;
>
> @@ -4496,7 +4498,8 @@ static void bpf_task_work_irq(struct irq_work *irq_work)
> return;
> }
>
> - err = task_work_add(ctx->task, &ctx->work, ctx->mode);
> + task = get_task_struct(ctx->task);
> + err = task_work_add(task, &ctx->work, ctx->mode);
> if (err) {
> bpf_task_work_ctx_reset(ctx);
> /*
> @@ -4505,19 +4508,20 @@ static void bpf_task_work_irq(struct irq_work *irq_work)
> */
> (void)cmpxchg(&ctx->state, BPF_TW_SCHEDULING, BPF_TW_STANDBY);
> bpf_task_work_ctx_put(ctx);
> + put_task_struct(task);
> return;
> }
>
> /*
> - * It's technically possible for just scheduled task_work callback to
> - * complete running by now, going SCHEDULING -> RUNNING and then
> - * dropping its ctx refcount. Instead of capturing an extra ref just
> - * to protect below ctx->state access, we rely on rcu_read_lock
> - * above to prevent kfree_rcu from freeing ctx before we return.
> + * The callback may have completed and reset ctx->task already. Keep the
> + * captured task alive until this invocation is done with cancellation.
> + * The RCU read-side section keeps ctx memory alive until then.
> */
> state = cmpxchg(&ctx->state, BPF_TW_SCHEDULING, BPF_TW_SCHEDULED);
> if (state == BPF_TW_FREED)
> - bpf_task_work_cancel(ctx); /* clean up if we switched into FREED state */
> + bpf_task_work_cancel(ctx, task); /* clean up if we switched into FREED state */
> +
> + put_task_struct(task);
> }
>
> static struct bpf_task_work_ctx *bpf_task_work_fetch_ctx(struct bpf_task_work *tw,
> @@ -4537,6 +4541,7 @@ static struct bpf_task_work_ctx *bpf_task_work_fetch_ctx(struct bpf_task_work *t
> memset(ctx, 0, sizeof(*ctx));
> refcount_set(&ctx->refcnt, 1); /* map's own ref */
> ctx->state = BPF_TW_STANDBY;
> + init_irq_work(&ctx->irq_work, bpf_task_work_irq);
>
> old_ctx = cmpxchg(&twk->ctx, NULL, ctx);
> if (old_ctx) {
> @@ -4579,6 +4584,18 @@ static struct bpf_task_work_ctx *bpf_task_work_acquire_ctx(struct bpf_task_work
> bpf_task_work_ctx_put(ctx);
> return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
> }
> + /*
> + * The callback or add-failure path can publish STANDBY before the
> + * scheduling irq_work returns. Do not let a new round reuse the context
> + * until BUSY clears. Otherwise the old handler can consume the new
> + * round's SCHEDULING state and publish a false SCHEDULED state, and two
> + * invocations can overlap on different CPUs.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(irq_work_is_busy(&ctx->irq_work))) {
> + (void)cmpxchg(&ctx->state, BPF_TW_PENDING, BPF_TW_STANDBY);
> + bpf_task_work_ctx_put(ctx);
> + return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
> + }
>
> /*
> * If no process or bpffs is holding a reference to the map, no new callbacks should be
> @@ -4628,7 +4645,6 @@ static int bpf_task_work_schedule(struct task_struct *task, struct bpf_task_work
> ctx->map = map;
> ctx->map_val = (void *)tw - map->record->task_work_off;
> init_task_work(&ctx->work, bpf_task_work_callback);
> - init_irq_work(&ctx->irq_work, bpf_task_work_irq);
>
> irq_work_queue(&ctx->irq_work);
> return 0;
> @@ -4777,7 +4793,8 @@ static void bpf_task_work_cancel_scheduled(struct irq_work *irq_work)
> {
> struct bpf_task_work_ctx *ctx = container_of(irq_work, struct bpf_task_work_ctx, irq_work);
>
> - bpf_task_work_cancel(ctx); /* this might put task_work callback's ref */
> + /* SCHEDULED -> FREED keeps ctx->task stable until this runs. */
> + bpf_task_work_cancel(ctx, ctx->task); /* this might put task_work callback's ref */
> bpf_task_work_ctx_put(ctx); /* and here we put map's own ref that was transferred to us */
> }
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] bpf: Fix task work scheduling and callback race
2026-09-22 10:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] bpf: Fix task work scheduling and callback race Yun Lu
2026-09-23 17:46 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
@ 2026-09-23 23:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-24 9:55 ` luyun
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alexei Starovoitov @ 2026-09-23 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yun Lu, daniel, andrii, eddyz87, memxor, martin.lau, song,
yonghong.song, jolsa, emil, ihor.solodrai
Cc: yatsenko, bpf
On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 06:00 PM Yun Lu <luyun_611@163.com> wrote:
> - err = task_work_add(ctx->task, &ctx->work, ctx->mode);
> + task = get_task_struct(ctx->task);
> + err = task_work_add(task, &ctx->work, ctx->mode);
Why?
There should be no need for get_task_struct().
rcu_read_lock() keeps task_struct around.
bpf_task_release() is put_task_struct_rcu_user(), so the task is
freed after rcu gp and guard(rcu)() covers the whole handler.
task = ctx->task;
is enough.
The commit log still says that rcu_read_lock() "does not retain
ctx->task". why?
[...]
> + if (unlikely(irq_work_is_busy(&ctx->irq_work))) {
> + (void)cmpxchg(&ctx->state, BPF_TW_PENDING, BPF_TW_STANDBY);
> + bpf_task_work_ctx_put(ctx);
> + return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
> + }
This is a fix for a different bug.
Pls split it into a separate patch and describe the sequence in
its commit log the way it's done for the first one.
"publishing a false SCHEDULED state" doesn't say what breaks.
pw-bot: cr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] bpf: Fix task work scheduling and callback race
2026-09-23 23:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
@ 2026-09-24 9:55 ` luyun
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: luyun @ 2026-09-24 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexei Starovoitov, daniel, andrii, eddyz87, memxor, martin.lau,
song, yonghong.song, jolsa, emil, ihor.solodrai
Cc: yatsenko, bpf
在 2026/9/24 07:04, Alexei Starovoitov 写道:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 06:00 PM Yun Lu <luyun_611@163.com> wrote:
>> - err = task_work_add(ctx->task, &ctx->work, ctx->mode);
>> + task = get_task_struct(ctx->task);
>> + err = task_work_add(task, &ctx->work, ctx->mode);
> Why?
> There should be no need for get_task_struct().
> rcu_read_lock() keeps task_struct around.
> bpf_task_release() is put_task_struct_rcu_user(), so the task is
> freed after rcu gp and guard(rcu)() covers the whole handler.
> task = ctx->task;
> is enough.
> The commit log still says that rcu_read_lock() "does not retain
> ctx->task". why?
Hi, Alexei
Thanks for your reviewing.
You are right.
I added get_task_struct() to keep the task valid for the handler's post-add
cancellation, but overlooked that guard(rcu)() already covers the handler
and bpf_task_release() defers freeing the task past the RCU grace period.
v4 will drop the get/put_task_struct and captures the pointer, also
correct the commit log.
>
> [...]
>
>> + if (unlikely(irq_work_is_busy(&ctx->irq_work))) {
>> + (void)cmpxchg(&ctx->state, BPF_TW_PENDING, BPF_TW_STANDBY);
>> + bpf_task_work_ctx_put(ctx);
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
>> + }
> This is a fix for a different bug.
> Pls split it into a separate patch and describe the sequence in
> its commit log the way it's done for the first one.
> "publishing a false SCHEDULED state" doesn't say what breaks.
OK, v4 will split the irq_work_is_busy() check into a separate patch,
and describe the interleaving and the concrete failure in commit log.
---
Thanks.
Yun Lu
>
> pw-bot: cr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-24 9:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-22 10:00 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/2] bpf: Fix task work scheduling race Yun Lu
2026-09-22 10:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] bpf: Fix task work scheduling and callback race Yun Lu
2026-09-23 17:46 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-09-23 23:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-24 9:55 ` luyun
2026-09-22 10:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add task work scheduling race test Yun Lu
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.