From: "Eliot Courtney" <ecourtney@nvidia.com>
To: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>, "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>
Cc: "Alistair Popple" <apopple@nvidia.com>,
"Timur Tabi" <ttabi@nvidia.com>,
"Eliot Courtney" <ecourtney@nvidia.com>,
"Zhi Wang" <zhiw@nvidia.com>, <nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel" <dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: split the transport part of the receive path
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 10:56:34 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMA55SJ39DQU.2NWD9I1FRH4Z8@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261020-cmdq-rpc-v5-9-dceeb8f360ec@nvidia.com>
On Tue Oct 20, 2026 at 7:08 PM JST, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> `receive_msg` currently handles both the transport and RPC layers.
> Retire it and split its logic between the new `consume_element`, a
> transport-level method which passes the parsed message contents to a
> closure before advancing the CPU read pointer past it, and the
> already-existing `await_msg`, which calls `consume_element` with a
> closure matching the RPC message.
>
> This introduces a small behavioral change: a matched RPC message that is
> too short to contain the message component itself no longer stalls the
> queue. This behavior is justified because it fixes an inconsistency:
> unmatched RPC messages were always skipped, whereas matched RPC messages
> could block the queue if they were too short. While a misconstructed RPC
> message is a problem, it is not a fatal queue error as long as the
> transport framing and checksum are valid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
> ---
[...]
> - /// Receive a message from the GSP.
> + /// Wait for the next element on the message queue, pass it to `f`, advance the read pointer
> + /// past the message, and returns the result of `f`.
> ///
> - /// A message whose function code is `M::FUNCTION` is decoded and returned. Any other message
> - /// is logged as an event.
> - ///
> - /// The read pointer is always advanced past the message, regardless of whether it matched.
> + /// The read pointer advances regardless of whether `f` succeeds or not.
> ///
> /// # Errors
> ///
> /// - `ETIMEDOUT` if `timeout` has elapsed before any message becomes available.
> - /// - `EIO` if a message fails framing or checksum validation.
> - /// - `ENOMSG` if the message was not the awaited reply.
> + /// - `EIO` if a message fails framing or checksum validation. In this case, the read pointer
> + /// does not advance and the queue is stalled. This is a fatal error.
> ///
> - /// Error codes returned by [`MessageFromGsp::read`] are propagated as-is.
> - fn receive_msg<M: MessageFromGsp>(&mut self, timeout: Delta) -> Result<M>
> - where
> - // This allows all error types, including `Infallible`, to be used for `M::InitError`.
> - Error: From<M::InitError>,
> - {
> + /// If an error is returned, then `f` has not been called.
optional nit: Clarify in a comment that w.r.t. `EIO` and `f` not being
called, that only applies for the outermost Err. i.e., we do have
R = Result<>, so we have Result<Result<>> but we're only talking about
the outer (transport) Result here. Maybe one way to clarify this is
that `R` contains the output of the message layer and may itself
be a Result<>, and this function returns a Result for the transport
layer. Not sure of the best way to phrase it but you know what I mean.
Reviewed-by: Eliot Courtney <ecourtney@nvidia.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-21 1:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-20 10:08 [PATCH v5 00/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: prepare the command queue for r000 dual-message types Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: remove stale comment Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 11:43 ` Eliot Courtney
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: simplify framing error description Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 11:43 ` Eliot Courtney
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: validate checksum earlier on receive Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: introduce and use proper RpcMessageHeader type Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: group the RPC-specific part of send_single_command Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: split the transport part of the send path Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: split RPC parsing part of the receive path Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: move RPC message logging to RpcMessage Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: split the transport part of the receive path Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-21 1:56 ` Eliot Courtney [this message]
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: extract await_msg_with from await_msg Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-21 2:00 ` Eliot Courtney
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: use consume_element to implement drain Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 14:27 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-21 2:57 ` Eliot Courtney
2026-10-21 3:12 ` John Hubbard
2026-10-21 3:23 ` Eliot Courtney
2026-10-21 4:05 ` John Hubbard
2026-10-21 2:58 ` Eliot Courtney
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: move the RPC code into a sub-module Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: move the RPC commands " Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: add `rpc` to RPC message send/receive methods Alexandre Courbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DMA55SJ39DQU.2NWD9I1FRH4Z8@nvidia.com \
--to=ecourtney@nvidia.com \
--cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=ttabi@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.