* [PATCH] libbpf: fix symbol resolution without .symtab
@ 2026-10-23 14:10 Eduard Zateev
2026-10-23 14:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23 15:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eduard Zateev @ 2026-10-23 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: ast, daniel, andrii, eddyz87, memxor, martin.lau, song,
yonghong.song, jolsa, emil, ihor.solodrai, shuah, linux-kselftest,
Eduard Zateev
When a binary has .dynsym but no .symtab, elf_sym_iter_new() returns -ENOENT for the optional table. Keep checking the other table and clear that error; otherwise successful dynamic-symbol lookups are reported as failures.
Add a regression selftest for a stripped shared object and verify that unresolved symbols still fail.
Link: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/953
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zateev <hackerowskiy@gmail.com>
---
tools/lib/bpf/elf.c | 5 ++-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 7 +++-
.../bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/uprobe_multi_stripped.c | 7 ++++
4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/uprobe_multi_stripped.c
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/elf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/elf.c
index 700c3911a..76baaf778 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/elf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/elf.c
@@ -438,8 +438,11 @@ int elf_resolve_syms_offsets(const char *binary_path, int cnt,
struct elf_sym *sym;
err = elf_sym_iter_new(&iter, elf_fd.elf, binary_path, sh_types[i], st_type);
- if (err == -ENOENT)
+ if (err == -ENOENT) {
+ /* A missing symbol table is OK; check the other one. */
+ err = 0;
continue;
+ }
if (err)
goto out;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index 1e4af62e8..4125133d4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@ -61,7 +61,8 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED = \
xdp_synproxy \
xskxceiver
-TEST_GEN_FILES += $(TEST_KMODS) liburandom_read.so urandom_read sign-file uprobe_multi
+TEST_GEN_FILES += $(TEST_KMODS) liburandom_read.so urandom_read sign-file uprobe_multi \
+ uprobe_multi_stripped.so
ifneq ($(V),1)
submake_extras := feature_display=0
@@ -666,6 +667,10 @@ $(OUTPUT)/uprobe_multi: uprobe_multi.c uprobe_multi.ld
$(Q)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -Wl,-T,uprobe_multi.ld -O0 $(LDFLAGS) \
$(filter-out %.ld,$^) $(LDLIBS) -o $@
+$(OUTPUT)/uprobe_multi_stripped.so: uprobe_multi_stripped.c
+ $(call msg,BINARY,,$@)
+ $(Q)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -fPIC -shared -Wl,-s $(LDFLAGS) $< -o $@
+
EXTRA_CLEAN := $(SCRATCH_DIR) $(HOST_SCRATCH_DIR) \
prog_tests/tests.h map_tests/tests.h verifier/tests.h \
feature bpftool $(TEST_KMOD_TARGETS) \
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
index f0baf5738..340e3b55c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
@@ -374,6 +374,41 @@ static void test_attach_api_syms(void)
test_attach_api("/proc/self/exe", NULL, &opts);
}
+static void test_attach_api_syms_stripped(void)
+{
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_uprobe_multi_opts, opts);
+ const char *syms[] = { "uprobe_multi_stripped_func" };
+ struct uprobe_multi *skel = NULL;
+ struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
+
+ opts.syms = syms;
+ opts.cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(syms);
+
+ skel = uprobe_multi__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "uprobe_multi__open_and_load"))
+ return;
+
+ link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(skel->progs.uprobe, -1,
+ "./uprobe_multi_stripped.so", NULL, &opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_uprobe_multi_stripped")) {
+ link = NULL;
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+ bpf_link__destroy(link);
+ link = NULL;
+
+ /* A missing symbol must still be reported as an error. */
+ syms[0] = "uprobe_multi_missing_func";
+ link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(skel->progs.uprobe, -1,
+ "./uprobe_multi_stripped.so", NULL, &opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_ERR_PTR(link, "attach_uprobe_multi_missing_symbol"))
+ bpf_link__destroy(link);
+ link = NULL;
+
+cleanup:
+ uprobe_multi__destroy(skel);
+}
+
static void test_attach_api_fails(void)
{
LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_link_create_opts, opts);
@@ -1442,6 +1477,8 @@ void test_uprobe_multi_test(void)
test_attach_api_pattern();
if (test__start_subtest("attach_api_syms"))
test_attach_api_syms();
+ if (test__start_subtest("attach_api_syms_stripped"))
+ test_attach_api_syms_stripped();
if (test__start_subtest("link_api"))
test_link_api();
if (test__start_subtest("link_api_path_fd"))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/uprobe_multi_stripped.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/uprobe_multi_stripped.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9bdf7fb9b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/uprobe_multi_stripped.c
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+__attribute__((noinline, visibility("default")))
+int uprobe_multi_stripped_func(void)
+{
+ return 42;
+}
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] libbpf: fix symbol resolution without .symtab
2026-10-23 14:10 [PATCH] libbpf: fix symbol resolution without .symtab Eduard Zateev
@ 2026-10-23 14:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23 15:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-10-23 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eduard Zateev, bpf
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] selftests/bpf: missing uprobe_multi_stripped.so in RUNNER_EXTRA_FILES
- [Low] selftests/bpf: unfiltered -static flag breaks uprobe_multi_stripped.so build
--
commit 4a70746dbfb8f05e040808945c59a7d7fbba3b95
Author: Eduard Zateev <hackerowskiy@gmail.com>
libbpf: fix symbol resolution without .symtab
This commit updates elf_resolve_syms_offsets() in libbpf to clear -ENOENT
when one of the symbol tables (.symtab or .dynsym) is absent so symbol
resolution succeeds against the remaining table. It also adds a regression
selftest using a stripped shared object uprobe_multi_stripped.so.
Link: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/953
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> index 1e4af62e8312e..4125133d4dab6 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -61,7 +61,8 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED = \
> xdp_synproxy \
> xskxceiver
>
> -TEST_GEN_FILES += $(TEST_KMODS) liburandom_read.so urandom_read sign-file uprobe_multi
> +TEST_GEN_FILES += $(TEST_KMODS) liburandom_read.so urandom_read sign-file uprobe_multi \
> + uprobe_multi_stripped.so
[Severity: Medium]
Should $(OUTPUT)/uprobe_multi_stripped.so also be added to
RUNNER_EXTRA_FILES in tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile?
Currently RUNNER_EXTRA_FILES lists the other runtime fixtures:
RUNNER_EXTRA_FILES := $(OUTPUT)/urandom_read \
$(OUTPUT)/liburandom_read.so \
$(OUTPUT)/xdp_synproxy \
$(OUTPUT)/sign-file \
$(OUTPUT)/uprobe_multi \
Because test_progs depends on $(RUNNER_EXTRA_FILES) (or
$(OUTPUT)/runner-extras) rather than $(TEST_GEN_FILES), running make
test_progs on a clean tree will not build uprobe_multi_stripped.so.
In addition, when flavored test runners (test_progs-no_alu32,
test_progs-cpuv4, test_progs-bpf_gcc) start, main() -> cd_flavor_subdir()
in tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c changes the working directory
into the flavor subdirectory, where only $(RUNNER_EXTRA_FILES) are copied.
When test_attach_api_syms_stripped() in
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c then calls:
link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(skel->progs.uprobe, -1,
"./uprobe_multi_stripped.so", NULL, &opts);
opening ./uprobe_multi_stripped.so fails with -ENOENT.
[ ... ]
> @@ -666,6 +667,10 @@ $(OUTPUT)/uprobe_multi: uprobe_multi.c uprobe_multi.ld
> $(Q)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -Wl,-T,uprobe_multi.ld -O0 $(LDFLAGS) \
> $(filter-out %.ld,$^) $(LDLIBS) -o $@
>
> +$(OUTPUT)/uprobe_multi_stripped.so: uprobe_multi_stripped.c
> + $(call msg,BINARY,,$@)
> + $(Q)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -fPIC -shared -Wl,-s $(LDFLAGS) $< -o $@
[Severity: Low]
Will this target fail to link when building the BPF selftests with -static
in CFLAGS or LDFLAGS, since -static and -shared conflict when selecting
startup objects?
In tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile, the $(OUTPUT)/liburandom_read.so
rule filters out -static:
$(OUTPUT)/liburandom_read.so: urandom_read_lib1.c urandom_read_lib2.c liburandom_read.map
$(call msg,LIB,,$@)
$(Q)$(CLANG) $(CLANG_TARGET_ARCH) \
$(filter-out -static,$(COMMON_CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS)) \
Would it make sense to use $(filter-out -static,$(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS)) for
$(OUTPUT)/uprobe_multi_stripped.so as well?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261023141040.249597-1-hackerowskiy@gmail.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] libbpf: fix symbol resolution without .symtab
2026-10-23 14:10 [PATCH] libbpf: fix symbol resolution without .symtab Eduard Zateev
2026-10-23 14:28 ` sashiko-bot
@ 2026-10-23 15:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexei Starovoitov @ 2026-10-23 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eduard Zateev, bpf
Cc: daniel, andrii, eddyz87, memxor, martin.lau, song, yonghong.song,
jolsa, emil, ihor.solodrai, shuah, linux-kselftest
On Fri, Oct 23, 2026 at 07:10 AM Eduard Zateev <hackerowskiy@gmail.com> wrote:
> -TEST_GEN_FILES += $(TEST_KMODS) liburandom_read.so urandom_read sign-file uprobe_multi
> +TEST_GEN_FILES += $(TEST_KMODS) liburandom_read.so urandom_read sign-file uprobe_multi \
> + uprobe_multi_stripped.so
The test will fail in test_progs-no_alu32 and test_progs-cpuv4.
cd_flavor_subdir() does chdir() into no_alu32/ and cpuv4/ and only
RUNNER_EXTRA_FILES are copied there. uprobe_multi_stripped.so is not
in that list, so elf_open("./uprobe_multi_stripped.so") returns -ENOENT
and the first ASSERT_OK_PTR() fails.
'make test_progs' won't build it either.
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_uprobe_multi_stripped")) {
> + link = NULL;
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> + bpf_link__destroy(link);
> + link = NULL;
All three 'link = NULL' are dead code. Nothing reads it afterwards.
pw-bot: cr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-23 15:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-23 14:10 [PATCH] libbpf: fix symbol resolution without .symtab Eduard Zateev
2026-10-23 14:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23 15:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.