From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
To: Cort Dougan <cort@fsmlabs.com>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
Cc: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux, the microkernel (was Re: latest linus-2.5 BK broken)
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 22:25:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E17LUyA-0001wU-00@starship> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020621124634.H13628@host110.fsmlabs.com>
On Friday 21 June 2002 20:46, Cort Dougan wrote:
> I don't see Linux being in serious jeopardy in the short-term of becoming
> solaris. It only aims at running on 1-4 processors and does a pretty good
> job of that. Most sane people realize, as Larry points out, that the
> current design will not scale to 64 processors and beyond. That's obvious,
> it's not an alarmist or deep statement. The key is to realize that it's
> not _meant_ to scale that high right now.
And originally, it was never meant to scale to more than one processor.
--
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-21 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-18 17:18 latest linus-2.5 BK broken James Simmons
2002-06-18 17:46 ` Robert Love
2002-06-18 18:51 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-18 18:43 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-06-18 18:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-18 18:59 ` Robert Love
2002-06-18 20:05 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-18 20:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-18 20:31 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-18 20:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-18 21:12 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-18 21:08 ` Cort Dougan
2002-06-18 21:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-19 12:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-19 17:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 3:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-20 5:24 ` Larry McVoy
2002-06-20 7:26 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-06-20 14:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-20 15:41 ` McVoy's Clusters (was Re: latest linus-2.5 BK broken) Sandy Harris
2002-06-20 17:10 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-20 20:42 ` Timothy D. Witham
2002-06-21 5:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-22 14:14 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-06-20 16:30 ` latest linus-2.5 BK broken Cort Dougan
2002-06-20 17:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-21 6:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-21 17:50 ` Larry McVoy
2002-06-21 17:55 ` Robert Love
2002-06-21 18:09 ` Linux, the microkernel (was Re: latest linus-2.5 BK broken) Jeff Garzik
2002-06-21 18:46 ` Cort Dougan
2002-06-21 20:25 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2002-06-22 1:07 ` Horst von Brand
2002-06-22 1:23 ` Larry McVoy
2002-06-22 12:41 ` Roman Zippel
2002-06-23 15:15 ` Sandy Harris
2002-06-23 17:29 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2002-06-24 6:27 ` Craig I. Hagan
2002-06-24 13:06 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-06-24 10:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-21 19:34 ` Rob Landley
2002-06-22 15:31 ` Alan Cox
2002-06-22 12:24 ` Rob Landley
2002-06-22 19:00 ` Ruth Ivimey-Cook
2002-06-22 21:09 ` jdow
2002-06-23 17:56 ` John Alvord
2002-06-23 20:48 ` jdow
2002-06-23 21:40 ` [OT] " Xavier Bestel
2002-06-22 18:25 ` latest linus-2.5 BK broken Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-22 19:26 ` Larry McVoy
2002-06-22 22:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-22 23:10 ` Larry McVoy
2002-06-23 6:34 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-23 22:56 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-06-20 17:16 ` RW Hawkins
2002-06-20 17:23 ` Cort Dougan
2002-06-20 20:40 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-20 20:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 21:27 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-20 21:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 21:59 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-20 22:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 22:41 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-21 0:09 ` Allen Campbell
2002-06-21 7:43 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-06-21 21:02 ` Rob Landley
2002-06-22 3:57 ` (RFC)i386 arch autodetect( was Re: latest linus-2.5 BK broken ) Matthew D. Pitts
2002-06-22 4:54 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-21 16:01 ` Re: latest linus-2.5 BK broken Sandy Harris
2002-06-21 20:38 ` Rob Landley
2002-06-20 21:13 ` Timothy D. Witham
2002-06-21 19:53 ` Rob Landley
2002-06-21 5:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-19 10:21 ` Padraig Brady
2002-06-18 21:45 ` Bill Huey
2002-06-18 20:55 ` Robert Love
2002-06-19 13:31 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-18 19:29 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-18 19:19 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-06-18 19:49 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-18 19:27 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-06-18 20:13 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-18 20:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-18 22:03 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E17LUyA-0001wU-00@starship \
--to=phillips@arcor.de \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=cort@fsmlabs.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm@bitmover.com \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.