Re: Typo in arch/mips/dec/wbflush.c

[Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>]

In message <20020624215505.GA7864@galileo> you write:
> --- linux.orig-2.4.19-rc1/arch/mips/dec/wbflush.c	Fri Oct  5 13:06:51 200
1
> +++ linux/arch/mips/dec/wbflush.c	Mon Jun 24 15:49:53 2002
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * The DS500/2x0 doesnt need to write back the WB.
> + * The DS500/2x0 doesn't need to write back the WB.
>   */
>  static void wbflush_kn03(void)
>  {

Hmm...

	I've only applied the one that was an actually a definite
spellfix.  While I prefer to use apostrophes, it's a common
abbreviation to skip it: 1/10 according to google.  Compare with
another common misspelling (recieve) which is 1/50.

Given there is a non-zero cost (patch conflict with developers) even
with trivial patches, I've decided not to apply your 41
"doesnt"->"doesn't" patches, unless someone convinces me otherwise.

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.