From: "Bob Copeland" <me@bobcopeland.com>
To: "Nick Kossifidis" <mickflemm@gmail.com>,
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linville@tuxdriver.com, bruno@thinktube.com, jirislaby@gmail.com,
mcgrof@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH 6/8] ath5k: Fixes for PCI-E cards
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:43:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1JTfTv-0002bm-Qp@hash.localnet> (raw)
> > Hey, that's a good clue... I just switched over to b-only and it seems to
> > be much more stable.
...or not. I still got some calibration errors last night in b-mode. Just
so we're on the same page, I see things in the dmesg like:
ath0: failed to restore operational channel after scan
ath5k phy0: calibration timeout (2412 MHz)
ath5k phy0: ath5k_chan_set: unable to reset channel (2412 Mhz)
ath0: failed to set freq to 2412 MHz for scan
ath5k phy0: calibration timeout (2417 MHz)
> If i'm correct you should get 4-7Mbit/sec @ 11Mbit. Plz let me know if
> you have some results, meanwhile i'll try to figure out the i/q
> calibration algo (we are ok for noise floor calibration i believe).
One thing I noticed from my traces is that the binary driver sets
bits AR5K_PHY_AGCCTL_NF | AR5K_PHY_AGCCTL_CAL in AR5K_PHY_AGCCTL.
Then it makes a whole lot of misc register writes, then re-reads
AR5K_PHY_AGCCTL; in that time only the noise floor bit got cleared
but _CAL is still high. Dunno if that means anything to you or not.
e.g:
R: 0x9860 = 0x00009d18 - AR5K_PHY_AGCCTL
W: 0x9860 = 0x00009d1b - AR5K_PHY_AGCCTL <-- set (_CAL | _NF)
W: 0x1000 = 0x00000001 - AR5K_DCU_QCUMASK_BASE
W: 0x1004 = 0x00000002 - unknown
W: 0x1008 = 0x00000004 - unknown
[... lots more writes to DCU & IMR regs ...]
W: 0x00a0 = 0x00080965 - AR5K_PIMR
R: 0x00ac = 0x00000000 - AR5K_SIMR2
W: 0x00ac = 0x00070000 - AR5K_SIMR2
R: 0x9860 = 0x00009d1b - AR5K_PHY_AGCCTL
R: 0x9860 = 0x00009d1b - AR5K_PHY_AGCCTL
R: 0x9860 = 0x00009d1b - AR5K_PHY_AGCCTL
R: 0x9860 = 0x00009d1b - AR5K_PHY_AGCCTL
R: 0x9860 = 0x00009d1b - AR5K_PHY_AGCCTL
R: 0x9860 = 0x00009d1a - AR5K_PHY_AGCCTL <-- _NF cleared
Maybe a red herring as obviously the current method of doing things
works for me sometimes...
--
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
next reply other threads:[~2008-02-25 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-25 15:43 Bob Copeland [this message]
2008-02-26 2:13 ` [ath5k-devel] [PATCH 6/8] ath5k: Fixes for PCI-E cards bruno randolf
2008-02-26 3:51 ` Bob Copeland
2008-02-26 3:57 ` Nick Kossifidis
2008-02-26 4:39 ` Bob Copeland
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-02-24 4:28 Nick Kossifidis
2008-02-24 4:45 ` [ath5k-devel] " Nick Kossifidis
2008-02-24 4:47 ` Nick Kossifidis
2008-02-24 16:09 ` Bob Copeland
2008-02-24 17:59 ` Bob Copeland
2008-02-24 18:58 ` Nick Kossifidis
2008-02-24 20:21 ` Bob Copeland
2008-02-24 23:23 ` Nick Kossifidis
2008-02-27 3:23 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-27 5:54 ` Nick Kossifidis
2008-02-27 13:30 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-27 15:52 ` John W. Linville
2008-02-27 18:44 ` Nick Kossifidis
2008-02-28 22:20 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-24 23:48 ` Nick Kossifidis
2008-02-25 2:23 ` Bob Copeland
2008-02-25 14:20 ` Nick Kossifidis
2008-02-24 20:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-02-24 23:27 ` Nick Kossifidis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1JTfTv-0002bm-Qp@hash.localnet \
--to=me@bobcopeland.com \
--cc=ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org \
--cc=bruno@thinktube.com \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
--cc=mickflemm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.