[PATCH v2 0/7] spi: spi-ep93xx: cleanup and update driver to modern API

[PATCH v2 0/7] spi: spi-ep93xx: cleanup and update driver to modern API

[Chris Packham]

Cleanup and update this driver to use the default master transfer queueing
mechanism provided by the core.

I've been carrying these changes locally to use as a basis for other SPI work.
Mark Brown pointed out that he's simply missed seeing it, Andy Shevchenko had
some minor comment's which I've now addressed. I'm just re-sending this on
Hartley Sweeten's behalf.

H Hartley Sweeten (7):
  spi: spi-ep93xx: remove io wrappers
  spi: spi-ep93xx: use 32-bit read/write for all registers
  spi: spi-ep93xx: add spi master prepare_transfer_hardware()
  spi: spi-ep93xx: absorb the interrupt enable/disable helpers
  spi: spi-ep93xx: pass the spi_master pointer around
  spi: spi-ep93xx: remove private data 'current_msg'
  spi: spi-ep93xx: use the default master transfer queueing mechanism

 drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 501 +++++++++++++++++------------------------------
 1 file changed, 177 insertions(+), 324 deletions(-)

-- 
2.13.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v2 0/7] spi: spi-ep93xx: cleanup and update driver to modern API

[Chris Packham]

Cleanup and update this driver to use the default master transfer queueing
mechanism provided by the core.

I've been carrying these changes locally to use as a basis for other SPI work.
Mark Brown pointed out that he's simply missed seeing it, Andy Shevchenko had
some minor comment's which I've now addressed. I'm just re-sending this on
Hartley Sweeten's behalf.

H Hartley Sweeten (7):
  spi: spi-ep93xx: remove io wrappers
  spi: spi-ep93xx: use 32-bit read/write for all registers
  spi: spi-ep93xx: add spi master prepare_transfer_hardware()
  spi: spi-ep93xx: absorb the interrupt enable/disable helpers
  spi: spi-ep93xx: pass the spi_master pointer around
  spi: spi-ep93xx: remove private data 'current_msg'
  spi: spi-ep93xx: use the default master transfer queueing mechanism

 drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 501 +++++++++++++++++------------------------------
 1 file changed, 177 insertions(+), 324 deletions(-)

-- 
2.13.0

[PATCH v2 1/7] spi: spi-ep93xx: remove io wrappers

[Chris Packham]

From: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten-3FF4nKcrg1dE2c76skzGb0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>

The io wrappers just add obfuscation to the driver. Remove them.

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten-3FF4nKcrg1dE2c76skzGb0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
index b5d766064b7b..49c42a6c2be1 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
  * struct ep93xx_spi - EP93xx SPI controller structure
  * @pdev: pointer to platform device
  * @clk: clock for the controller
- * @regs_base: pointer to ioremap()'d registers
+ * @mmio: pointer to ioremap()'d registers
  * @sspdr_phys: physical address of the SSPDR register
  * @wait: wait here until given transfer is completed
  * @current_msg: message that is currently processed (or %NULL if none)
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@
 struct ep93xx_spi {
 	const struct platform_device	*pdev;
 	struct clk			*clk;
-	void __iomem			*regs_base;
+	void __iomem			*mmio;
 	unsigned long			sspdr_phys;
 	struct completion		wait;
 	struct spi_message		*current_msg;
@@ -111,28 +111,6 @@ struct ep93xx_spi {
 /* converts bits per word to CR0.DSS value */
 #define bits_per_word_to_dss(bpw)	((bpw) - 1)
 
-static void ep93xx_spi_write_u8(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
-				u16 reg, u8 value)
-{
-	writeb(value, espi->regs_base + reg);
-}
-
-static u8 ep93xx_spi_read_u8(const struct ep93xx_spi *spi, u16 reg)
-{
-	return readb(spi->regs_base + reg);
-}
-
-static void ep93xx_spi_write_u16(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
-				 u16 reg, u16 value)
-{
-	writew(value, espi->regs_base + reg);
-}
-
-static u16 ep93xx_spi_read_u16(const struct ep93xx_spi *spi, u16 reg)
-{
-	return readw(spi->regs_base + reg);
-}
-
 static int ep93xx_spi_enable(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 {
 	u8 regval;
@@ -142,9 +120,9 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_enable(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	regval = ep93xx_spi_read_u8(espi, SSPCR1);
+	regval = readb(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 	regval |= SSPCR1_SSE;
-	ep93xx_spi_write_u8(espi, SSPCR1, regval);
+	writeb(regval, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -153,9 +131,9 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_disable(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 {
 	u8 regval;
 
-	regval = ep93xx_spi_read_u8(espi, SSPCR1);
+	regval = readb(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 	regval &= ~SSPCR1_SSE;
-	ep93xx_spi_write_u8(espi, SSPCR1, regval);
+	writeb(regval, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 
 	clk_disable(espi->clk);
 }
@@ -164,18 +142,18 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_enable_interrupts(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 {
 	u8 regval;
 
-	regval = ep93xx_spi_read_u8(espi, SSPCR1);
+	regval = readb(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 	regval |= (SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
-	ep93xx_spi_write_u8(espi, SSPCR1, regval);
+	writeb(regval, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 }
 
 static void ep93xx_spi_disable_interrupts(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 {
 	u8 regval;
 
-	regval = ep93xx_spi_read_u8(espi, SSPCR1);
+	regval = readb(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 	regval &= ~(SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
-	ep93xx_spi_write_u8(espi, SSPCR1, regval);
+	writeb(regval, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -252,8 +230,8 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 		spi->mode, div_cpsr, div_scr, dss);
 	dev_dbg(&espi->pdev->dev, "setup: cr0 %#x\n", cr0);
 
-	ep93xx_spi_write_u8(espi, SSPCPSR, div_cpsr);
-	ep93xx_spi_write_u16(espi, SSPCR0, cr0);
+	writeb(div_cpsr, espi->mmio + SSPCPSR);
+	writew(cr0, espi->mmio + SSPCR0);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -265,14 +243,14 @@ static void ep93xx_do_write(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)
 
 		if (t->tx_buf)
 			tx_val = ((u16 *)t->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
-		ep93xx_spi_write_u16(espi, SSPDR, tx_val);
+		writew(tx_val, espi->mmio + SSPDR);
 		espi->tx += sizeof(tx_val);
 	} else {
 		u8 tx_val = 0;
 
 		if (t->tx_buf)
 			tx_val = ((u8 *)t->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
-		ep93xx_spi_write_u8(espi, SSPDR, tx_val);
+		writeb(tx_val, espi->mmio + SSPDR);
 		espi->tx += sizeof(tx_val);
 	}
 }
@@ -282,14 +260,14 @@ static void ep93xx_do_read(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)
 	if (t->bits_per_word > 8) {
 		u16 rx_val;
 
-		rx_val = ep93xx_spi_read_u16(espi, SSPDR);
+		rx_val = readw(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
 		if (t->rx_buf)
 			((u16 *)t->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = rx_val;
 		espi->rx += sizeof(rx_val);
 	} else {
 		u8 rx_val;
 
-		rx_val = ep93xx_spi_read_u8(espi, SSPDR);
+		rx_val = readb(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
 		if (t->rx_buf)
 			((u8 *)t->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = rx_val;
 		espi->rx += sizeof(rx_val);
@@ -313,7 +291,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_read_write(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 	struct spi_transfer *t = msg->state;
 
 	/* read as long as RX FIFO has frames in it */
-	while ((ep93xx_spi_read_u8(espi, SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE)) {
+	while ((readb(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE)) {
 		ep93xx_do_read(espi, t);
 		espi->fifo_level--;
 	}
@@ -615,14 +593,14 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 	 * Just to be sure: flush any data from RX FIFO.
 	 */
 	timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(SPI_TIMEOUT);
-	while (ep93xx_spi_read_u16(espi, SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE) {
+	while (readw(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE) {
 		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
 			dev_warn(&espi->pdev->dev,
 				 "timeout while flushing RX FIFO\n");
 			msg->status = -ETIMEDOUT;
 			return;
 		}
-		ep93xx_spi_read_u16(espi, SSPDR);
+		readw(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -671,7 +649,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
 static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = dev_id;
-	u8 irq_status = ep93xx_spi_read_u8(espi, SSPIIR);
+	u8 irq_status = readb(espi->mmio + SSPIIR);
 
 	/*
 	 * If we got ROR (receive overrun) interrupt we know that something is
@@ -679,7 +657,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(irq_status & SSPIIR_RORIS)) {
 		/* clear the overrun interrupt */
-		ep93xx_spi_write_u8(espi, SSPICR, 0);
+		writeb(0, espi->mmio + SSPICR);
 		dev_warn(&espi->pdev->dev,
 			 "receive overrun, aborting the message\n");
 		espi->current_msg->status = -EIO;
@@ -862,9 +840,9 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	espi->sspdr_phys = res->start + SSPDR;
 
-	espi->regs_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
-	if (IS_ERR(espi->regs_base)) {
-		error = PTR_ERR(espi->regs_base);
+	espi->mmio = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
+	if (IS_ERR(espi->mmio)) {
+		error = PTR_ERR(espi->mmio);
 		goto fail_release_master;
 	}
 
@@ -879,7 +857,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "DMA setup failed. Falling back to PIO\n");
 
 	/* make sure that the hardware is disabled */
-	ep93xx_spi_write_u8(espi, SSPCR1, 0);
+	writeb(0, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 
 	error = devm_spi_register_master(&pdev->dev, master);
 	if (error) {
-- 
2.13.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v2 1/7] spi: spi-ep93xx: remove io wrappers

[Chris Packham]

From: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>

The io wrappers just add obfuscation to the driver. Remove them.

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
index b5d766064b7b..49c42a6c2be1 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
  * struct ep93xx_spi - EP93xx SPI controller structure
  * @pdev: pointer to platform device
  * @clk: clock for the controller
- * @regs_base: pointer to ioremap()'d registers
+ * @mmio: pointer to ioremap()'d registers
  * @sspdr_phys: physical address of the SSPDR register
  * @wait: wait here until given transfer is completed
  * @current_msg: message that is currently processed (or %NULL if none)
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@
 struct ep93xx_spi {
 	const struct platform_device	*pdev;
 	struct clk			*clk;
-	void __iomem			*regs_base;
+	void __iomem			*mmio;
 	unsigned long			sspdr_phys;
 	struct completion		wait;
 	struct spi_message		*current_msg;
@@ -111,28 +111,6 @@ struct ep93xx_spi {
 /* converts bits per word to CR0.DSS value */
 #define bits_per_word_to_dss(bpw)	((bpw) - 1)
 
-static void ep93xx_spi_write_u8(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
-				u16 reg, u8 value)
-{
-	writeb(value, espi->regs_base + reg);
-}
-
-static u8 ep93xx_spi_read_u8(const struct ep93xx_spi *spi, u16 reg)
-{
-	return readb(spi->regs_base + reg);
-}
-
-static void ep93xx_spi_write_u16(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
-				 u16 reg, u16 value)
-{
-	writew(value, espi->regs_base + reg);
-}
-
-static u16 ep93xx_spi_read_u16(const struct ep93xx_spi *spi, u16 reg)
-{
-	return readw(spi->regs_base + reg);
-}
-
 static int ep93xx_spi_enable(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 {
 	u8 regval;
@@ -142,9 +120,9 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_enable(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	regval = ep93xx_spi_read_u8(espi, SSPCR1);
+	regval = readb(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 	regval |= SSPCR1_SSE;
-	ep93xx_spi_write_u8(espi, SSPCR1, regval);
+	writeb(regval, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -153,9 +131,9 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_disable(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 {
 	u8 regval;
 
-	regval = ep93xx_spi_read_u8(espi, SSPCR1);
+	regval = readb(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 	regval &= ~SSPCR1_SSE;
-	ep93xx_spi_write_u8(espi, SSPCR1, regval);
+	writeb(regval, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 
 	clk_disable(espi->clk);
 }
@@ -164,18 +142,18 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_enable_interrupts(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 {
 	u8 regval;
 
-	regval = ep93xx_spi_read_u8(espi, SSPCR1);
+	regval = readb(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 	regval |= (SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
-	ep93xx_spi_write_u8(espi, SSPCR1, regval);
+	writeb(regval, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 }
 
 static void ep93xx_spi_disable_interrupts(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 {
 	u8 regval;
 
-	regval = ep93xx_spi_read_u8(espi, SSPCR1);
+	regval = readb(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 	regval &= ~(SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
-	ep93xx_spi_write_u8(espi, SSPCR1, regval);
+	writeb(regval, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -252,8 +230,8 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 		spi->mode, div_cpsr, div_scr, dss);
 	dev_dbg(&espi->pdev->dev, "setup: cr0 %#x\n", cr0);
 
-	ep93xx_spi_write_u8(espi, SSPCPSR, div_cpsr);
-	ep93xx_spi_write_u16(espi, SSPCR0, cr0);
+	writeb(div_cpsr, espi->mmio + SSPCPSR);
+	writew(cr0, espi->mmio + SSPCR0);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -265,14 +243,14 @@ static void ep93xx_do_write(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)
 
 		if (t->tx_buf)
 			tx_val = ((u16 *)t->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
-		ep93xx_spi_write_u16(espi, SSPDR, tx_val);
+		writew(tx_val, espi->mmio + SSPDR);
 		espi->tx += sizeof(tx_val);
 	} else {
 		u8 tx_val = 0;
 
 		if (t->tx_buf)
 			tx_val = ((u8 *)t->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
-		ep93xx_spi_write_u8(espi, SSPDR, tx_val);
+		writeb(tx_val, espi->mmio + SSPDR);
 		espi->tx += sizeof(tx_val);
 	}
 }
@@ -282,14 +260,14 @@ static void ep93xx_do_read(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)
 	if (t->bits_per_word > 8) {
 		u16 rx_val;
 
-		rx_val = ep93xx_spi_read_u16(espi, SSPDR);
+		rx_val = readw(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
 		if (t->rx_buf)
 			((u16 *)t->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = rx_val;
 		espi->rx += sizeof(rx_val);
 	} else {
 		u8 rx_val;
 
-		rx_val = ep93xx_spi_read_u8(espi, SSPDR);
+		rx_val = readb(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
 		if (t->rx_buf)
 			((u8 *)t->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = rx_val;
 		espi->rx += sizeof(rx_val);
@@ -313,7 +291,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_read_write(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 	struct spi_transfer *t = msg->state;
 
 	/* read as long as RX FIFO has frames in it */
-	while ((ep93xx_spi_read_u8(espi, SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE)) {
+	while ((readb(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE)) {
 		ep93xx_do_read(espi, t);
 		espi->fifo_level--;
 	}
@@ -615,14 +593,14 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 	 * Just to be sure: flush any data from RX FIFO.
 	 */
 	timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(SPI_TIMEOUT);
-	while (ep93xx_spi_read_u16(espi, SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE) {
+	while (readw(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE) {
 		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
 			dev_warn(&espi->pdev->dev,
 				 "timeout while flushing RX FIFO\n");
 			msg->status = -ETIMEDOUT;
 			return;
 		}
-		ep93xx_spi_read_u16(espi, SSPDR);
+		readw(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -671,7 +649,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
 static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = dev_id;
-	u8 irq_status = ep93xx_spi_read_u8(espi, SSPIIR);
+	u8 irq_status = readb(espi->mmio + SSPIIR);
 
 	/*
 	 * If we got ROR (receive overrun) interrupt we know that something is
@@ -679,7 +657,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(irq_status & SSPIIR_RORIS)) {
 		/* clear the overrun interrupt */
-		ep93xx_spi_write_u8(espi, SSPICR, 0);
+		writeb(0, espi->mmio + SSPICR);
 		dev_warn(&espi->pdev->dev,
 			 "receive overrun, aborting the message\n");
 		espi->current_msg->status = -EIO;
@@ -862,9 +840,9 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	espi->sspdr_phys = res->start + SSPDR;
 
-	espi->regs_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
-	if (IS_ERR(espi->regs_base)) {
-		error = PTR_ERR(espi->regs_base);
+	espi->mmio = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
+	if (IS_ERR(espi->mmio)) {
+		error = PTR_ERR(espi->mmio);
 		goto fail_release_master;
 	}
 
@@ -879,7 +857,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "DMA setup failed. Falling back to PIO\n");
 
 	/* make sure that the hardware is disabled */
-	ep93xx_spi_write_u8(espi, SSPCR1, 0);
+	writeb(0, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 
 	error = devm_spi_register_master(&pdev->dev, master);
 	if (error) {
-- 
2.13.0

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] spi: spi-ep93xx: remove io wrappers

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 540 bytes --]

On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 12:00:17PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
> From: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten-3FF4nKcrg1dE2c76skzGb0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
> 
> The io wrappers just add obfuscation to the driver. Remove them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten-3FF4nKcrg1dE2c76skzGb0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
> ---

I can't do anything with this patch since you haven't provided a signoff
- this is essential for anything going upstream, please see
SubmittingPatches for detais on what it means and why it's important.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] spi: spi-ep93xx: remove io wrappers

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 480 bytes --]

On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 12:00:17PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
> From: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
> 
> The io wrappers just add obfuscation to the driver. Remove them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
> ---

I can't do anything with this patch since you haven't provided a signoff
- this is essential for anything going upstream, please see
SubmittingPatches for detais on what it means and why it's important.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] spi: spi-ep93xx: remove io wrappers

[Chris Packham]

On 08/08/17 21:42, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 12:00:17PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
>> From: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten-3FF4nKcrg1dE2c76skzGb0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> The io wrappers just add obfuscation to the driver. Remove them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten-3FF4nKcrg1dE2c76skzGb0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
> 
> I can't do anything with this patch since you haven't provided a signoff
> - this is essential for anything going upstream, please see
> SubmittingPatches for detais on what it means and why it's important.
> 

I didn't sign it because it's the patch that came from Hartley verbatim 
(same for 5/7, 6/7 and 7/7). The ones I did sign I'd made changes to. 
Re-reading the DCO point c I understand now that I should have signed 
all of them so I'll submit a v3 series to do so.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] spi: spi-ep93xx: remove io wrappers

[Chris Packham]

On 08/08/17 21:42, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 12:00:17PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
>> From: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
>>
>> The io wrappers just add obfuscation to the driver. Remove them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
>> ---
> 
> I can't do anything with this patch since you haven't provided a signoff
> - this is essential for anything going upstream, please see
> SubmittingPatches for detais on what it means and why it's important.
> 

I didn't sign it because it's the patch that came from Hartley verbatim 
(same for 5/7, 6/7 and 7/7). The ones I did sign I'd made changes to. 
Re-reading the DCO point c I understand now that I should have signed 
all of them so I'll submit a v3 series to do so.

[PATCH v2 2/7] spi: spi-ep93xx: use 32-bit read/write for all registers

[Chris Packham]

From: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten-3FF4nKcrg1dE2c76skzGb0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>

All the EP93xx SSP registers are 32-bit. Since most of the upper bits
are unused, this driver tries to be tricky and uses 8 or 16-bit I/O to
access the registers. This really just adds a bit of confusion.

Simplify the I/O by using 32-bit read/write's for all of the registers.

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten-3FF4nKcrg1dE2c76skzGb0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
[chris: use u32 instead of unsigned int]
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham-6g8wRflRTwXFdCa3tKVlE6U/zSkkHjvu@public.gmane.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
index 49c42a6c2be1..0bd792020471 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
@@ -113,47 +113,47 @@ struct ep93xx_spi {
 
 static int ep93xx_spi_enable(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 {
-	u8 regval;
+	u32 val;
 	int err;
 
 	err = clk_enable(espi->clk);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	regval = readb(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-	regval |= SSPCR1_SSE;
-	writeb(regval, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val |= SSPCR1_SSE;
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static void ep93xx_spi_disable(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 {
-	u8 regval;
+	u32 val;
 
-	regval = readb(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-	regval &= ~SSPCR1_SSE;
-	writeb(regval, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val &= ~SSPCR1_SSE;
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 
 	clk_disable(espi->clk);
 }
 
 static void ep93xx_spi_enable_interrupts(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 {
-	u8 regval;
+	u32 val;
 
-	regval = readb(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-	regval |= (SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
-	writeb(regval, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val |= (SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 }
 
 static void ep93xx_spi_disable_interrupts(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 {
-	u8 regval;
+	u32 val;
 
-	regval = readb(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-	regval &= ~(SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
-	writeb(regval, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val &= ~(SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -230,47 +230,41 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 		spi->mode, div_cpsr, div_scr, dss);
 	dev_dbg(&espi->pdev->dev, "setup: cr0 %#x\n", cr0);
 
-	writeb(div_cpsr, espi->mmio + SSPCPSR);
-	writew(cr0, espi->mmio + SSPCR0);
+	writel(div_cpsr, espi->mmio + SSPCPSR);
+	writel(cr0, espi->mmio + SSPCR0);
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static void ep93xx_do_write(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)
 {
-	if (t->bits_per_word > 8) {
-		u16 tx_val = 0;
+	u32 val = 0;
 
+	if (t->bits_per_word > 8) {
 		if (t->tx_buf)
-			tx_val = ((u16 *)t->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
-		writew(tx_val, espi->mmio + SSPDR);
-		espi->tx += sizeof(tx_val);
+			val = ((u16 *)t->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
+		espi->tx += 2;
 	} else {
-		u8 tx_val = 0;
-
 		if (t->tx_buf)
-			tx_val = ((u8 *)t->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
-		writeb(tx_val, espi->mmio + SSPDR);
-		espi->tx += sizeof(tx_val);
+			val = ((u8 *)t->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
+		espi->tx += 1;
 	}
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPDR);
 }
 
 static void ep93xx_do_read(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)
 {
-	if (t->bits_per_word > 8) {
-		u16 rx_val;
+	u32 val;
 
-		rx_val = readw(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
+	if (t->bits_per_word > 8) {
 		if (t->rx_buf)
-			((u16 *)t->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = rx_val;
-		espi->rx += sizeof(rx_val);
+			((u16 *)t->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = val;
+		espi->rx += 2;
 	} else {
-		u8 rx_val;
-
-		rx_val = readb(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
 		if (t->rx_buf)
-			((u8 *)t->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = rx_val;
-		espi->rx += sizeof(rx_val);
+			((u8 *)t->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = val;
+		espi->rx += 1;
 	}
 }
 
@@ -291,7 +285,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_read_write(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 	struct spi_transfer *t = msg->state;
 
 	/* read as long as RX FIFO has frames in it */
-	while ((readb(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE)) {
+	while ((readl(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE)) {
 		ep93xx_do_read(espi, t);
 		espi->fifo_level--;
 	}
@@ -593,14 +587,14 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 	 * Just to be sure: flush any data from RX FIFO.
 	 */
 	timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(SPI_TIMEOUT);
-	while (readw(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE) {
+	while (readl(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE) {
 		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
 			dev_warn(&espi->pdev->dev,
 				 "timeout while flushing RX FIFO\n");
 			msg->status = -ETIMEDOUT;
 			return;
 		}
-		readw(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
+		readl(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -649,15 +643,14 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
 static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = dev_id;
-	u8 irq_status = readb(espi->mmio + SSPIIR);
 
 	/*
 	 * If we got ROR (receive overrun) interrupt we know that something is
 	 * wrong. Just abort the message.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(irq_status & SSPIIR_RORIS)) {
+	if (readl(espi->mmio + SSPIIR) & SSPIIR_RORIS) {
 		/* clear the overrun interrupt */
-		writeb(0, espi->mmio + SSPICR);
+		writel(0, espi->mmio + SSPICR);
 		dev_warn(&espi->pdev->dev,
 			 "receive overrun, aborting the message\n");
 		espi->current_msg->status = -EIO;
@@ -857,7 +850,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "DMA setup failed. Falling back to PIO\n");
 
 	/* make sure that the hardware is disabled */
-	writeb(0, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	writel(0, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 
 	error = devm_spi_register_master(&pdev->dev, master);
 	if (error) {
-- 
2.13.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v2 2/7] spi: spi-ep93xx: use 32-bit read/write for all registers

[Chris Packham]

From: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>

All the EP93xx SSP registers are 32-bit. Since most of the upper bits
are unused, this driver tries to be tricky and uses 8 or 16-bit I/O to
access the registers. This really just adds a bit of confusion.

Simplify the I/O by using 32-bit read/write's for all of the registers.

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
[chris: use u32 instead of unsigned int]
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
index 49c42a6c2be1..0bd792020471 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
@@ -113,47 +113,47 @@ struct ep93xx_spi {
 
 static int ep93xx_spi_enable(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 {
-	u8 regval;
+	u32 val;
 	int err;
 
 	err = clk_enable(espi->clk);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	regval = readb(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-	regval |= SSPCR1_SSE;
-	writeb(regval, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val |= SSPCR1_SSE;
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static void ep93xx_spi_disable(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 {
-	u8 regval;
+	u32 val;
 
-	regval = readb(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-	regval &= ~SSPCR1_SSE;
-	writeb(regval, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val &= ~SSPCR1_SSE;
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 
 	clk_disable(espi->clk);
 }
 
 static void ep93xx_spi_enable_interrupts(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 {
-	u8 regval;
+	u32 val;
 
-	regval = readb(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-	regval |= (SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
-	writeb(regval, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val |= (SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 }
 
 static void ep93xx_spi_disable_interrupts(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 {
-	u8 regval;
+	u32 val;
 
-	regval = readb(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-	regval &= ~(SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
-	writeb(regval, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val &= ~(SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -230,47 +230,41 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 		spi->mode, div_cpsr, div_scr, dss);
 	dev_dbg(&espi->pdev->dev, "setup: cr0 %#x\n", cr0);
 
-	writeb(div_cpsr, espi->mmio + SSPCPSR);
-	writew(cr0, espi->mmio + SSPCR0);
+	writel(div_cpsr, espi->mmio + SSPCPSR);
+	writel(cr0, espi->mmio + SSPCR0);
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static void ep93xx_do_write(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)
 {
-	if (t->bits_per_word > 8) {
-		u16 tx_val = 0;
+	u32 val = 0;
 
+	if (t->bits_per_word > 8) {
 		if (t->tx_buf)
-			tx_val = ((u16 *)t->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
-		writew(tx_val, espi->mmio + SSPDR);
-		espi->tx += sizeof(tx_val);
+			val = ((u16 *)t->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
+		espi->tx += 2;
 	} else {
-		u8 tx_val = 0;
-
 		if (t->tx_buf)
-			tx_val = ((u8 *)t->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
-		writeb(tx_val, espi->mmio + SSPDR);
-		espi->tx += sizeof(tx_val);
+			val = ((u8 *)t->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
+		espi->tx += 1;
 	}
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPDR);
 }
 
 static void ep93xx_do_read(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)
 {
-	if (t->bits_per_word > 8) {
-		u16 rx_val;
+	u32 val;
 
-		rx_val = readw(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
+	if (t->bits_per_word > 8) {
 		if (t->rx_buf)
-			((u16 *)t->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = rx_val;
-		espi->rx += sizeof(rx_val);
+			((u16 *)t->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = val;
+		espi->rx += 2;
 	} else {
-		u8 rx_val;
-
-		rx_val = readb(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
 		if (t->rx_buf)
-			((u8 *)t->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = rx_val;
-		espi->rx += sizeof(rx_val);
+			((u8 *)t->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = val;
+		espi->rx += 1;
 	}
 }
 
@@ -291,7 +285,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_read_write(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 	struct spi_transfer *t = msg->state;
 
 	/* read as long as RX FIFO has frames in it */
-	while ((readb(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE)) {
+	while ((readl(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE)) {
 		ep93xx_do_read(espi, t);
 		espi->fifo_level--;
 	}
@@ -593,14 +587,14 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 	 * Just to be sure: flush any data from RX FIFO.
 	 */
 	timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(SPI_TIMEOUT);
-	while (readw(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE) {
+	while (readl(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE) {
 		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
 			dev_warn(&espi->pdev->dev,
 				 "timeout while flushing RX FIFO\n");
 			msg->status = -ETIMEDOUT;
 			return;
 		}
-		readw(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
+		readl(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -649,15 +643,14 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
 static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = dev_id;
-	u8 irq_status = readb(espi->mmio + SSPIIR);
 
 	/*
 	 * If we got ROR (receive overrun) interrupt we know that something is
 	 * wrong. Just abort the message.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(irq_status & SSPIIR_RORIS)) {
+	if (readl(espi->mmio + SSPIIR) & SSPIIR_RORIS) {
 		/* clear the overrun interrupt */
-		writeb(0, espi->mmio + SSPICR);
+		writel(0, espi->mmio + SSPICR);
 		dev_warn(&espi->pdev->dev,
 			 "receive overrun, aborting the message\n");
 		espi->current_msg->status = -EIO;
@@ -857,7 +850,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "DMA setup failed. Falling back to PIO\n");
 
 	/* make sure that the hardware is disabled */
-	writeb(0, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	writel(0, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 
 	error = devm_spi_register_master(&pdev->dev, master);
 	if (error) {
-- 
2.13.0

Applied "spi: spi-ep93xx: use 32-bit read/write for all registers" to the spi tree

[Mark Brown]

The patch

   spi: spi-ep93xx: use 32-bit read/write for all registers

has been applied to the spi tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 8447e4781f033f56cb18c2ec0301ea5d207877fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 08:51:26 +1200
Subject: [PATCH] spi: spi-ep93xx: use 32-bit read/write for all registers

All the EP93xx SSP registers are 32-bit. Since most of the upper bits
are unused, this driver tries to be tricky and uses 8 or 16-bit I/O to
access the registers. This really just adds a bit of confusion.

Simplify the I/O by using 32-bit read/write's for all of the registers.

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
[chris: use u32 instead of unsigned int]
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
index 49c42a6c2be1..0bd792020471 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
@@ -113,47 +113,47 @@ struct ep93xx_spi {
 
 static int ep93xx_spi_enable(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 {
-	u8 regval;
+	u32 val;
 	int err;
 
 	err = clk_enable(espi->clk);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	regval = readb(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-	regval |= SSPCR1_SSE;
-	writeb(regval, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val |= SSPCR1_SSE;
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static void ep93xx_spi_disable(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 {
-	u8 regval;
+	u32 val;
 
-	regval = readb(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-	regval &= ~SSPCR1_SSE;
-	writeb(regval, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val &= ~SSPCR1_SSE;
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 
 	clk_disable(espi->clk);
 }
 
 static void ep93xx_spi_enable_interrupts(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 {
-	u8 regval;
+	u32 val;
 
-	regval = readb(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-	regval |= (SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
-	writeb(regval, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val |= (SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 }
 
 static void ep93xx_spi_disable_interrupts(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 {
-	u8 regval;
+	u32 val;
 
-	regval = readb(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-	regval &= ~(SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
-	writeb(regval, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val &= ~(SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -230,47 +230,41 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 		spi->mode, div_cpsr, div_scr, dss);
 	dev_dbg(&espi->pdev->dev, "setup: cr0 %#x\n", cr0);
 
-	writeb(div_cpsr, espi->mmio + SSPCPSR);
-	writew(cr0, espi->mmio + SSPCR0);
+	writel(div_cpsr, espi->mmio + SSPCPSR);
+	writel(cr0, espi->mmio + SSPCR0);
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static void ep93xx_do_write(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)
 {
-	if (t->bits_per_word > 8) {
-		u16 tx_val = 0;
+	u32 val = 0;
 
+	if (t->bits_per_word > 8) {
 		if (t->tx_buf)
-			tx_val = ((u16 *)t->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
-		writew(tx_val, espi->mmio + SSPDR);
-		espi->tx += sizeof(tx_val);
+			val = ((u16 *)t->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
+		espi->tx += 2;
 	} else {
-		u8 tx_val = 0;
-
 		if (t->tx_buf)
-			tx_val = ((u8 *)t->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
-		writeb(tx_val, espi->mmio + SSPDR);
-		espi->tx += sizeof(tx_val);
+			val = ((u8 *)t->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
+		espi->tx += 1;
 	}
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPDR);
 }
 
 static void ep93xx_do_read(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)
 {
-	if (t->bits_per_word > 8) {
-		u16 rx_val;
+	u32 val;
 
-		rx_val = readw(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
+	if (t->bits_per_word > 8) {
 		if (t->rx_buf)
-			((u16 *)t->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = rx_val;
-		espi->rx += sizeof(rx_val);
+			((u16 *)t->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = val;
+		espi->rx += 2;
 	} else {
-		u8 rx_val;
-
-		rx_val = readb(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
 		if (t->rx_buf)
-			((u8 *)t->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = rx_val;
-		espi->rx += sizeof(rx_val);
+			((u8 *)t->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = val;
+		espi->rx += 1;
 	}
 }
 
@@ -291,7 +285,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_read_write(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 	struct spi_transfer *t = msg->state;
 
 	/* read as long as RX FIFO has frames in it */
-	while ((readb(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE)) {
+	while ((readl(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE)) {
 		ep93xx_do_read(espi, t);
 		espi->fifo_level--;
 	}
@@ -593,14 +587,14 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 	 * Just to be sure: flush any data from RX FIFO.
 	 */
 	timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(SPI_TIMEOUT);
-	while (readw(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE) {
+	while (readl(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE) {
 		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
 			dev_warn(&espi->pdev->dev,
 				 "timeout while flushing RX FIFO\n");
 			msg->status = -ETIMEDOUT;
 			return;
 		}
-		readw(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
+		readl(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -649,15 +643,14 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
 static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = dev_id;
-	u8 irq_status = readb(espi->mmio + SSPIIR);
 
 	/*
 	 * If we got ROR (receive overrun) interrupt we know that something is
 	 * wrong. Just abort the message.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(irq_status & SSPIIR_RORIS)) {
+	if (readl(espi->mmio + SSPIIR) & SSPIIR_RORIS) {
 		/* clear the overrun interrupt */
-		writeb(0, espi->mmio + SSPICR);
+		writel(0, espi->mmio + SSPICR);
 		dev_warn(&espi->pdev->dev,
 			 "receive overrun, aborting the message\n");
 		espi->current_msg->status = -EIO;
@@ -857,7 +850,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "DMA setup failed. Falling back to PIO\n");
 
 	/* make sure that the hardware is disabled */
-	writeb(0, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	writel(0, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 
 	error = devm_spi_register_master(&pdev->dev, master);
 	if (error) {
-- 
2.13.3

[PATCH v2 3/7] spi: spi-ep93xx: add spi master prepare_transfer_hardware()

[Chris Packham]

From: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>

This driver currently enables the hardware at the start of every
message and disabled it when the message is complete. Make it a
bit smarter by adding the prepare_transfer_hardware() and
unprepare_transfer_hardware() callbacks so that the core can
enable/disable the hardware based on spi message queue.

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
[chris: use u32 instead of unsigned int]
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
index 0bd792020471..ce6ec164f2f2 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
@@ -111,33 +111,6 @@ struct ep93xx_spi {
 /* converts bits per word to CR0.DSS value */
 #define bits_per_word_to_dss(bpw)	((bpw) - 1)
 
-static int ep93xx_spi_enable(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
-{
-	u32 val;
-	int err;
-
-	err = clk_enable(espi->clk);
-	if (err)
-		return err;
-
-	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-	val |= SSPCR1_SSE;
-	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static void ep93xx_spi_disable(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
-{
-	u32 val;
-
-	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-	val &= ~SSPCR1_SSE;
-	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-
-	clk_disable(espi->clk);
-}
-
 static void ep93xx_spi_enable_interrupts(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 {
 	u32 val;
@@ -571,17 +544,6 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 {
 	unsigned long timeout;
 	struct spi_transfer *t;
-	int err;
-
-	/*
-	 * Enable the SPI controller and its clock.
-	 */
-	err = ep93xx_spi_enable(espi);
-	if (err) {
-		dev_err(&espi->pdev->dev, "failed to enable SPI controller\n");
-		msg->status = err;
-		return;
-	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Just to be sure: flush any data from RX FIFO.
@@ -619,7 +581,6 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 	 * deselect the device and disable the SPI controller.
 	 */
 	ep93xx_spi_cs_control(msg->spi, false);
-	ep93xx_spi_disable(espi);
 }
 
 static int ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
@@ -679,6 +640,37 @@ static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
+static int ep93xx_spi_prepare_hardware(struct spi_master *master)
+{
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
+	u32 val;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = clk_enable(espi->clk);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val |= SSPCR1_SSE;
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int ep93xx_spi_unprepare_hardware(struct spi_master *master)
+{
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
+	u32 val;
+
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val &= ~SSPCR1_SSE;
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+
+	clk_disable(espi->clk);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static bool ep93xx_spi_dma_filter(struct dma_chan *chan, void *filter_param)
 {
 	if (ep93xx_dma_chan_is_m2p(chan))
@@ -780,6 +772,8 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!master)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	master->prepare_transfer_hardware = ep93xx_spi_prepare_hardware;
+	master->unprepare_transfer_hardware = ep93xx_spi_unprepare_hardware;
 	master->transfer_one_message = ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message;
 	master->bus_num = pdev->id;
 	master->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA | SPI_CS_HIGH;
-- 
2.13.0

Applied "spi: spi-ep93xx: add spi master prepare_transfer_hardware()" to the spi tree

[Mark Brown]

The patch

   spi: spi-ep93xx: add spi master prepare_transfer_hardware()

has been applied to the spi tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 16779622be1c8959d6a665e2b6886bb33885fcb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 08:51:27 +1200
Subject: [PATCH] spi: spi-ep93xx: add spi master prepare_transfer_hardware()

This driver currently enables the hardware at the start of every
message and disabled it when the message is complete. Make it a
bit smarter by adding the prepare_transfer_hardware() and
unprepare_transfer_hardware() callbacks so that the core can
enable/disable the hardware based on spi message queue.

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
[chris: use u32 instead of unsigned int]
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
index 0bd792020471..ce6ec164f2f2 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
@@ -111,33 +111,6 @@ struct ep93xx_spi {
 /* converts bits per word to CR0.DSS value */
 #define bits_per_word_to_dss(bpw)	((bpw) - 1)
 
-static int ep93xx_spi_enable(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
-{
-	u32 val;
-	int err;
-
-	err = clk_enable(espi->clk);
-	if (err)
-		return err;
-
-	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-	val |= SSPCR1_SSE;
-	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static void ep93xx_spi_disable(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
-{
-	u32 val;
-
-	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-	val &= ~SSPCR1_SSE;
-	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-
-	clk_disable(espi->clk);
-}
-
 static void ep93xx_spi_enable_interrupts(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 {
 	u32 val;
@@ -571,17 +544,6 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 {
 	unsigned long timeout;
 	struct spi_transfer *t;
-	int err;
-
-	/*
-	 * Enable the SPI controller and its clock.
-	 */
-	err = ep93xx_spi_enable(espi);
-	if (err) {
-		dev_err(&espi->pdev->dev, "failed to enable SPI controller\n");
-		msg->status = err;
-		return;
-	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Just to be sure: flush any data from RX FIFO.
@@ -619,7 +581,6 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 	 * deselect the device and disable the SPI controller.
 	 */
 	ep93xx_spi_cs_control(msg->spi, false);
-	ep93xx_spi_disable(espi);
 }
 
 static int ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
@@ -679,6 +640,37 @@ static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
+static int ep93xx_spi_prepare_hardware(struct spi_master *master)
+{
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
+	u32 val;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = clk_enable(espi->clk);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val |= SSPCR1_SSE;
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int ep93xx_spi_unprepare_hardware(struct spi_master *master)
+{
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
+	u32 val;
+
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val &= ~SSPCR1_SSE;
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+
+	clk_disable(espi->clk);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static bool ep93xx_spi_dma_filter(struct dma_chan *chan, void *filter_param)
 {
 	if (ep93xx_dma_chan_is_m2p(chan))
@@ -780,6 +772,8 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!master)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	master->prepare_transfer_hardware = ep93xx_spi_prepare_hardware;
+	master->unprepare_transfer_hardware = ep93xx_spi_unprepare_hardware;
 	master->transfer_one_message = ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message;
 	master->bus_num = pdev->id;
 	master->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA | SPI_CS_HIGH;
-- 
2.13.3

[PATCH v2 4/7] spi: spi-ep93xx: absorb the interrupt enable/disable helpers

[Chris Packham]

From: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>

These are each only called once. Just absorb them into the callers.

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
[chris: use u32 instead of unsigned int]
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 32 ++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
index ce6ec164f2f2..041842e0d028 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
@@ -111,24 +111,6 @@ struct ep93xx_spi {
 /* converts bits per word to CR0.DSS value */
 #define bits_per_word_to_dss(bpw)	((bpw) - 1)
 
-static void ep93xx_spi_enable_interrupts(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
-{
-	u32 val;
-
-	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-	val |= (SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
-	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-}
-
-static void ep93xx_spi_disable_interrupts(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
-{
-	u32 val;
-
-	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-	val &= ~(SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
-	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-}
-
 /**
  * ep93xx_spi_calc_divisors() - calculates SPI clock divisors
  * @espi: ep93xx SPI controller struct
@@ -282,7 +264,12 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 	 * FIFO, enable interrupts, and wait for the transfer to complete.
 	 */
 	if (ep93xx_spi_read_write(espi)) {
-		ep93xx_spi_enable_interrupts(espi);
+		u32 val;
+
+		val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+		val |= (SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
+		writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+
 		wait_for_completion(&espi->wait);
 	}
 }
@@ -604,6 +591,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
 static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = dev_id;
+	u32 val;
 
 	/*
 	 * If we got ROR (receive overrun) interrupt we know that something is
@@ -635,8 +623,12 @@ static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	 * any case we disable interrupts and notify the worker to handle
 	 * any post-processing of the message.
 	 */
-	ep93xx_spi_disable_interrupts(espi);
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val &= ~(SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+
 	complete(&espi->wait);
+
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
-- 
2.13.0

Applied "spi: spi-ep93xx: absorb the interrupt enable/disable helpers" to the spi tree

[Mark Brown]

The patch

   spi: spi-ep93xx: absorb the interrupt enable/disable helpers

has been applied to the spi tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From ac8d06df9a1f40a9feb759dd7ef5664328ae7694 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 08:51:28 +1200
Subject: [PATCH] spi: spi-ep93xx: absorb the interrupt enable/disable helpers

These are each only called once. Just absorb them into the callers.

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
[chris: use u32 instead of unsigned int]
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 32 ++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
index ce6ec164f2f2..041842e0d028 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
@@ -111,24 +111,6 @@ struct ep93xx_spi {
 /* converts bits per word to CR0.DSS value */
 #define bits_per_word_to_dss(bpw)	((bpw) - 1)
 
-static void ep93xx_spi_enable_interrupts(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
-{
-	u32 val;
-
-	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-	val |= (SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
-	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-}
-
-static void ep93xx_spi_disable_interrupts(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
-{
-	u32 val;
-
-	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-	val &= ~(SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
-	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-}
-
 /**
  * ep93xx_spi_calc_divisors() - calculates SPI clock divisors
  * @espi: ep93xx SPI controller struct
@@ -282,7 +264,12 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 	 * FIFO, enable interrupts, and wait for the transfer to complete.
 	 */
 	if (ep93xx_spi_read_write(espi)) {
-		ep93xx_spi_enable_interrupts(espi);
+		u32 val;
+
+		val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+		val |= (SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
+		writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+
 		wait_for_completion(&espi->wait);
 	}
 }
@@ -604,6 +591,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
 static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = dev_id;
+	u32 val;
 
 	/*
 	 * If we got ROR (receive overrun) interrupt we know that something is
@@ -635,8 +623,12 @@ static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	 * any case we disable interrupts and notify the worker to handle
 	 * any post-processing of the message.
 	 */
-	ep93xx_spi_disable_interrupts(espi);
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val &= ~(SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+
 	complete(&espi->wait);
+
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
-- 
2.13.3

[PATCH v2 5/7] spi: spi-ep93xx: pass the spi_master pointer around

[Chris Packham]

From: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>

Change the parameters for some of the functions so that the spi_master
pointer is passed around instead of the private data ep93xx_spi pointer.

This allows removing the 'pdev' member of the private data and will
help with some later cleanup.

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
index 041842e0d028..2d80e36f5015 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
@@ -70,7 +70,6 @@
 
 /**
  * struct ep93xx_spi - EP93xx SPI controller structure
- * @pdev: pointer to platform device
  * @clk: clock for the controller
  * @mmio: pointer to ioremap()'d registers
  * @sspdr_phys: physical address of the SSPDR register
@@ -90,7 +89,6 @@
  *            the client
  */
 struct ep93xx_spi {
-	const struct platform_device	*pdev;
 	struct clk			*clk;
 	void __iomem			*mmio;
 	unsigned long			sspdr_phys;
@@ -113,15 +111,15 @@ struct ep93xx_spi {
 
 /**
  * ep93xx_spi_calc_divisors() - calculates SPI clock divisors
- * @espi: ep93xx SPI controller struct
+ * @master: SPI master
  * @rate: desired SPI output clock rate
  * @div_cpsr: pointer to return the cpsr (pre-scaler) divider
  * @div_scr: pointer to return the scr divider
  */
-static int ep93xx_spi_calc_divisors(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
+static int ep93xx_spi_calc_divisors(struct spi_master *master,
 				    u32 rate, u8 *div_cpsr, u8 *div_scr)
 {
-	struct spi_master *master = platform_get_drvdata(espi->pdev);
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 	unsigned long spi_clk_rate = clk_get_rate(espi->clk);
 	int cpsr, scr;
 
@@ -162,17 +160,18 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_cs_control(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable)
 		gpio_set_value(spi->cs_gpio, !enable);
 }
 
-static int ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
+static int ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(struct spi_master *master,
 				 struct spi_device *spi,
 				 struct spi_transfer *xfer)
 {
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 	u8 dss = bits_per_word_to_dss(xfer->bits_per_word);
 	u8 div_cpsr = 0;
 	u8 div_scr = 0;
 	u16 cr0;
 	int err;
 
-	err = ep93xx_spi_calc_divisors(espi, xfer->speed_hz,
+	err = ep93xx_spi_calc_divisors(master, xfer->speed_hz,
 				       &div_cpsr, &div_scr);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
@@ -181,9 +180,9 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 	cr0 |= (spi->mode & (SPI_CPHA | SPI_CPOL)) << SSPCR0_MODE_SHIFT;
 	cr0 |= dss;
 
-	dev_dbg(&espi->pdev->dev, "setup: mode %d, cpsr %d, scr %d, dss %d\n",
+	dev_dbg(&master->dev, "setup: mode %d, cpsr %d, scr %d, dss %d\n",
 		spi->mode, div_cpsr, div_scr, dss);
-	dev_dbg(&espi->pdev->dev, "setup: cr0 %#x\n", cr0);
+	dev_dbg(&master->dev, "setup: cr0 %#x\n", cr0);
 
 	writel(div_cpsr, espi->mmio + SSPCPSR);
 	writel(cr0, espi->mmio + SSPCR0);
@@ -234,8 +233,9 @@ static void ep93xx_do_read(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)
  * When this function is finished, RX FIFO should be empty and TX FIFO should be
  * full.
  */
-static int ep93xx_spi_read_write(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
+static int ep93xx_spi_read_write(struct spi_master *master)
 {
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 	struct spi_message *msg = espi->current_msg;
 	struct spi_transfer *t = msg->state;
 
@@ -257,13 +257,15 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_read_write(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 	return -EINPROGRESS;
 }
 
-static void ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
+static void ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(struct spi_master *master)
 {
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
+
 	/*
 	 * Now everything is set up for the current transfer. We prime the TX
 	 * FIFO, enable interrupts, and wait for the transfer to complete.
 	 */
-	if (ep93xx_spi_read_write(espi)) {
+	if (ep93xx_spi_read_write(master)) {
 		u32 val;
 
 		val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
@@ -276,7 +278,7 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 
 /**
  * ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare() - prepares a DMA transfer
- * @espi: ep93xx SPI controller struct
+ * @master: SPI master
  * @dir: DMA transfer direction
  *
  * Function configures the DMA, maps the buffer and prepares the DMA
@@ -284,8 +286,10 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
  * in case of failure.
  */
 static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *
-ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
+ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct spi_master *master,
+		       enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
 {
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 	struct spi_transfer *t = espi->current_msg->state;
 	struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *txd;
 	enum dma_slave_buswidth buswidth;
@@ -361,7 +365,7 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
 	}
 
 	if (WARN_ON(len)) {
-		dev_warn(&espi->pdev->dev, "len = %zu expected 0!\n", len);
+		dev_warn(&master->dev, "len = %zu expected 0!\n", len);
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 	}
 
@@ -379,15 +383,16 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
 
 /**
  * ep93xx_spi_dma_finish() - finishes with a DMA transfer
- * @espi: ep93xx SPI controller struct
+ * @master: SPI master
  * @dir: DMA transfer direction
  *
  * Function finishes with the DMA transfer. After this, the DMA buffer is
  * unmapped.
  */
-static void ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
+static void ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(struct spi_master *master,
 				  enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
 {
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 	struct dma_chan *chan;
 	struct sg_table *sgt;
 
@@ -407,22 +412,23 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_dma_callback(void *callback_param)
 	complete(callback_param);
 }
 
-static void ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
+static void ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct spi_master *master)
 {
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 	struct spi_message *msg = espi->current_msg;
 	struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *rxd, *txd;
 
-	rxd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(espi, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
+	rxd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(master, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
 	if (IS_ERR(rxd)) {
-		dev_err(&espi->pdev->dev, "DMA RX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(rxd));
+		dev_err(&master->dev, "DMA RX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(rxd));
 		msg->status = PTR_ERR(rxd);
 		return;
 	}
 
-	txd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(espi, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
+	txd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(master, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
 	if (IS_ERR(txd)) {
-		ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(espi, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
-		dev_err(&espi->pdev->dev, "DMA TX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(txd));
+		ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
+		dev_err(&master->dev, "DMA TX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(txd));
 		msg->status = PTR_ERR(txd);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -440,13 +446,13 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 
 	wait_for_completion(&espi->wait);
 
-	ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(espi, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
-	ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(espi, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
+	ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
+	ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
 }
 
 /**
  * ep93xx_spi_process_transfer() - processes one SPI transfer
- * @espi: ep93xx SPI controller struct
+ * @master: SPI master
  * @msg: current message
  * @t: transfer to process
  *
@@ -454,17 +460,18 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
  * transfer is complete (may sleep) and updates @msg->status based on whether
  * transfer was successfully processed or not.
  */
-static void ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
+static void ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(struct spi_master *master,
 					struct spi_message *msg,
 					struct spi_transfer *t)
 {
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 	int err;
 
 	msg->state = t;
 
-	err = ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(espi, msg->spi, t);
+	err = ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(master, msg->spi, t);
 	if (err) {
-		dev_err(&espi->pdev->dev,
+		dev_err(&master->dev,
 			"failed to setup chip for transfer\n");
 		msg->status = err;
 		return;
@@ -479,9 +486,9 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 	 * So in these cases we will be using PIO and don't bother for DMA.
 	 */
 	if (espi->dma_rx && t->len > SPI_FIFO_SIZE)
-		ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(espi);
+		ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(master);
 	else
-		ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(espi);
+		ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(master);
 
 	/*
 	 * In case of error during transmit, we bail out from processing
@@ -516,7 +523,7 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 
 /*
  * ep93xx_spi_process_message() - process one SPI message
- * @espi: ep93xx SPI controller struct
+ * @master: SPI master
  * @msg: message to process
  *
  * This function processes a single SPI message. We go through all transfers in
@@ -526,9 +533,10 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
  * @msg->status contains %0 in case of success or negative error code in case of
  * failure.
  */
-static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
+static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct spi_master *master,
 				       struct spi_message *msg)
 {
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 	unsigned long timeout;
 	struct spi_transfer *t;
 
@@ -538,7 +546,7 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 	timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(SPI_TIMEOUT);
 	while (readl(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE) {
 		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
-			dev_warn(&espi->pdev->dev,
+			dev_warn(&master->dev,
 				 "timeout while flushing RX FIFO\n");
 			msg->status = -ETIMEDOUT;
 			return;
@@ -558,7 +566,7 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 	ep93xx_spi_cs_control(msg->spi, true);
 
 	list_for_each_entry(t, &msg->transfers, transfer_list) {
-		ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(espi, msg, t);
+		ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(master, msg, t);
 		if (msg->status)
 			break;
 	}
@@ -580,7 +588,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
 	msg->actual_length = 0;
 
 	espi->current_msg = msg;
-	ep93xx_spi_process_message(espi, msg);
+	ep93xx_spi_process_message(master, msg);
 	espi->current_msg = NULL;
 
 	spi_finalize_current_message(master);
@@ -590,7 +598,8 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
 
 static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
-	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = dev_id;
+	struct spi_master *master = dev_id;
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 	u32 val;
 
 	/*
@@ -600,7 +609,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	if (readl(espi->mmio + SSPIIR) & SSPIIR_RORIS) {
 		/* clear the overrun interrupt */
 		writel(0, espi->mmio + SSPICR);
-		dev_warn(&espi->pdev->dev,
+		dev_warn(&master->dev,
 			 "receive overrun, aborting the message\n");
 		espi->current_msg->status = -EIO;
 	} else {
@@ -608,7 +617,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 		 * Interrupt is either RX (RIS) or TX (TIS). For both cases we
 		 * simply execute next data transfer.
 		 */
-		if (ep93xx_spi_read_write(espi)) {
+		if (ep93xx_spi_read_write(master)) {
 			/*
 			 * In normal case, there still is some processing left
 			 * for current transfer. Let's wait for the next
@@ -815,7 +824,6 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	 */
 	master->max_speed_hz = clk_get_rate(espi->clk) / 2;
 	master->min_speed_hz = clk_get_rate(espi->clk) / (254 * 256);
-	espi->pdev = pdev;
 
 	espi->sspdr_phys = res->start + SSPDR;
 
@@ -826,7 +834,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	error = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, ep93xx_spi_interrupt,
-				0, "ep93xx-spi", espi);
+				0, "ep93xx-spi", master);
 	if (error) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request irq\n");
 		goto fail_release_master;
-- 
2.13.0

Applied "spi: spi-ep93xx: pass the spi_master pointer around" to the spi tree

[Mark Brown]

The patch

   spi: spi-ep93xx: pass the spi_master pointer around

has been applied to the spi tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 48738831018003c80f1131e77a25b8e832bec6f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 08:51:29 +1200
Subject: [PATCH] spi: spi-ep93xx: pass the spi_master pointer around

Change the parameters for some of the functions so that the spi_master
pointer is passed around instead of the private data ep93xx_spi pointer.

This allows removing the 'pdev' member of the private data and will
help with some later cleanup.

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
index 041842e0d028..2d80e36f5015 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
@@ -70,7 +70,6 @@
 
 /**
  * struct ep93xx_spi - EP93xx SPI controller structure
- * @pdev: pointer to platform device
  * @clk: clock for the controller
  * @mmio: pointer to ioremap()'d registers
  * @sspdr_phys: physical address of the SSPDR register
@@ -90,7 +89,6 @@
  *            the client
  */
 struct ep93xx_spi {
-	const struct platform_device	*pdev;
 	struct clk			*clk;
 	void __iomem			*mmio;
 	unsigned long			sspdr_phys;
@@ -113,15 +111,15 @@ struct ep93xx_spi {
 
 /**
  * ep93xx_spi_calc_divisors() - calculates SPI clock divisors
- * @espi: ep93xx SPI controller struct
+ * @master: SPI master
  * @rate: desired SPI output clock rate
  * @div_cpsr: pointer to return the cpsr (pre-scaler) divider
  * @div_scr: pointer to return the scr divider
  */
-static int ep93xx_spi_calc_divisors(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
+static int ep93xx_spi_calc_divisors(struct spi_master *master,
 				    u32 rate, u8 *div_cpsr, u8 *div_scr)
 {
-	struct spi_master *master = platform_get_drvdata(espi->pdev);
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 	unsigned long spi_clk_rate = clk_get_rate(espi->clk);
 	int cpsr, scr;
 
@@ -162,17 +160,18 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_cs_control(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable)
 		gpio_set_value(spi->cs_gpio, !enable);
 }
 
-static int ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
+static int ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(struct spi_master *master,
 				 struct spi_device *spi,
 				 struct spi_transfer *xfer)
 {
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 	u8 dss = bits_per_word_to_dss(xfer->bits_per_word);
 	u8 div_cpsr = 0;
 	u8 div_scr = 0;
 	u16 cr0;
 	int err;
 
-	err = ep93xx_spi_calc_divisors(espi, xfer->speed_hz,
+	err = ep93xx_spi_calc_divisors(master, xfer->speed_hz,
 				       &div_cpsr, &div_scr);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
@@ -181,9 +180,9 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 	cr0 |= (spi->mode & (SPI_CPHA | SPI_CPOL)) << SSPCR0_MODE_SHIFT;
 	cr0 |= dss;
 
-	dev_dbg(&espi->pdev->dev, "setup: mode %d, cpsr %d, scr %d, dss %d\n",
+	dev_dbg(&master->dev, "setup: mode %d, cpsr %d, scr %d, dss %d\n",
 		spi->mode, div_cpsr, div_scr, dss);
-	dev_dbg(&espi->pdev->dev, "setup: cr0 %#x\n", cr0);
+	dev_dbg(&master->dev, "setup: cr0 %#x\n", cr0);
 
 	writel(div_cpsr, espi->mmio + SSPCPSR);
 	writel(cr0, espi->mmio + SSPCR0);
@@ -234,8 +233,9 @@ static void ep93xx_do_read(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)
  * When this function is finished, RX FIFO should be empty and TX FIFO should be
  * full.
  */
-static int ep93xx_spi_read_write(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
+static int ep93xx_spi_read_write(struct spi_master *master)
 {
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 	struct spi_message *msg = espi->current_msg;
 	struct spi_transfer *t = msg->state;
 
@@ -257,13 +257,15 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_read_write(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 	return -EINPROGRESS;
 }
 
-static void ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
+static void ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(struct spi_master *master)
 {
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
+
 	/*
 	 * Now everything is set up for the current transfer. We prime the TX
 	 * FIFO, enable interrupts, and wait for the transfer to complete.
 	 */
-	if (ep93xx_spi_read_write(espi)) {
+	if (ep93xx_spi_read_write(master)) {
 		u32 val;
 
 		val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
@@ -276,7 +278,7 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 
 /**
  * ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare() - prepares a DMA transfer
- * @espi: ep93xx SPI controller struct
+ * @master: SPI master
  * @dir: DMA transfer direction
  *
  * Function configures the DMA, maps the buffer and prepares the DMA
@@ -284,8 +286,10 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
  * in case of failure.
  */
 static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *
-ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
+ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct spi_master *master,
+		       enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
 {
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 	struct spi_transfer *t = espi->current_msg->state;
 	struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *txd;
 	enum dma_slave_buswidth buswidth;
@@ -361,7 +365,7 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
 	}
 
 	if (WARN_ON(len)) {
-		dev_warn(&espi->pdev->dev, "len = %zu expected 0!\n", len);
+		dev_warn(&master->dev, "len = %zu expected 0!\n", len);
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 	}
 
@@ -379,15 +383,16 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
 
 /**
  * ep93xx_spi_dma_finish() - finishes with a DMA transfer
- * @espi: ep93xx SPI controller struct
+ * @master: SPI master
  * @dir: DMA transfer direction
  *
  * Function finishes with the DMA transfer. After this, the DMA buffer is
  * unmapped.
  */
-static void ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
+static void ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(struct spi_master *master,
 				  enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
 {
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 	struct dma_chan *chan;
 	struct sg_table *sgt;
 
@@ -407,22 +412,23 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_dma_callback(void *callback_param)
 	complete(callback_param);
 }
 
-static void ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
+static void ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct spi_master *master)
 {
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 	struct spi_message *msg = espi->current_msg;
 	struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *rxd, *txd;
 
-	rxd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(espi, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
+	rxd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(master, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
 	if (IS_ERR(rxd)) {
-		dev_err(&espi->pdev->dev, "DMA RX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(rxd));
+		dev_err(&master->dev, "DMA RX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(rxd));
 		msg->status = PTR_ERR(rxd);
 		return;
 	}
 
-	txd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(espi, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
+	txd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(master, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
 	if (IS_ERR(txd)) {
-		ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(espi, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
-		dev_err(&espi->pdev->dev, "DMA TX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(txd));
+		ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
+		dev_err(&master->dev, "DMA TX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(txd));
 		msg->status = PTR_ERR(txd);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -440,13 +446,13 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
 
 	wait_for_completion(&espi->wait);
 
-	ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(espi, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
-	ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(espi, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
+	ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
+	ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
 }
 
 /**
  * ep93xx_spi_process_transfer() - processes one SPI transfer
- * @espi: ep93xx SPI controller struct
+ * @master: SPI master
  * @msg: current message
  * @t: transfer to process
  *
@@ -454,17 +460,18 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
  * transfer is complete (may sleep) and updates @msg->status based on whether
  * transfer was successfully processed or not.
  */
-static void ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
+static void ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(struct spi_master *master,
 					struct spi_message *msg,
 					struct spi_transfer *t)
 {
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 	int err;
 
 	msg->state = t;
 
-	err = ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(espi, msg->spi, t);
+	err = ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(master, msg->spi, t);
 	if (err) {
-		dev_err(&espi->pdev->dev,
+		dev_err(&master->dev,
 			"failed to setup chip for transfer\n");
 		msg->status = err;
 		return;
@@ -479,9 +486,9 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 	 * So in these cases we will be using PIO and don't bother for DMA.
 	 */
 	if (espi->dma_rx && t->len > SPI_FIFO_SIZE)
-		ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(espi);
+		ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(master);
 	else
-		ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(espi);
+		ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(master);
 
 	/*
 	 * In case of error during transmit, we bail out from processing
@@ -516,7 +523,7 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 
 /*
  * ep93xx_spi_process_message() - process one SPI message
- * @espi: ep93xx SPI controller struct
+ * @master: SPI master
  * @msg: message to process
  *
  * This function processes a single SPI message. We go through all transfers in
@@ -526,9 +533,10 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
  * @msg->status contains %0 in case of success or negative error code in case of
  * failure.
  */
-static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
+static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct spi_master *master,
 				       struct spi_message *msg)
 {
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 	unsigned long timeout;
 	struct spi_transfer *t;
 
@@ -538,7 +546,7 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 	timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(SPI_TIMEOUT);
 	while (readl(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE) {
 		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
-			dev_warn(&espi->pdev->dev,
+			dev_warn(&master->dev,
 				 "timeout while flushing RX FIFO\n");
 			msg->status = -ETIMEDOUT;
 			return;
@@ -558,7 +566,7 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
 	ep93xx_spi_cs_control(msg->spi, true);
 
 	list_for_each_entry(t, &msg->transfers, transfer_list) {
-		ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(espi, msg, t);
+		ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(master, msg, t);
 		if (msg->status)
 			break;
 	}
@@ -580,7 +588,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
 	msg->actual_length = 0;
 
 	espi->current_msg = msg;
-	ep93xx_spi_process_message(espi, msg);
+	ep93xx_spi_process_message(master, msg);
 	espi->current_msg = NULL;
 
 	spi_finalize_current_message(master);
@@ -590,7 +598,8 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
 
 static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
-	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = dev_id;
+	struct spi_master *master = dev_id;
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 	u32 val;
 
 	/*
@@ -600,7 +609,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	if (readl(espi->mmio + SSPIIR) & SSPIIR_RORIS) {
 		/* clear the overrun interrupt */
 		writel(0, espi->mmio + SSPICR);
-		dev_warn(&espi->pdev->dev,
+		dev_warn(&master->dev,
 			 "receive overrun, aborting the message\n");
 		espi->current_msg->status = -EIO;
 	} else {
@@ -608,7 +617,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 		 * Interrupt is either RX (RIS) or TX (TIS). For both cases we
 		 * simply execute next data transfer.
 		 */
-		if (ep93xx_spi_read_write(espi)) {
+		if (ep93xx_spi_read_write(master)) {
 			/*
 			 * In normal case, there still is some processing left
 			 * for current transfer. Let's wait for the next
@@ -815,7 +824,6 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	 */
 	master->max_speed_hz = clk_get_rate(espi->clk) / 2;
 	master->min_speed_hz = clk_get_rate(espi->clk) / (254 * 256);
-	espi->pdev = pdev;
 
 	espi->sspdr_phys = res->start + SSPDR;
 
@@ -826,7 +834,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	error = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, ep93xx_spi_interrupt,
-				0, "ep93xx-spi", espi);
+				0, "ep93xx-spi", master);
 	if (error) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request irq\n");
 		goto fail_release_master;
-- 
2.13.3

[PATCH v2 6/7] spi: spi-ep93xx: remove private data 'current_msg'

[Chris Packham]

From: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>

The currently in-flight message can be found from the spi master.
Use that instead and remove the private data pointer.

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 16 +++++-----------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
index 2d80e36f5015..cf7d8175bf79 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
@@ -74,7 +74,6 @@
  * @mmio: pointer to ioremap()'d registers
  * @sspdr_phys: physical address of the SSPDR register
  * @wait: wait here until given transfer is completed
- * @current_msg: message that is currently processed (or %NULL if none)
  * @tx: current byte in transfer to transmit
  * @rx: current byte in transfer to receive
  * @fifo_level: how full is FIFO (%0..%SPI_FIFO_SIZE - %1). Receiving one
@@ -93,7 +92,6 @@ struct ep93xx_spi {
 	void __iomem			*mmio;
 	unsigned long			sspdr_phys;
 	struct completion		wait;
-	struct spi_message		*current_msg;
 	size_t				tx;
 	size_t				rx;
 	size_t				fifo_level;
@@ -236,8 +234,7 @@ static void ep93xx_do_read(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)
 static int ep93xx_spi_read_write(struct spi_master *master)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
-	struct spi_message *msg = espi->current_msg;
-	struct spi_transfer *t = msg->state;
+	struct spi_transfer *t = master->cur_msg->state;
 
 	/* read as long as RX FIFO has frames in it */
 	while ((readl(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE)) {
@@ -290,7 +287,7 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct spi_master *master,
 		       enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
-	struct spi_transfer *t = espi->current_msg->state;
+	struct spi_transfer *t = master->cur_msg->state;
 	struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *txd;
 	enum dma_slave_buswidth buswidth;
 	struct dma_slave_config conf;
@@ -415,13 +412,12 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_dma_callback(void *callback_param)
 static void ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct spi_master *master)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
-	struct spi_message *msg = espi->current_msg;
 	struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *rxd, *txd;
 
 	rxd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(master, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
 	if (IS_ERR(rxd)) {
 		dev_err(&master->dev, "DMA RX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(rxd));
-		msg->status = PTR_ERR(rxd);
+		master->cur_msg->status = PTR_ERR(rxd);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -429,7 +425,7 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct spi_master *master)
 	if (IS_ERR(txd)) {
 		ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
 		dev_err(&master->dev, "DMA TX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(txd));
-		msg->status = PTR_ERR(txd);
+		master->cur_msg->status = PTR_ERR(txd);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -587,9 +583,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
 	msg->status = 0;
 	msg->actual_length = 0;
 
-	espi->current_msg = msg;
 	ep93xx_spi_process_message(master, msg);
-	espi->current_msg = NULL;
 
 	spi_finalize_current_message(master);
 
@@ -611,7 +605,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 		writel(0, espi->mmio + SSPICR);
 		dev_warn(&master->dev,
 			 "receive overrun, aborting the message\n");
-		espi->current_msg->status = -EIO;
+		master->cur_msg->status = -EIO;
 	} else {
 		/*
 		 * Interrupt is either RX (RIS) or TX (TIS). For both cases we
-- 
2.13.0

[PATCH v2 7/7] spi: spi-ep93xx: use the default master transfer queueing mechanism

[Chris Packham]

From: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>

Update this driver to the default implementation of transfer_one_message().

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 322 ++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
 1 file changed, 108 insertions(+), 214 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
index cf7d8175bf79..e5cc07357746 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
@@ -73,7 +73,6 @@
  * @clk: clock for the controller
  * @mmio: pointer to ioremap()'d registers
  * @sspdr_phys: physical address of the SSPDR register
- * @wait: wait here until given transfer is completed
  * @tx: current byte in transfer to transmit
  * @rx: current byte in transfer to receive
  * @fifo_level: how full is FIFO (%0..%SPI_FIFO_SIZE - %1). Receiving one
@@ -91,7 +90,6 @@ struct ep93xx_spi {
 	struct clk			*clk;
 	void __iomem			*mmio;
 	unsigned long			sspdr_phys;
-	struct completion		wait;
 	size_t				tx;
 	size_t				rx;
 	size_t				fifo_level;
@@ -123,8 +121,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_calc_divisors(struct spi_master *master,
 
 	/*
 	 * Make sure that max value is between values supported by the
-	 * controller. Note that minimum value is already checked in
-	 * ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message().
+	 * controller.
 	 */
 	rate = clamp(rate, master->min_speed_hz, master->max_speed_hz);
 
@@ -149,15 +146,6 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_calc_divisors(struct spi_master *master,
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
-static void ep93xx_spi_cs_control(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable)
-{
-	if (spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH)
-		enable = !enable;
-
-	if (gpio_is_valid(spi->cs_gpio))
-		gpio_set_value(spi->cs_gpio, !enable);
-}
-
 static int ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(struct spi_master *master,
 				 struct spi_device *spi,
 				 struct spi_transfer *xfer)
@@ -188,34 +176,38 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(struct spi_master *master,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void ep93xx_do_write(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)
+static void ep93xx_do_write(struct spi_master *master)
 {
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
+	struct spi_transfer *xfer = master->cur_msg->state;
 	u32 val = 0;
 
-	if (t->bits_per_word > 8) {
-		if (t->tx_buf)
-			val = ((u16 *)t->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
+	if (xfer->bits_per_word > 8) {
+		if (xfer->tx_buf)
+			val = ((u16 *)xfer->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
 		espi->tx += 2;
 	} else {
-		if (t->tx_buf)
-			val = ((u8 *)t->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
+		if (xfer->tx_buf)
+			val = ((u8 *)xfer->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
 		espi->tx += 1;
 	}
 	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPDR);
 }
 
-static void ep93xx_do_read(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)
+static void ep93xx_do_read(struct spi_master *master)
 {
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
+	struct spi_transfer *xfer = master->cur_msg->state;
 	u32 val;
 
 	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
-	if (t->bits_per_word > 8) {
-		if (t->rx_buf)
-			((u16 *)t->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = val;
+	if (xfer->bits_per_word > 8) {
+		if (xfer->rx_buf)
+			((u16 *)xfer->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = val;
 		espi->rx += 2;
 	} else {
-		if (t->rx_buf)
-			((u8 *)t->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = val;
+		if (xfer->rx_buf)
+			((u8 *)xfer->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = val;
 		espi->rx += 1;
 	}
 }
@@ -234,45 +226,26 @@ static void ep93xx_do_read(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)
 static int ep93xx_spi_read_write(struct spi_master *master)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
-	struct spi_transfer *t = master->cur_msg->state;
+	struct spi_transfer *xfer = master->cur_msg->state;
 
 	/* read as long as RX FIFO has frames in it */
 	while ((readl(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE)) {
-		ep93xx_do_read(espi, t);
+		ep93xx_do_read(master);
 		espi->fifo_level--;
 	}
 
 	/* write as long as TX FIFO has room */
-	while (espi->fifo_level < SPI_FIFO_SIZE && espi->tx < t->len) {
-		ep93xx_do_write(espi, t);
+	while (espi->fifo_level < SPI_FIFO_SIZE && espi->tx < xfer->len) {
+		ep93xx_do_write(master);
 		espi->fifo_level++;
 	}
 
-	if (espi->rx == t->len)
+	if (espi->rx == xfer->len)
 		return 0;
 
 	return -EINPROGRESS;
 }
 
-static void ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(struct spi_master *master)
-{
-	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
-
-	/*
-	 * Now everything is set up for the current transfer. We prime the TX
-	 * FIFO, enable interrupts, and wait for the transfer to complete.
-	 */
-	if (ep93xx_spi_read_write(master)) {
-		u32 val;
-
-		val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-		val |= (SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
-		writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-
-		wait_for_completion(&espi->wait);
-	}
-}
-
 /**
  * ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare() - prepares a DMA transfer
  * @master: SPI master
@@ -287,7 +260,7 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct spi_master *master,
 		       enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
-	struct spi_transfer *t = master->cur_msg->state;
+	struct spi_transfer *xfer = master->cur_msg->state;
 	struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *txd;
 	enum dma_slave_buswidth buswidth;
 	struct dma_slave_config conf;
@@ -295,10 +268,10 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct spi_master *master,
 	struct sg_table *sgt;
 	struct dma_chan *chan;
 	const void *buf, *pbuf;
-	size_t len = t->len;
+	size_t len = xfer->len;
 	int i, ret, nents;
 
-	if (t->bits_per_word > 8)
+	if (xfer->bits_per_word > 8)
 		buswidth = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES;
 	else
 		buswidth = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE;
@@ -308,14 +281,14 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct spi_master *master,
 
 	if (dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) {
 		chan = espi->dma_rx;
-		buf = t->rx_buf;
+		buf = xfer->rx_buf;
 		sgt = &espi->rx_sgt;
 
 		conf.src_addr = espi->sspdr_phys;
 		conf.src_addr_width = buswidth;
 	} else {
 		chan = espi->dma_tx;
-		buf = t->tx_buf;
+		buf = xfer->tx_buf;
 		sgt = &espi->tx_sgt;
 
 		conf.dst_addr = espi->sspdr_phys;
@@ -406,10 +379,15 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(struct spi_master *master,
 
 static void ep93xx_spi_dma_callback(void *callback_param)
 {
-	complete(callback_param);
+	struct spi_master *master = callback_param;
+
+	ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
+	ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
+
+	spi_finalize_current_transfer(master);
 }
 
-static void ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct spi_master *master)
+static int ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct spi_master *master)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 	struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *rxd, *txd;
@@ -417,177 +395,29 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct spi_master *master)
 	rxd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(master, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
 	if (IS_ERR(rxd)) {
 		dev_err(&master->dev, "DMA RX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(rxd));
-		master->cur_msg->status = PTR_ERR(rxd);
-		return;
+		return PTR_ERR(rxd);
 	}
 
 	txd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(master, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
 	if (IS_ERR(txd)) {
 		ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
 		dev_err(&master->dev, "DMA TX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(txd));
-		master->cur_msg->status = PTR_ERR(txd);
-		return;
+		return PTR_ERR(txd);
 	}
 
 	/* We are ready when RX is done */
 	rxd->callback = ep93xx_spi_dma_callback;
-	rxd->callback_param = &espi->wait;
+	rxd->callback_param = master;
 
-	/* Now submit both descriptors and wait while they finish */
+	/* Now submit both descriptors and start DMA */
 	dmaengine_submit(rxd);
 	dmaengine_submit(txd);
 
 	dma_async_issue_pending(espi->dma_rx);
 	dma_async_issue_pending(espi->dma_tx);
 
-	wait_for_completion(&espi->wait);
-
-	ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
-	ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
-}
-
-/**
- * ep93xx_spi_process_transfer() - processes one SPI transfer
- * @master: SPI master
- * @msg: current message
- * @t: transfer to process
- *
- * This function processes one SPI transfer given in @t. Function waits until
- * transfer is complete (may sleep) and updates @msg->status based on whether
- * transfer was successfully processed or not.
- */
-static void ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(struct spi_master *master,
-					struct spi_message *msg,
-					struct spi_transfer *t)
-{
-	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
-	int err;
-
-	msg->state = t;
-
-	err = ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(master, msg->spi, t);
-	if (err) {
-		dev_err(&master->dev,
-			"failed to setup chip for transfer\n");
-		msg->status = err;
-		return;
-	}
-
-	espi->rx = 0;
-	espi->tx = 0;
-
-	/*
-	 * There is no point of setting up DMA for the transfers which will
-	 * fit into the FIFO and can be transferred with a single interrupt.
-	 * So in these cases we will be using PIO and don't bother for DMA.
-	 */
-	if (espi->dma_rx && t->len > SPI_FIFO_SIZE)
-		ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(master);
-	else
-		ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(master);
-
-	/*
-	 * In case of error during transmit, we bail out from processing
-	 * the message.
-	 */
-	if (msg->status)
-		return;
-
-	msg->actual_length += t->len;
-
-	/*
-	 * After this transfer is finished, perform any possible
-	 * post-transfer actions requested by the protocol driver.
-	 */
-	if (t->delay_usecs) {
-		set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-		schedule_timeout(usecs_to_jiffies(t->delay_usecs));
-	}
-	if (t->cs_change) {
-		if (!list_is_last(&t->transfer_list, &msg->transfers)) {
-			/*
-			 * In case protocol driver is asking us to drop the
-			 * chipselect briefly, we let the scheduler to handle
-			 * any "delay" here.
-			 */
-			ep93xx_spi_cs_control(msg->spi, false);
-			cond_resched();
-			ep93xx_spi_cs_control(msg->spi, true);
-		}
-	}
-}
-
-/*
- * ep93xx_spi_process_message() - process one SPI message
- * @master: SPI master
- * @msg: message to process
- *
- * This function processes a single SPI message. We go through all transfers in
- * the message and pass them to ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(). Chipselect is
- * asserted during the whole message (unless per transfer cs_change is set).
- *
- * @msg->status contains %0 in case of success or negative error code in case of
- * failure.
- */
-static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct spi_master *master,
-				       struct spi_message *msg)
-{
-	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
-	unsigned long timeout;
-	struct spi_transfer *t;
-
-	/*
-	 * Just to be sure: flush any data from RX FIFO.
-	 */
-	timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(SPI_TIMEOUT);
-	while (readl(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE) {
-		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
-			dev_warn(&master->dev,
-				 "timeout while flushing RX FIFO\n");
-			msg->status = -ETIMEDOUT;
-			return;
-		}
-		readl(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * We explicitly handle FIFO level. This way we don't have to check TX
-	 * FIFO status using %SSPSR_TNF bit which may cause RX FIFO overruns.
-	 */
-	espi->fifo_level = 0;
-
-	/*
-	 * Assert the chipselect.
-	 */
-	ep93xx_spi_cs_control(msg->spi, true);
-
-	list_for_each_entry(t, &msg->transfers, transfer_list) {
-		ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(master, msg, t);
-		if (msg->status)
-			break;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Now the whole message is transferred (or failed for some reason). We
-	 * deselect the device and disable the SPI controller.
-	 */
-	ep93xx_spi_cs_control(msg->spi, false);
-}
-
-static int ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
-					   struct spi_message *msg)
-{
-	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
-
-	msg->state = NULL;
-	msg->status = 0;
-	msg->actual_length = 0;
-
-	ep93xx_spi_process_message(master, msg);
-
-	spi_finalize_current_message(master);
-
-	return 0;
+	/* signal that we need to wait for completion */
+	return 1;
 }
 
 static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
@@ -630,11 +460,76 @@ static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	val &= ~(SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
 	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 
-	complete(&espi->wait);
+	spi_finalize_current_transfer(master);
 
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
+static int ep93xx_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master,
+				   struct spi_device *spi,
+				   struct spi_transfer *xfer)
+{
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
+	u32 val;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(master, spi, xfer);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&master->dev, "failed to setup chip for transfer\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	master->cur_msg->state = xfer;
+	espi->rx = 0;
+	espi->tx = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * There is no point of setting up DMA for the transfers which will
+	 * fit into the FIFO and can be transferred with a single interrupt.
+	 * So in these cases we will be using PIO and don't bother for DMA.
+	 */
+	if (espi->dma_rx && xfer->len > SPI_FIFO_SIZE)
+		return ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(master);
+
+	/* Using PIO so prime the TX FIFO and enable interrupts */
+	ep93xx_spi_read_write(master);
+
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val |= (SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+
+	/* signal that we need to wait for completion */
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static int ep93xx_spi_prepare_message(struct spi_master *master,
+				      struct spi_message *msg)
+{
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
+	unsigned long timeout;
+
+	/*
+	 * Just to be sure: flush any data from RX FIFO.
+	 */
+	timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(SPI_TIMEOUT);
+	while (readl(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE) {
+		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
+			dev_warn(&master->dev,
+				 "timeout while flushing RX FIFO\n");
+			return -ETIMEDOUT;
+		}
+		readl(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * We explicitly handle FIFO level. This way we don't have to check TX
+	 * FIFO status using %SSPSR_TNF bit which may cause RX FIFO overruns.
+	 */
+	espi->fifo_level = 0;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int ep93xx_spi_prepare_hardware(struct spi_master *master)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
@@ -769,7 +664,8 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	master->prepare_transfer_hardware = ep93xx_spi_prepare_hardware;
 	master->unprepare_transfer_hardware = ep93xx_spi_unprepare_hardware;
-	master->transfer_one_message = ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message;
+	master->prepare_message = ep93xx_spi_prepare_message;
+	master->transfer_one = ep93xx_spi_transfer_one;
 	master->bus_num = pdev->id;
 	master->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA | SPI_CS_HIGH;
 	master->bits_per_word_mask = SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(4, 16);
@@ -810,8 +706,6 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto fail_release_master;
 	}
 
-	init_completion(&espi->wait);
-
 	/*
 	 * Calculate maximum and minimum supported clock rates
 	 * for the controller.
-- 
2.13.0

Applied "spi: spi-ep93xx: use the default master transfer queueing mechanism" to the spi tree

[Mark Brown]

The patch

   spi: spi-ep93xx: use the default master transfer queueing mechanism

has been applied to the spi tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From d9a017713d909697f528a3f6569d5deb7477cea1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 08:51:31 +1200
Subject: [PATCH] spi: spi-ep93xx: use the default master transfer queueing
 mechanism

Update this driver to the default implementation of transfer_one_message().

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 322 ++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
 1 file changed, 108 insertions(+), 214 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
index cf7d8175bf79..e5cc07357746 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
@@ -73,7 +73,6 @@
  * @clk: clock for the controller
  * @mmio: pointer to ioremap()'d registers
  * @sspdr_phys: physical address of the SSPDR register
- * @wait: wait here until given transfer is completed
  * @tx: current byte in transfer to transmit
  * @rx: current byte in transfer to receive
  * @fifo_level: how full is FIFO (%0..%SPI_FIFO_SIZE - %1). Receiving one
@@ -91,7 +90,6 @@ struct ep93xx_spi {
 	struct clk			*clk;
 	void __iomem			*mmio;
 	unsigned long			sspdr_phys;
-	struct completion		wait;
 	size_t				tx;
 	size_t				rx;
 	size_t				fifo_level;
@@ -123,8 +121,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_calc_divisors(struct spi_master *master,
 
 	/*
 	 * Make sure that max value is between values supported by the
-	 * controller. Note that minimum value is already checked in
-	 * ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message().
+	 * controller.
 	 */
 	rate = clamp(rate, master->min_speed_hz, master->max_speed_hz);
 
@@ -149,15 +146,6 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_calc_divisors(struct spi_master *master,
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
-static void ep93xx_spi_cs_control(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable)
-{
-	if (spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH)
-		enable = !enable;
-
-	if (gpio_is_valid(spi->cs_gpio))
-		gpio_set_value(spi->cs_gpio, !enable);
-}
-
 static int ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(struct spi_master *master,
 				 struct spi_device *spi,
 				 struct spi_transfer *xfer)
@@ -188,34 +176,38 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(struct spi_master *master,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void ep93xx_do_write(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)
+static void ep93xx_do_write(struct spi_master *master)
 {
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
+	struct spi_transfer *xfer = master->cur_msg->state;
 	u32 val = 0;
 
-	if (t->bits_per_word > 8) {
-		if (t->tx_buf)
-			val = ((u16 *)t->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
+	if (xfer->bits_per_word > 8) {
+		if (xfer->tx_buf)
+			val = ((u16 *)xfer->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
 		espi->tx += 2;
 	} else {
-		if (t->tx_buf)
-			val = ((u8 *)t->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
+		if (xfer->tx_buf)
+			val = ((u8 *)xfer->tx_buf)[espi->tx];
 		espi->tx += 1;
 	}
 	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPDR);
 }
 
-static void ep93xx_do_read(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)
+static void ep93xx_do_read(struct spi_master *master)
 {
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
+	struct spi_transfer *xfer = master->cur_msg->state;
 	u32 val;
 
 	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
-	if (t->bits_per_word > 8) {
-		if (t->rx_buf)
-			((u16 *)t->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = val;
+	if (xfer->bits_per_word > 8) {
+		if (xfer->rx_buf)
+			((u16 *)xfer->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = val;
 		espi->rx += 2;
 	} else {
-		if (t->rx_buf)
-			((u8 *)t->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = val;
+		if (xfer->rx_buf)
+			((u8 *)xfer->rx_buf)[espi->rx] = val;
 		espi->rx += 1;
 	}
 }
@@ -234,45 +226,26 @@ static void ep93xx_do_read(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)
 static int ep93xx_spi_read_write(struct spi_master *master)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
-	struct spi_transfer *t = master->cur_msg->state;
+	struct spi_transfer *xfer = master->cur_msg->state;
 
 	/* read as long as RX FIFO has frames in it */
 	while ((readl(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE)) {
-		ep93xx_do_read(espi, t);
+		ep93xx_do_read(master);
 		espi->fifo_level--;
 	}
 
 	/* write as long as TX FIFO has room */
-	while (espi->fifo_level < SPI_FIFO_SIZE && espi->tx < t->len) {
-		ep93xx_do_write(espi, t);
+	while (espi->fifo_level < SPI_FIFO_SIZE && espi->tx < xfer->len) {
+		ep93xx_do_write(master);
 		espi->fifo_level++;
 	}
 
-	if (espi->rx == t->len)
+	if (espi->rx == xfer->len)
 		return 0;
 
 	return -EINPROGRESS;
 }
 
-static void ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(struct spi_master *master)
-{
-	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
-
-	/*
-	 * Now everything is set up for the current transfer. We prime the TX
-	 * FIFO, enable interrupts, and wait for the transfer to complete.
-	 */
-	if (ep93xx_spi_read_write(master)) {
-		u32 val;
-
-		val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-		val |= (SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
-		writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
-
-		wait_for_completion(&espi->wait);
-	}
-}
-
 /**
  * ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare() - prepares a DMA transfer
  * @master: SPI master
@@ -287,7 +260,7 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct spi_master *master,
 		       enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
-	struct spi_transfer *t = master->cur_msg->state;
+	struct spi_transfer *xfer = master->cur_msg->state;
 	struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *txd;
 	enum dma_slave_buswidth buswidth;
 	struct dma_slave_config conf;
@@ -295,10 +268,10 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct spi_master *master,
 	struct sg_table *sgt;
 	struct dma_chan *chan;
 	const void *buf, *pbuf;
-	size_t len = t->len;
+	size_t len = xfer->len;
 	int i, ret, nents;
 
-	if (t->bits_per_word > 8)
+	if (xfer->bits_per_word > 8)
 		buswidth = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES;
 	else
 		buswidth = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE;
@@ -308,14 +281,14 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct spi_master *master,
 
 	if (dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) {
 		chan = espi->dma_rx;
-		buf = t->rx_buf;
+		buf = xfer->rx_buf;
 		sgt = &espi->rx_sgt;
 
 		conf.src_addr = espi->sspdr_phys;
 		conf.src_addr_width = buswidth;
 	} else {
 		chan = espi->dma_tx;
-		buf = t->tx_buf;
+		buf = xfer->tx_buf;
 		sgt = &espi->tx_sgt;
 
 		conf.dst_addr = espi->sspdr_phys;
@@ -406,10 +379,15 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(struct spi_master *master,
 
 static void ep93xx_spi_dma_callback(void *callback_param)
 {
-	complete(callback_param);
+	struct spi_master *master = callback_param;
+
+	ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
+	ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
+
+	spi_finalize_current_transfer(master);
 }
 
-static void ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct spi_master *master)
+static int ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct spi_master *master)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 	struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *rxd, *txd;
@@ -417,177 +395,29 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct spi_master *master)
 	rxd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(master, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
 	if (IS_ERR(rxd)) {
 		dev_err(&master->dev, "DMA RX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(rxd));
-		master->cur_msg->status = PTR_ERR(rxd);
-		return;
+		return PTR_ERR(rxd);
 	}
 
 	txd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(master, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
 	if (IS_ERR(txd)) {
 		ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
 		dev_err(&master->dev, "DMA TX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(txd));
-		master->cur_msg->status = PTR_ERR(txd);
-		return;
+		return PTR_ERR(txd);
 	}
 
 	/* We are ready when RX is done */
 	rxd->callback = ep93xx_spi_dma_callback;
-	rxd->callback_param = &espi->wait;
+	rxd->callback_param = master;
 
-	/* Now submit both descriptors and wait while they finish */
+	/* Now submit both descriptors and start DMA */
 	dmaengine_submit(rxd);
 	dmaengine_submit(txd);
 
 	dma_async_issue_pending(espi->dma_rx);
 	dma_async_issue_pending(espi->dma_tx);
 
-	wait_for_completion(&espi->wait);
-
-	ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
-	ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
-}
-
-/**
- * ep93xx_spi_process_transfer() - processes one SPI transfer
- * @master: SPI master
- * @msg: current message
- * @t: transfer to process
- *
- * This function processes one SPI transfer given in @t. Function waits until
- * transfer is complete (may sleep) and updates @msg->status based on whether
- * transfer was successfully processed or not.
- */
-static void ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(struct spi_master *master,
-					struct spi_message *msg,
-					struct spi_transfer *t)
-{
-	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
-	int err;
-
-	msg->state = t;
-
-	err = ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(master, msg->spi, t);
-	if (err) {
-		dev_err(&master->dev,
-			"failed to setup chip for transfer\n");
-		msg->status = err;
-		return;
-	}
-
-	espi->rx = 0;
-	espi->tx = 0;
-
-	/*
-	 * There is no point of setting up DMA for the transfers which will
-	 * fit into the FIFO and can be transferred with a single interrupt.
-	 * So in these cases we will be using PIO and don't bother for DMA.
-	 */
-	if (espi->dma_rx && t->len > SPI_FIFO_SIZE)
-		ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(master);
-	else
-		ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(master);
-
-	/*
-	 * In case of error during transmit, we bail out from processing
-	 * the message.
-	 */
-	if (msg->status)
-		return;
-
-	msg->actual_length += t->len;
-
-	/*
-	 * After this transfer is finished, perform any possible
-	 * post-transfer actions requested by the protocol driver.
-	 */
-	if (t->delay_usecs) {
-		set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-		schedule_timeout(usecs_to_jiffies(t->delay_usecs));
-	}
-	if (t->cs_change) {
-		if (!list_is_last(&t->transfer_list, &msg->transfers)) {
-			/*
-			 * In case protocol driver is asking us to drop the
-			 * chipselect briefly, we let the scheduler to handle
-			 * any "delay" here.
-			 */
-			ep93xx_spi_cs_control(msg->spi, false);
-			cond_resched();
-			ep93xx_spi_cs_control(msg->spi, true);
-		}
-	}
-}
-
-/*
- * ep93xx_spi_process_message() - process one SPI message
- * @master: SPI master
- * @msg: message to process
- *
- * This function processes a single SPI message. We go through all transfers in
- * the message and pass them to ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(). Chipselect is
- * asserted during the whole message (unless per transfer cs_change is set).
- *
- * @msg->status contains %0 in case of success or negative error code in case of
- * failure.
- */
-static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct spi_master *master,
-				       struct spi_message *msg)
-{
-	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
-	unsigned long timeout;
-	struct spi_transfer *t;
-
-	/*
-	 * Just to be sure: flush any data from RX FIFO.
-	 */
-	timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(SPI_TIMEOUT);
-	while (readl(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE) {
-		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
-			dev_warn(&master->dev,
-				 "timeout while flushing RX FIFO\n");
-			msg->status = -ETIMEDOUT;
-			return;
-		}
-		readl(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * We explicitly handle FIFO level. This way we don't have to check TX
-	 * FIFO status using %SSPSR_TNF bit which may cause RX FIFO overruns.
-	 */
-	espi->fifo_level = 0;
-
-	/*
-	 * Assert the chipselect.
-	 */
-	ep93xx_spi_cs_control(msg->spi, true);
-
-	list_for_each_entry(t, &msg->transfers, transfer_list) {
-		ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(master, msg, t);
-		if (msg->status)
-			break;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Now the whole message is transferred (or failed for some reason). We
-	 * deselect the device and disable the SPI controller.
-	 */
-	ep93xx_spi_cs_control(msg->spi, false);
-}
-
-static int ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
-					   struct spi_message *msg)
-{
-	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
-
-	msg->state = NULL;
-	msg->status = 0;
-	msg->actual_length = 0;
-
-	ep93xx_spi_process_message(master, msg);
-
-	spi_finalize_current_message(master);
-
-	return 0;
+	/* signal that we need to wait for completion */
+	return 1;
 }
 
 static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
@@ -630,11 +460,76 @@ static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	val &= ~(SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
 	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
 
-	complete(&espi->wait);
+	spi_finalize_current_transfer(master);
 
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
+static int ep93xx_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master,
+				   struct spi_device *spi,
+				   struct spi_transfer *xfer)
+{
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
+	u32 val;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(master, spi, xfer);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&master->dev, "failed to setup chip for transfer\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	master->cur_msg->state = xfer;
+	espi->rx = 0;
+	espi->tx = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * There is no point of setting up DMA for the transfers which will
+	 * fit into the FIFO and can be transferred with a single interrupt.
+	 * So in these cases we will be using PIO and don't bother for DMA.
+	 */
+	if (espi->dma_rx && xfer->len > SPI_FIFO_SIZE)
+		return ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(master);
+
+	/* Using PIO so prime the TX FIFO and enable interrupts */
+	ep93xx_spi_read_write(master);
+
+	val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+	val |= (SSPCR1_RORIE | SSPCR1_TIE | SSPCR1_RIE);
+	writel(val, espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
+
+	/* signal that we need to wait for completion */
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static int ep93xx_spi_prepare_message(struct spi_master *master,
+				      struct spi_message *msg)
+{
+	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
+	unsigned long timeout;
+
+	/*
+	 * Just to be sure: flush any data from RX FIFO.
+	 */
+	timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(SPI_TIMEOUT);
+	while (readl(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE) {
+		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
+			dev_warn(&master->dev,
+				 "timeout while flushing RX FIFO\n");
+			return -ETIMEDOUT;
+		}
+		readl(espi->mmio + SSPDR);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * We explicitly handle FIFO level. This way we don't have to check TX
+	 * FIFO status using %SSPSR_TNF bit which may cause RX FIFO overruns.
+	 */
+	espi->fifo_level = 0;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int ep93xx_spi_prepare_hardware(struct spi_master *master)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
@@ -769,7 +664,8 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	master->prepare_transfer_hardware = ep93xx_spi_prepare_hardware;
 	master->unprepare_transfer_hardware = ep93xx_spi_unprepare_hardware;
-	master->transfer_one_message = ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message;
+	master->prepare_message = ep93xx_spi_prepare_message;
+	master->transfer_one = ep93xx_spi_transfer_one;
 	master->bus_num = pdev->id;
 	master->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA | SPI_CS_HIGH;
 	master->bits_per_word_mask = SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(4, 16);
@@ -810,8 +706,6 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto fail_release_master;
 	}
 
-	init_completion(&espi->wait);
-
 	/*
 	 * Calculate maximum and minimum supported clock rates
 	 * for the controller.
-- 
2.13.3