From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 08:04:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X6o7euVw0QlysIPV@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201109213023.15092-6-will@kernel.org>
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 09:30:21PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> Since 32-bit applications will be killed if they are caught trying to
> execute on a 64-bit-only CPU in a mismatched system, advertise the set
> of 32-bit capable CPUs to userspace in sysfs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> ---
> .../ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 9 +++++++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
I still think the "kill processes that can not run on this CPU" is crazy
but that has nothing to do with this sysfs file patch, which looks good
to me:
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 08:04:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X6o7euVw0QlysIPV@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201109213023.15092-6-will@kernel.org>
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 09:30:21PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> Since 32-bit applications will be killed if they are caught trying to
> execute on a 64-bit-only CPU in a mismatched system, advertise the set
> of 32-bit capable CPUs to userspace in sysfs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> ---
> .../ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 9 +++++++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
I still think the "kill processes that can not run on this CPU" is crazy
but that has nothing to do with this sysfs file patch, which looks good
to me:
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-10 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-09 21:30 [PATCH v2 0/6] An alternative series for asymmetric AArch32 systems Will Deacon
2020-11-09 21:30 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-09 21:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] arm64: cpuinfo: Split AArch32 registers out into a separate struct Will Deacon
2020-11-09 21:30 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-09 21:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support Will Deacon
2020-11-09 21:30 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-11 19:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-11 19:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-13 9:36 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-13 9:36 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-13 10:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-13 10:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-09 21:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: arm64: Kill 32-bit vCPUs on systems with mismatched " Will Deacon
2020-11-09 21:30 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-10 9:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-10 9:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-09 21:30 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs Will Deacon
2020-11-09 21:30 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-09 21:30 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs Will Deacon
2020-11-09 21:30 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-10 7:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2020-11-10 7:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-11-10 9:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-10 9:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-10 9:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-11-10 9:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-11-10 9:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-10 9:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-10 10:10 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-11-10 10:10 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-11-10 10:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-10 10:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-10 10:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-10 10:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-09 21:30 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] arm64: Hook up cmdline parameter to allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon
2020-11-09 21:30 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X6o7euVw0QlysIPV@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.