* Re: [PATCH] tty: fix timeout equals to 0 problem in tty_ioctl
[not found] <1608348451-24082-1-git-send-email-zhangqiumiao1@huwei.com>
@ 2020-12-19 7:50 ` Greg KH
2021-01-07 15:28 ` Greg KH
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2020-12-19 7:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zhangqiumiao1; +Cc: jirislaby, linux-kernel, zhangqiumiao
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 11:27:31AM +0800, zhangqiumiao1@huwei.com wrote:
> From: zhangqiumiao <zhangqiumiao1@huawei.com>
>
> Fix the problem that tty buffer data was not flushed when timeout=0.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhangqiumiao <zhangqiumiao1@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c
> index 4de1c6ddb8ff..f9d4b6e22308 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c
> @@ -220,13 +220,21 @@ void tty_wait_until_sent(struct tty_struct *tty, long timeout)
> tty_debug_wait_until_sent(tty, "wait until sent, timeout=%ld\n", timeout);
>
> if (!timeout)
> - timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
> + timeout = 60 * HZ;
Why change this?
>
> timeout = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(tty->write_wait,
> !tty_chars_in_buffer(tty), timeout);
> - if (timeout <= 0)
> + if (timeout < 0)
> return;
How can timeout be 0 here?
> + if (timeout == 0) {
> + if (tty->ops->flush_buffer) {
> + pr_info("%s: flush buffer\n", __func__);
Debugging code?
> + tty->ops->flush_buffer(tty);
> + }
> + return;
> + }
> +
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tty: fix timeout equals to 0 problem in tty_ioctl
[not found] <1608348451-24082-1-git-send-email-zhangqiumiao1@huwei.com>
2020-12-19 7:50 ` [PATCH] tty: fix timeout equals to 0 problem in tty_ioctl Greg KH
@ 2021-01-07 15:28 ` Greg KH
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2021-01-07 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zhangqiumiao1; +Cc: jirislaby, linux-kernel, zhangqiumiao
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 11:27:31AM +0800, zhangqiumiao1@huwei.com wrote:
> From: zhangqiumiao <zhangqiumiao1@huawei.com>
>
> Fix the problem that tty buffer data was not flushed when timeout=0.
How can that happen? We need a lot better changelog text here please.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhangqiumiao <zhangqiumiao1@huawei.com>
I need a "full" name here, please.
> ---
> drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c
> index 4de1c6ddb8ff..f9d4b6e22308 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c
> @@ -220,13 +220,21 @@ void tty_wait_until_sent(struct tty_struct *tty, long timeout)
> tty_debug_wait_until_sent(tty, "wait until sent, timeout=%ld\n", timeout);
>
> if (!timeout)
> - timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
> + timeout = 60 * HZ;
Why pick this random number?
>
> timeout = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(tty->write_wait,
> !tty_chars_in_buffer(tty), timeout);
> - if (timeout <= 0)
> + if (timeout < 0)
> return;
>
> + if (timeout == 0) {
> + if (tty->ops->flush_buffer) {
> + pr_info("%s: flush buffer\n", __func__);
Debugging code needs to be removed.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-07 15:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1608348451-24082-1-git-send-email-zhangqiumiao1@huwei.com>
2020-12-19 7:50 ` [PATCH] tty: fix timeout equals to 0 problem in tty_ioctl Greg KH
2021-01-07 15:28 ` Greg KH
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.