From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: "Android Kernel Team" <kernel-team@android.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
<linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>,
"Hridya Valsaraju" <hridya@google.com>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
<linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmabuf: Add the capability to expose DMA-BUF stats in sysfs
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:07:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X9IPhEkcZO+Ut5RH@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uFD3fE01Li3JOpHpzP7313OT3xpcjBwzSVjrCGAmab2Zg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 12:26:01PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:55 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:27:27AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:10:45AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:58:50AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> > > > > In general a good idea, but I have a few concern/comments here.
> > > > >
> > > > > Am 10.12.20 um 05:43 schrieb Hridya Valsaraju:
> > > > > > This patch allows statistics to be enabled for each DMA-BUF in
> > > > > > sysfs by enabling the config CONFIG_DMABUF_SYSFS_STATS.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The following stats will be exposed by the interface:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /sys/kernel/dmabuf/<inode_number>/exporter_name
> > > > > > /sys/kernel/dmabuf/<inode_number>/size
> > > > > > /sys/kernel/dmabuf/<inode_number>/dev_map_info
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The inode_number is unique for each DMA-BUF and was added earlier [1]
> > > > > > in order to allow userspace to track DMA-BUF usage across different
> > > > > > processes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Currently, this information is exposed in
> > > > > > /sys/kernel/debug/dma_buf/bufinfo.
> > > > > > However, since debugfs is considered unsafe to be mounted in production,
> > > > > > it is being duplicated in sysfs.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mhm, this makes it part of the UAPI. What is the justification for this?
> > > > >
> > > > > In other words do we really need those debug information in a production
> > > > > environment?
> > > >
> > > > Production environments seem to want to know who is using up memory :)
> > >
> > > This only shows shared memory, so it does smell a lot like $specific_issue
> > > and we're designing a narrow solution for that and then have to carry it
> > > forever.
> >
> > I think the "issue" is that this was a feature from ion that people
> > "missed" in the dmabuf move. Taking away the ability to see what kind
> > of allocations were being made didn't make a lot of debugging tools
> > happy :(
>
> If this is just for dma-heaps then why don't we add the stuff back
> over there? It reinforces more that the android gpu stack and the
> non-android gpu stack on linux are fairly different in fundamental
> ways, but that's not really new.
Back "over where"?
dma-bufs are not only used for the graphics stack on android from what I
can tell, so this shouldn't be a gpu-specific issue.
confused,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
<linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>,
"Hridya Valsaraju" <hridya@google.com>,
"Android Kernel Team" <kernel-team@android.com>,
"open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
<linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmabuf: Add the capability to expose DMA-BUF stats in sysfs
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:07:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X9IPhEkcZO+Ut5RH@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uFD3fE01Li3JOpHpzP7313OT3xpcjBwzSVjrCGAmab2Zg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 12:26:01PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:55 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:27:27AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:10:45AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:58:50AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> > > > > In general a good idea, but I have a few concern/comments here.
> > > > >
> > > > > Am 10.12.20 um 05:43 schrieb Hridya Valsaraju:
> > > > > > This patch allows statistics to be enabled for each DMA-BUF in
> > > > > > sysfs by enabling the config CONFIG_DMABUF_SYSFS_STATS.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The following stats will be exposed by the interface:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /sys/kernel/dmabuf/<inode_number>/exporter_name
> > > > > > /sys/kernel/dmabuf/<inode_number>/size
> > > > > > /sys/kernel/dmabuf/<inode_number>/dev_map_info
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The inode_number is unique for each DMA-BUF and was added earlier [1]
> > > > > > in order to allow userspace to track DMA-BUF usage across different
> > > > > > processes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Currently, this information is exposed in
> > > > > > /sys/kernel/debug/dma_buf/bufinfo.
> > > > > > However, since debugfs is considered unsafe to be mounted in production,
> > > > > > it is being duplicated in sysfs.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mhm, this makes it part of the UAPI. What is the justification for this?
> > > > >
> > > > > In other words do we really need those debug information in a production
> > > > > environment?
> > > >
> > > > Production environments seem to want to know who is using up memory :)
> > >
> > > This only shows shared memory, so it does smell a lot like $specific_issue
> > > and we're designing a narrow solution for that and then have to carry it
> > > forever.
> >
> > I think the "issue" is that this was a feature from ion that people
> > "missed" in the dmabuf move. Taking away the ability to see what kind
> > of allocations were being made didn't make a lot of debugging tools
> > happy :(
>
> If this is just for dma-heaps then why don't we add the stuff back
> over there? It reinforces more that the android gpu stack and the
> non-android gpu stack on linux are fairly different in fundamental
> ways, but that's not really new.
Back "over where"?
dma-bufs are not only used for the graphics stack on android from what I
can tell, so this shouldn't be a gpu-specific issue.
confused,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-10 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-10 4:43 [PATCH] dmabuf: Add the capability to expose DMA-BUF stats in sysfs Hridya Valsaraju
2020-12-10 4:43 ` Hridya Valsaraju
2020-12-10 9:45 ` Greg KH
2020-12-10 9:45 ` Greg KH
2020-12-10 9:58 ` Christian König
2020-12-10 9:58 ` Christian König
2020-12-10 10:10 ` Greg KH
2020-12-10 10:10 ` Greg KH
2020-12-10 10:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-12-10 10:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-12-10 10:56 ` Greg KH
2020-12-10 10:56 ` Greg KH
2020-12-10 11:02 ` Christian König
2020-12-10 11:02 ` Christian König
2020-12-10 22:41 ` Hridya Valsaraju
2020-12-10 22:41 ` Hridya Valsaraju
2020-12-11 8:03 ` Christian König
2020-12-11 8:03 ` Christian König
2020-12-11 18:30 ` Hridya Valsaraju
2020-12-11 18:30 ` Hridya Valsaraju
2020-12-10 11:26 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-12-10 11:26 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-12-10 12:07 ` Greg KH [this message]
2020-12-10 12:07 ` Greg KH
2020-12-10 13:10 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-12-10 13:10 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-12-11 20:21 ` John Stultz
2020-12-11 20:21 ` John Stultz
2020-12-10 20:05 ` Hridya Valsaraju
2020-12-10 20:05 ` Hridya Valsaraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X9IPhEkcZO+Ut5RH@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hridya@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.