All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@google.com>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:REMOTE PROCESSOR \(REMOTEPROC\) SUBSYSTEM"
	<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc/mediatek: change MT8192 CFG register base
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:13:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <X9JzZKtgGYELamYe@builder.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+Px+wUqWh+_B6rQ1kyZRALF9r-HE8ZWpgt0c9B6doxRXLZ+9g@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu 10 Dec 11:09 CST 2020, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 1:02 AM Bjorn Andersson
> <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed 09 Dec 23:41 CST 2020, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> >
> > > The correct MT8192 CFG register base is 0x20000 off.  Changes the
> > > registers accordingly.
> > >
> > > Fixes: fd0b6c1ff85a ("remoteproc/mediatek: Add support for mt8192 SCP")
> > > Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@google.com>
> >
> > I presume there's an associated DT change with this?
> >
> > I'm okay with taking this, but would like to have Matthias ack on the
> > fact that we're breaking backwards compatibility with older DTS.
> >
> > (Or I could ack this and Matthias can take it together with the DT
> > change, to reduce the breakage gap in the git history?)
> 
> Yes, it has associated DT changes.  But the board "MT8192 SCP" is
> still under development, the DTS part hasn't been sent to upstream
> yet.
> 
> Thus, it won't break anyone else.

Then I don't mind merging this, will include it in v5.11.

Thank you,
Bjorn

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@google.com>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
	"open list:REMOTE PROCESSOR (REMOTEPROC) SUBSYSTEM" 
	<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc/mediatek: change MT8192 CFG register base
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:13:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <X9JzZKtgGYELamYe@builder.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+Px+wUqWh+_B6rQ1kyZRALF9r-HE8ZWpgt0c9B6doxRXLZ+9g@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu 10 Dec 11:09 CST 2020, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 1:02 AM Bjorn Andersson
> <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed 09 Dec 23:41 CST 2020, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> >
> > > The correct MT8192 CFG register base is 0x20000 off.  Changes the
> > > registers accordingly.
> > >
> > > Fixes: fd0b6c1ff85a ("remoteproc/mediatek: Add support for mt8192 SCP")
> > > Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@google.com>
> >
> > I presume there's an associated DT change with this?
> >
> > I'm okay with taking this, but would like to have Matthias ack on the
> > fact that we're breaking backwards compatibility with older DTS.
> >
> > (Or I could ack this and Matthias can take it together with the DT
> > change, to reduce the breakage gap in the git history?)
> 
> Yes, it has associated DT changes.  But the board "MT8192 SCP" is
> still under development, the DTS part hasn't been sent to upstream
> yet.
> 
> Thus, it won't break anyone else.

Then I don't mind merging this, will include it in v5.11.

Thank you,
Bjorn

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-10 19:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-10  5:41 [PATCH] remoteproc/mediatek: change MT8192 CFG register base Tzung-Bi Shih
2020-12-10  5:41 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2020-12-10 17:02 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-12-10 17:02   ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-12-10 17:09   ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2020-12-10 17:09     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2020-12-10 19:13     ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2020-12-10 19:13       ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-12-10 22:30 ` patchwork-bot+linux-remoteproc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=X9JzZKtgGYELamYe@builder.lan \
    --to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    --cc=tzungbi@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.