All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] NetLabel: Allow passing the LSM domain as a shared pointer
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:06:04 +1000 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Xine.LNX.4.64.0804110805370.1313@us.intercode.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080409205039.26774.50884.stgit@flek.lan>

On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Paul Moore wrote:

> Smack doesn't have the need to create a private copy of the LSM "domain" when
> setting NetLabel security attributes like SELinux, however, the current
> NetLabel code requires a private copy of the LSM "domain".  This patches fixes
> that by letting the LSM determine how it wants to pass the domain value.
> 
>  * NETLBL_SECATTR_DOMAIN_CPY
>    The current behavior, NetLabel assumes that the domain value is a copy and
>    frees it when done
> 
>  * NETLBL_SECATTR_DOMAIN
>    New, Smack-friendly behavior, NetLabel assumes that the domain value is a
>    reference to a string managed by the LSM and does not free it when done
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>

Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] NetLabel: Allow passing the LSM domain as a shared pointer
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:06:04 +1000 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Xine.LNX.4.64.0804110805370.1313@us.intercode.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080409205039.26774.50884.stgit@flek.lan>

On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Paul Moore wrote:

> Smack doesn't have the need to create a private copy of the LSM "domain" when
> setting NetLabel security attributes like SELinux, however, the current
> NetLabel code requires a private copy of the LSM "domain".  This patches fixes
> that by letting the LSM determine how it wants to pass the domain value.
> 
>  * NETLBL_SECATTR_DOMAIN_CPY
>    The current behavior, NetLabel assumes that the domain value is a copy and
>    frees it when done
> 
>  * NETLBL_SECATTR_DOMAIN
>    New, Smack-friendly behavior, NetLabel assumes that the domain value is a
>    reference to a string managed by the LSM and does not free it when done
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>

Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-10 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-09 20:50 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Labeled networking patches for 2.6.26 Paul Moore
2008-04-09 20:50 ` Paul Moore
2008-04-09 20:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] NetLabel: Allow passing the LSM domain as a shared pointer Paul Moore
2008-04-09 20:50   ` Paul Moore
2008-04-10 22:06   ` James Morris [this message]
2008-04-10 22:06     ` James Morris
2008-04-09 20:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] LSM: Make the Labeled IPsec hooks more stack friendly Paul Moore
2008-04-09 20:50   ` Paul Moore
2008-04-10 22:08   ` James Morris
2008-04-10 22:08     ` James Morris
2008-04-10 21:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Labeled networking patches for 2.6.26 Paul Moore
2008-04-10 21:25   ` Paul Moore
2008-04-10 22:04   ` James Morris
2008-04-10 22:04     ` James Morris
2008-04-10 22:12     ` Paul Moore
2008-04-10 22:12       ` Paul Moore
2008-04-10 22:47       ` David Miller
2008-04-13  2:18       ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Xine.LNX.4.64.0804110805370.1313@us.intercode.com.au \
    --to=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.moore@hp.com \
    --cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.