From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@intel.com>,
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 09/11] drm/xe/guc_pc: Move gt register to the proper place
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 15:23:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+/iLu7iKuC1jMDb@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230217005226.106499-10-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 04:52:24PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> Move a few defines from xe_guc_pc.c to the right register, now that
> there is one: xe_gt_regs.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c | 6 ------
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
> index da40133252fb..ab8c9e51f62e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
> @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@
> #define DFR_DISABLE (1 << 9)
>
> #define GEN6_RPNSWREQ _MMIO(0xa008)
> +#define REQ_RATIO_MASK REG_GENMASK(31, 23)
> #define GEN6_RC_CONTROL _MMIO(0xa090)
> #define GEN6_RC_STATE _MMIO(0xa094)
>
> @@ -242,6 +243,7 @@
> #define FORCEWAKE_KERNEL_FALLBACK BIT(15)
>
> #define GEN6_GT_CORE_STATUS _MMIO(0x138060)
> +#define RCN_MASK REG_GENMASK(2, 0)
> #define GEN6_RC0 0
> #define GEN6_RC6 3
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> index 0df82defa7e4..3465236b0b49 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> @@ -30,12 +30,6 @@
> #define GEN10_FREQ_INFO_REC _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5ef0)
> #define RPE_MASK REG_GENMASK(15, 8)
I don't like this getting split from the rest... but I don't have
any quick better recommendation and the movement below at least is correct
by itself. So,
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>
> -/* For GEN6_RPNSWREQ.reg to be merged when the definition moves to Xe */
> -#define REQ_RATIO_MASK REG_GENMASK(31, 23)
> -
> -/* For GEN6_GT_CORE_STATUS.reg to be merged when the definition moves to Xe */
> -#define RCN_MASK REG_GENMASK(2, 0)
> -
> #define GEN12_RPSTAT1 _MMIO(0x1381b4)
> #define GEN12_CAGF_MASK REG_GENMASK(19, 11)
>
> --
> 2.39.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-17 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-17 0:52 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 00/11] Start register cleanup Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-17 0:52 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 01/11] drm/xe: Remove outdated build workaround Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-17 20:13 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-02-17 0:52 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 02/11] drm/xe: Sort includes Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-17 11:20 ` Matthew Auld
2023-02-17 15:03 ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-17 11:39 ` Jani Nikula
2023-02-17 15:09 ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-17 0:52 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 03/11] drm/xe/guc: Remove i915_regs.h include Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-17 0:52 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 04/11] drm/xe: Remove dependency on intel_engine_regs.h Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-24 18:02 ` Matt Roper
2023-02-24 18:05 ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-17 0:52 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 05/11] drm/xe: Remove dependency on intel_gt_regs.h Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-17 20:20 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-02-17 22:08 ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-24 18:06 ` Matt Roper
2023-02-24 18:29 ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-24 18:34 ` Matt Roper
2023-02-24 19:47 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2023-02-24 20:25 ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-24 21:22 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2023-02-17 0:52 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 06/11] drm/xe: Remove dependency on intel_lrc_reg.h Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-24 18:20 ` Matt Roper
2023-02-24 18:54 ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-17 0:52 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 07/11] drm/xe: Remove dependency on intel_gpu_commands.h Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-24 18:26 ` Matt Roper
2023-02-17 0:52 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 08/11] drm/xe: Remove dependency on i915_reg.h Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-17 20:27 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-02-17 22:22 ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-27 14:19 ` Jani Nikula
2023-02-17 0:52 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 09/11] drm/xe/guc_pc: Move gt register to the proper place Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-17 20:23 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-02-17 22:11 ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-17 0:52 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 10/11] drm/xe: Remove dependency on intel_mchbar_regs.h Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-17 20:18 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-02-17 0:52 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 11/11] drm/xe: Use relative includes for i915_reg_defs.h Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-17 16:33 ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-17 20:28 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-02-17 22:30 ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-21 21:42 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-02-21 21:50 ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-02-17 6:19 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 00/11] Start register cleanup Lucas De Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y+/iLu7iKuC1jMDb@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.