All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>,
	Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/24] clocksource/timer-riscv: Refactor riscv_timer_init_dt()
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 20:54:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+Vdc09bWb9CTXyt@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230130182225.2471414-16-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4481 bytes --]

Hey Sunil,

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:52:16PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> Refactor the timer init function such that few things can be shared by
> both DT and ACPI based platforms.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>

What did Anup do here? He's not author or co-author, so the SoB chain
looks incorrect.

> Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c | 79 +++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
> index 1b4b36df5484..4016c065a01c 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
> @@ -119,61 +119,28 @@ static irqreturn_t riscv_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> -static int __init riscv_timer_init_dt(struct device_node *n)
> +static int __init riscv_timer_init_common(void)
>  {
> -	int cpuid, error;
> -	unsigned long hartid;
> -	struct device_node *child;
> -	struct irq_domain *domain;
> -
> -	error = riscv_of_processor_hartid(n, &hartid);
> -	if (error < 0) {
> -		pr_warn("Not valid hartid for node [%pOF] error = [%lu]\n",
> -			n, hartid);
> -		return error;
> -	}
> -
> -	cpuid = riscv_hartid_to_cpuid(hartid);
> -	if (cpuid < 0) {
> -		pr_warn("Invalid cpuid for hartid [%lu]\n", hartid);
> -		return cpuid;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (cpuid != smp_processor_id())
> -		return 0;
> +	int error;
> +	struct fwnode_handle *intc_fwnode = riscv_get_intc_hwnode();
> +	struct irq_domain *domain = NULL;
>  
> -	child = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "riscv,timer");
> -	if (child) {
> -		riscv_timer_cannot_wake_cpu = of_property_read_bool(child,
> -					"riscv,timer-cannot-wake-cpu");
> -		of_node_put(child);
> -	}

Uhh, where did this code go?
Unless I've badly missed something, this has vanished in the patch.

>  
> -	domain = NULL;
> -	child = of_get_compatible_child(n, "riscv,cpu-intc");
> -	if (!child) {
> -		pr_err("Failed to find INTC node [%pOF]\n", n);
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -	}
> -	domain = irq_find_host(child);
> -	of_node_put(child);
> +	domain = irq_find_matching_fwnode(intc_fwnode, DOMAIN_BUS_ANY);
>  	if (!domain) {
> -		pr_err("Failed to find IRQ domain for node [%pOF]\n", n);
> +		pr_err("Failed to find INTC node [%pfwP]\n", intc_fwnode);
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>  
>  	riscv_clock_event_irq = irq_create_mapping(domain, RV_IRQ_TIMER);
>  	if (!riscv_clock_event_irq) {
> -		pr_err("Failed to map timer interrupt for node [%pOF]\n", n);
> -		return -ENODEV;
> +		pr_err("Failed to map timer interrupt for node [%pfwP]\n",
> +			intc_fwnode);
>  	}
>  
> -	pr_info("%s: Registering clocksource cpuid [%d] hartid [%lu]\n",
> -	       __func__, cpuid, hartid);
>  	error = clocksource_register_hz(&riscv_clocksource, riscv_timebase);
>  	if (error) {
> -		pr_err("RISCV timer register failed [%d] for cpu = [%d]\n",
> -		       error, cpuid);
> +		pr_err("clocksource register failed [%d]\n", error);

If you're changing this, s/register/registration/ to be grammatically
correct I suppose.

>  		return error;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -199,7 +166,35 @@ static int __init riscv_timer_init_dt(struct device_node *n)
>  		static_branch_enable(&riscv_sstc_available);
>  	}
>  
> +	pr_info("timer registered using %s\n",
> +		(static_branch_likely(&riscv_sstc_available)) ?
> +		"RISC-V Sstc" : "RISC-V SBI");

Why is this needed? Isn't there a print like 3 lines above here that
says "Timer interrupt in S-mode is available via sstc extension"?

> +
>  	return error;
>  }
>  
> +static int __init riscv_timer_init_dt(struct device_node *n)
> +{
> +	int cpuid, error;
> +	unsigned long hartid;
> +
> +	error = riscv_of_processor_hartid(n, &hartid);
> +	if (error < 0) {
> +		pr_warn("Not valid hartid for node [%pOF] error = [%lu]\n",

While you're already moving this, may as well fix the grammar IMO.
s/Not valid/Invalid/

Cheers,
Conor.

> +			n, hartid);
> +		return error;
> +	}
> +
> +	cpuid = riscv_hartid_to_cpuid(hartid);
> +	if (cpuid < 0) {
> +		pr_warn("Invalid cpuid for hartid [%lu]\n", hartid);
> +		return cpuid;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (cpuid != smp_processor_id())
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return riscv_timer_init_common();
> +}
> +
>  TIMER_OF_DECLARE(riscv_timer, "riscv", riscv_timer_init_dt);
> -- 
> 2.38.0
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>,
	Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/24] clocksource/timer-riscv: Refactor riscv_timer_init_dt()
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 20:54:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+Vdc09bWb9CTXyt@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230130182225.2471414-16-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4481 bytes --]

Hey Sunil,

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:52:16PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> Refactor the timer init function such that few things can be shared by
> both DT and ACPI based platforms.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>

What did Anup do here? He's not author or co-author, so the SoB chain
looks incorrect.

> Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c | 79 +++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
> index 1b4b36df5484..4016c065a01c 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
> @@ -119,61 +119,28 @@ static irqreturn_t riscv_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> -static int __init riscv_timer_init_dt(struct device_node *n)
> +static int __init riscv_timer_init_common(void)
>  {
> -	int cpuid, error;
> -	unsigned long hartid;
> -	struct device_node *child;
> -	struct irq_domain *domain;
> -
> -	error = riscv_of_processor_hartid(n, &hartid);
> -	if (error < 0) {
> -		pr_warn("Not valid hartid for node [%pOF] error = [%lu]\n",
> -			n, hartid);
> -		return error;
> -	}
> -
> -	cpuid = riscv_hartid_to_cpuid(hartid);
> -	if (cpuid < 0) {
> -		pr_warn("Invalid cpuid for hartid [%lu]\n", hartid);
> -		return cpuid;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (cpuid != smp_processor_id())
> -		return 0;
> +	int error;
> +	struct fwnode_handle *intc_fwnode = riscv_get_intc_hwnode();
> +	struct irq_domain *domain = NULL;
>  
> -	child = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "riscv,timer");
> -	if (child) {
> -		riscv_timer_cannot_wake_cpu = of_property_read_bool(child,
> -					"riscv,timer-cannot-wake-cpu");
> -		of_node_put(child);
> -	}

Uhh, where did this code go?
Unless I've badly missed something, this has vanished in the patch.

>  
> -	domain = NULL;
> -	child = of_get_compatible_child(n, "riscv,cpu-intc");
> -	if (!child) {
> -		pr_err("Failed to find INTC node [%pOF]\n", n);
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -	}
> -	domain = irq_find_host(child);
> -	of_node_put(child);
> +	domain = irq_find_matching_fwnode(intc_fwnode, DOMAIN_BUS_ANY);
>  	if (!domain) {
> -		pr_err("Failed to find IRQ domain for node [%pOF]\n", n);
> +		pr_err("Failed to find INTC node [%pfwP]\n", intc_fwnode);
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>  
>  	riscv_clock_event_irq = irq_create_mapping(domain, RV_IRQ_TIMER);
>  	if (!riscv_clock_event_irq) {
> -		pr_err("Failed to map timer interrupt for node [%pOF]\n", n);
> -		return -ENODEV;
> +		pr_err("Failed to map timer interrupt for node [%pfwP]\n",
> +			intc_fwnode);
>  	}
>  
> -	pr_info("%s: Registering clocksource cpuid [%d] hartid [%lu]\n",
> -	       __func__, cpuid, hartid);
>  	error = clocksource_register_hz(&riscv_clocksource, riscv_timebase);
>  	if (error) {
> -		pr_err("RISCV timer register failed [%d] for cpu = [%d]\n",
> -		       error, cpuid);
> +		pr_err("clocksource register failed [%d]\n", error);

If you're changing this, s/register/registration/ to be grammatically
correct I suppose.

>  		return error;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -199,7 +166,35 @@ static int __init riscv_timer_init_dt(struct device_node *n)
>  		static_branch_enable(&riscv_sstc_available);
>  	}
>  
> +	pr_info("timer registered using %s\n",
> +		(static_branch_likely(&riscv_sstc_available)) ?
> +		"RISC-V Sstc" : "RISC-V SBI");

Why is this needed? Isn't there a print like 3 lines above here that
says "Timer interrupt in S-mode is available via sstc extension"?

> +
>  	return error;
>  }
>  
> +static int __init riscv_timer_init_dt(struct device_node *n)
> +{
> +	int cpuid, error;
> +	unsigned long hartid;
> +
> +	error = riscv_of_processor_hartid(n, &hartid);
> +	if (error < 0) {
> +		pr_warn("Not valid hartid for node [%pOF] error = [%lu]\n",

While you're already moving this, may as well fix the grammar IMO.
s/Not valid/Invalid/

Cheers,
Conor.

> +			n, hartid);
> +		return error;
> +	}
> +
> +	cpuid = riscv_hartid_to_cpuid(hartid);
> +	if (cpuid < 0) {
> +		pr_warn("Invalid cpuid for hartid [%lu]\n", hartid);
> +		return cpuid;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (cpuid != smp_processor_id())
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return riscv_timer_init_common();
> +}
> +
>  TIMER_OF_DECLARE(riscv_timer, "riscv", riscv_timer_init_dt);
> -- 
> 2.38.0
> 

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-09 20:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 132+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-30 18:22 [PATCH 00/24] Add basic ACPI support for RISC-V Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 01/24] riscv: move sbi_init() earlier before jump_label_init() Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 02/24] ACPICA: MADT: Add RISC-V INTC interrupt controller Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-02-08 19:59   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-08 19:59     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-13  5:13     ` Sunil V L
2023-02-13  5:13       ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 03/24] ACPICA: Add structure definitions for RISC-V RHCT Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 04/24] RISC-V: ACPI: Add empty headers to enable ACPI core Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-02-08 19:55   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-08 19:55     ` Conor Dooley
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 05/24] RISC-V: ACPI: Add basic functions to build " Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-02-08 20:58   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-08 20:58     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-13 15:16     ` Sunil V L
2023-02-13 15:16       ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 06/24] RISC-V: ACPI: Add PCI " Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-02-08 21:26   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-08 21:26     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-13 15:23     ` Sunil V L
2023-02-13 15:23       ` Sunil V L
2023-02-13 17:14       ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-13 17:14         ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-13 17:26   ` Jessica Clarke
2023-02-13 17:26     ` Jessica Clarke
2023-02-14  4:42     ` Sunil V L
2023-02-14  4:42       ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 07/24] RISC-V: ACPI: Enable ACPI build infrastructure Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-02-08 21:31   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-08 21:31     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-13 15:23     ` Sunil V L
2023-02-13 15:23       ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 08/24] ACPI: Enable ACPI_PROCESSOR for RISC-V Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 09/24] ACPI: OSL: Make should_use_kmap() 0 " Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 10/24] ACPI: processor_core: RISC-V: Enable mapping processor to the hartid Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 11/24] RISC-V: ACPI: irqchip/riscv-intc: Add ACPI support Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 23:38   ` Jessica Clarke
2023-01-30 23:38     ` Jessica Clarke
2023-01-31  9:11     ` Sunil V L
2023-01-31  9:11       ` Sunil V L
2023-02-08 21:49   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-08 21:49     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-13 15:25     ` Sunil V L
2023-02-13 15:25       ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 12/24] RISC-V: ACPI: smpboot: Create wrapper smp_setup() Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-02-08 21:34   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-08 21:34     ` Conor Dooley
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 13/24] RISC-V: ACPI: smpboot: Add ACPI support in smp_setup() Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-02-08 22:10   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-08 22:10     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-13 15:27     ` Sunil V L
2023-02-13 15:27       ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 14/24] RISC-V: ACPI: smpboot: Add function to retrieve the hartid Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-02-09 20:30   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-09 20:30     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-13 17:00     ` Sunil V L
2023-02-13 17:00       ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 15/24] clocksource/timer-riscv: Refactor riscv_timer_init_dt() Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-02-09 20:54   ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2023-02-09 20:54     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-13 17:22     ` Sunil V L
2023-02-13 17:22       ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 16/24] RISC-V: ACPI: clocksource/timer-riscv: Add ACPI support Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-02-09 20:58   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-09 20:58     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-13 17:39     ` Sunil V L
2023-02-13 17:39       ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 17/24] ACPI: RISC-V: drivers/acpi: Add RHCT related code Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 18/24] RISC-V: ACPI: time.c: Add ACPI support for time_init() Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 19/24] RISC-V: ACPI: cpufeature: Add ACPI support in riscv_fill_hwcap() Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-02-09 21:47   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-09 21:47     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-13 17:51     ` Sunil V L
2023-02-13 17:51       ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 20/24] RISC-V: ACPI: cpu: Enable cpuinfo for ACPI systems Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-02-09 21:13   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-09 21:13     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-13 17:42     ` Sunil V L
2023-02-13 17:42       ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 21/24] RISC-V: ACPI: Add ACPI initialization in setup_arch() Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-02-09 21:53   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-09 21:53     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-13 17:52     ` Sunil V L
2023-02-13 17:52       ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 22/24] RISC-V: ACPI: Enable ACPI in defconfig Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 23:47   ` Conor Dooley
2023-01-30 23:47     ` Conor Dooley
2023-01-31  8:41     ` Sunil V L
2023-01-31  8:41       ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 23/24] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for drivers/acpi/riscv Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-02-09 21:54   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-09 21:54     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-13 17:53     ` Sunil V L
2023-02-13 17:53       ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22 ` [PATCH 24/24] Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt: Add RISC-V for ACPI parameter Sunil V L
2023-01-30 18:22   ` Sunil V L
2023-02-09  2:02   ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-02-09  2:02     ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-02-13 15:29     ` Sunil V L
2023-02-13 15:29       ` Sunil V L
2023-01-30 19:11 ` [PATCH 00/24] Add basic ACPI support for RISC-V Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-01-30 19:11   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-02-08 18:28 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-08 18:28   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-08 18:50   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-08 18:50     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-13  4:51     ` Sunil V L
2023-02-13  4:51       ` Sunil V L

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y+Vdc09bWb9CTXyt@spud \
    --to=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sunilvl@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.