From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: petrm@nvidia.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, razor@blackwall.org,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, edumazet@google.com,
mlxsw@nvidia.com, roopa@nvidia.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 3/4] bridge: mcast: Move validation to a policy
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2023 17:45:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+e4NTGi7VASbm5K@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230210192057.4927b002@kernel.org>
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 07:20:57PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 09:18:51 +0200 Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > + if (nla_len(attr) != sizeof(struct br_mdb_entry)) {
> > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Invalid MDBA_SET_ENTRY attribute length");
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> Well, you're just moving it, but NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR() would be better.
> We shouldn't be adding _MOD() in the core implementation of the family.
Assuming you are referring to this code when it's moved to
net/core/rtnetlink.c, then I already removed the _MOD() suffix from it
(as visible in the RFC). I can squash this as well:
diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index c9f878a28d32..491e4231b3dd 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -6138,7 +6138,7 @@ static int rtnl_validate_mdb_entry(const struct nlattr *attr,
struct br_mdb_entry *entry = nla_data(attr);
if (nla_len(attr) != sizeof(struct br_mdb_entry)) {
- NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid MDBA_SET_ENTRY attribute length");
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, attr, "Invalid attribute length");
return -EINVAL;
}
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
razor@blackwall.org, roopa@nvidia.com, petrm@nvidia.com,
mlxsw@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] bridge: mcast: Move validation to a policy
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2023 17:45:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+e4NTGi7VASbm5K@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230210192057.4927b002@kernel.org>
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 07:20:57PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 09:18:51 +0200 Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > + if (nla_len(attr) != sizeof(struct br_mdb_entry)) {
> > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Invalid MDBA_SET_ENTRY attribute length");
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> Well, you're just moving it, but NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR() would be better.
> We shouldn't be adding _MOD() in the core implementation of the family.
Assuming you are referring to this code when it's moved to
net/core/rtnetlink.c, then I already removed the _MOD() suffix from it
(as visible in the RFC). I can squash this as well:
diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index c9f878a28d32..491e4231b3dd 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -6138,7 +6138,7 @@ static int rtnl_validate_mdb_entry(const struct nlattr *attr,
struct br_mdb_entry *entry = nla_data(attr);
if (nla_len(attr) != sizeof(struct br_mdb_entry)) {
- NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid MDBA_SET_ENTRY attribute length");
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, attr, "Invalid attribute length");
return -EINVAL;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-11 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-09 7:18 [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 0/4] bridge: mcast: Preparations for VXLAN MDB Ido Schimmel
2023-02-09 7:18 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-02-09 7:18 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 1/4] bridge: mcast: Use correct define in MDB dump Ido Schimmel
2023-02-09 7:18 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-02-09 8:18 ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-02-09 8:18 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-02-09 7:18 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 2/4] bridge: mcast: Remove pointless sequence generation counter assignment Ido Schimmel
2023-02-09 7:18 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-02-09 8:19 ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-02-09 8:19 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-02-09 7:18 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 3/4] bridge: mcast: Move validation to a policy Ido Schimmel
2023-02-09 7:18 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-02-09 8:23 ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-02-09 8:23 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-02-11 3:20 ` [Bridge] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-02-11 3:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-02-11 15:45 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2023-02-11 15:45 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-02-09 7:18 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 4/4] selftests: forwarding: Add MDB dump test cases Ido Schimmel
2023-02-09 7:18 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-02-09 8:24 ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-02-09 8:24 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-02-11 3:40 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 0/4] bridge: mcast: Preparations for VXLAN MDB patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-02-11 3:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y+e4NTGi7VASbm5K@shredder \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=mlxsw@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.