Re: [PATCH bpf-next] net: lan966x: set xdp_features flag

[Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1089 bytes --]

> Set xdp_features netdevice flag if lan966x nic supports xdp mode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
> index 580c91d24a52..b24e55e61dc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
> @@ -823,6 +823,11 @@ static int lan966x_probe_port(struct lan966x *lan966x, u32 p,
>  
>  	port->phylink = phylink;
>  
> +	if (lan966x->fdma)
> +		dev->xdp_features = NETDEV_XDP_ACT_BASIC |
> +				    NETDEV_XDP_ACT_REDIRECT |
> +				    NETDEV_XDP_ACT_NDO_XMIT;
> +
>  	err = register_netdev(dev);
>  	if (err) {
>  		dev_err(lan966x->dev, "register_netdev failed\n");

Since the xdp-features series is now merged in net-next, do you think it is
better to target this patch to net-next?

Regards,
Lorenzo

> -- 
> 2.39.1
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]