From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
Christoph Muellner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] riscv: Fix alternatives issues on for-next
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 15:09:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+kBDQARCqIucrWi@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230212021534.59121-1-samuel@sholland.org>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 686 bytes --]
Hey Samuel,
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 08:15:31PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> Several people have reported that D1 fails to boot on linux-next.
> Patch 1 fixes a bug where early alternative patching used the wrong
> address. Patch 2 fixes a separate issue where the Zbb alternatives
> are incorrectly applied based on the 'C' extension instead of Zbb.
On Icicle, Nezha & VisionFive 2:
Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
I was really curious why my CI didn't catch this, but I think boot
on Icicle wasn't broken as the toolchains pre-date Zbb and therefore it
isn't even compiled in.
And the VisionFive 2 doesn't care as it has Zbb.
Thanks for the fixes :)
Conor.
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
Christoph Muellner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] riscv: Fix alternatives issues on for-next
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 15:09:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+kBDQARCqIucrWi@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230212021534.59121-1-samuel@sholland.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 686 bytes --]
Hey Samuel,
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 08:15:31PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> Several people have reported that D1 fails to boot on linux-next.
> Patch 1 fixes a bug where early alternative patching used the wrong
> address. Patch 2 fixes a separate issue where the Zbb alternatives
> are incorrectly applied based on the 'C' extension instead of Zbb.
On Icicle, Nezha & VisionFive 2:
Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
I was really curious why my CI didn't catch this, but I think boot
on Icicle wasn't broken as the toolchains pre-date Zbb and therefore it
isn't even compiled in.
And the VisionFive 2 doesn't care as it has Zbb.
Thanks for the fixes :)
Conor.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-12 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-12 2:15 [PATCH 0/2] riscv: Fix alternatives issues on for-next Samuel Holland
2023-02-12 2:15 ` Samuel Holland
2023-02-12 2:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] riscv: Fix early alternative patching Samuel Holland
2023-02-12 2:15 ` Samuel Holland
2023-02-12 15:48 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-12 15:48 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-13 1:22 ` Guo Ren
2023-02-13 1:22 ` Guo Ren
2023-02-13 16:46 ` Jisheng Zhang
2023-02-13 16:46 ` Jisheng Zhang
2023-02-12 2:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] riscv: Fix Zbb alternative IDs Samuel Holland
2023-02-12 2:15 ` Samuel Holland
2023-02-12 15:20 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-12 15:20 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-12 16:31 ` Andrew Jones
2023-02-12 16:31 ` Andrew Jones
2023-02-13 1:19 ` Guo Ren
2023-02-13 1:19 ` Guo Ren
2023-02-12 15:09 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2023-02-12 15:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] riscv: Fix alternatives issues on for-next Conor Dooley
2023-02-13 1:23 ` Guo Ren
2023-02-13 1:23 ` Guo Ren
2023-02-15 14:56 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-02-15 14:56 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-02-15 15:00 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
2023-02-15 15:00 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y+kBDQARCqIucrWi@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=christoph.muellner@vrull.eu \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.