From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Cleo John <waterdev@galaxycrow.de>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed styling in riscv ucontext header
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2022 13:14:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y0K7PDzwuOPweYSm@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221009120340.GA41243@watet-ms7b87>
Hey Cleo,
On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 02:03:40PM +0200, Cleo John wrote:
> Fixed styling in riscv ucontext header
This should probably be "riscv: fix styling..."
> This patch changes the two comments in ucontext.h by getting them up to the cody style proposed by torwalds.
s/This patch changes/Change
Looks like some typos here too & your lines need to be wrapped at 72
characters for commit messages. git usually enforces that automatically
when you do a `git commit`.
> In my opinion this also improves the readability so I think this is a useful change to do.
> Please also tell me if you have a different opinion.
FYI commentary on the patch should go below the ---.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cleo John <waterdev@galaxycrow.de>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h
> index 44eb993950e5..0cd6f8616985 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h
> @@ -18,7 +18,8 @@ struct ucontext {
> /* There's some padding here to allow sigset_t to be expanded in the
Why fix the closing comment but leave the opening ones incorrect?
Thanks,
Conor.
> * future. Though this is unlikely, other architectures put uc_sigmask
> * at the end of this structure and explicitly state it can be
> - * expanded, so we didn't want to box ourselves in here. */
> + * expanded, so we didn't want to box ourselves in here.
> + */
> __u8 __unused[1024 / 8 - sizeof(sigset_t)];
> /* We can't put uc_sigmask at the end of this structure because we need
> * to be able to expand sigcontext in the future. For example, the
> @@ -27,7 +28,8 @@ struct ucontext {
> * ucontext, so we're putting this at the end in order to allow for
> * infinite extensibility. Since we know this will be extended and we
> * assume sigset_t won't be extended an extreme amount, we're
> - * prioritizing this. */
> + * prioritizing this.
> + */
> struct sigcontext uc_mcontext;
> };
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Cleo John <waterdev@galaxycrow.de>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed styling in riscv ucontext header
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2022 13:14:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y0K7PDzwuOPweYSm@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221009120340.GA41243@watet-ms7b87>
Hey Cleo,
On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 02:03:40PM +0200, Cleo John wrote:
> Fixed styling in riscv ucontext header
This should probably be "riscv: fix styling..."
> This patch changes the two comments in ucontext.h by getting them up to the cody style proposed by torwalds.
s/This patch changes/Change
Looks like some typos here too & your lines need to be wrapped at 72
characters for commit messages. git usually enforces that automatically
when you do a `git commit`.
> In my opinion this also improves the readability so I think this is a useful change to do.
> Please also tell me if you have a different opinion.
FYI commentary on the patch should go below the ---.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cleo John <waterdev@galaxycrow.de>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h
> index 44eb993950e5..0cd6f8616985 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h
> @@ -18,7 +18,8 @@ struct ucontext {
> /* There's some padding here to allow sigset_t to be expanded in the
Why fix the closing comment but leave the opening ones incorrect?
Thanks,
Conor.
> * future. Though this is unlikely, other architectures put uc_sigmask
> * at the end of this structure and explicitly state it can be
> - * expanded, so we didn't want to box ourselves in here. */
> + * expanded, so we didn't want to box ourselves in here.
> + */
> __u8 __unused[1024 / 8 - sizeof(sigset_t)];
> /* We can't put uc_sigmask at the end of this structure because we need
> * to be able to expand sigcontext in the future. For example, the
> @@ -27,7 +28,8 @@ struct ucontext {
> * ucontext, so we're putting this at the end in order to allow for
> * infinite extensibility. Since we know this will be extended and we
> * assume sigset_t won't be extended an extreme amount, we're
> - * prioritizing this. */
> + * prioritizing this.
> + */
> struct sigcontext uc_mcontext;
> };
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-09 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-09 12:03 [PATCH] Fixed styling in riscv ucontext header Cleo John
2022-10-09 12:03 ` Cleo John
2022-10-09 12:14 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2022-10-09 12:14 ` Conor Dooley
2022-10-09 12:38 ` Cleo John
2022-10-09 12:38 ` Cleo John
2022-10-09 12:43 ` Conor Dooley
2022-10-09 12:43 ` Conor Dooley
2022-10-09 12:49 ` Cleo John
2022-10-09 12:49 ` Cleo John
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y0K7PDzwuOPweYSm@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=waterdev@galaxycrow.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.