All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Sean Christopherson" <seanjc@google.com>,
	"Vincent Donnefort" <vdonnefort@google.com>,
	"Alexandru Elisei" <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
	"James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
	"Chao Peng" <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
	"Quentin Perret" <qperret@google.com>,
	"Suzuki K Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Fuad Tabba" <tabba@google.com>, "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
	kernel-team@android.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/25] KVM: arm64: Allow attaching of non-coalescable pages to a hyp pool
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 00:17:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1sfpM3IjNvr8ckf@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221020133827.5541-3-will@kernel.org>

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 02:38:04PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
> 
> All the contiguous pages used to initialize a 'struct hyp_pool' are
> considered coalescable, which means that the hyp page allocator will
> actively try to merge them with their buddies on the hyp_put_page() path.
> However, using hyp_put_page() on a page that is not part of the inital
> memory range given to a hyp_pool() is currently unsupported.
> 
> In order to allow dynamically extending hyp pools at run-time, add a
> check to __hyp_attach_page() to allow inserting 'external' pages into
> the free-list of order 0. This will be necessary to allow lazy donation
> of pages from the host to the hypervisor when allocating guest stage-2
> page-table pages at EL2.

Is it ever going to be the case that we wind up mixing static and
dynamic memory within the same buddy allocator? Reading ahead a bit it
would seem pKVM uses separate allocators (i.e. pkvm_hyp_vm::pool for
donated memory) but just wanted to make sure.

I suppose what I'm getting at is the fact that the pool range makes
little sense in this case. Adding a field to hyp_pool describing the
type of pool that it is would make this more readable, such that we know
a pool contains only donated memory, and thus zero order pages should
never be coalesced.

> Tested-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/page_alloc.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/page_alloc.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/page_alloc.c
> index 1ded09fc9b10..0d15227aced8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/page_alloc.c
> @@ -93,11 +93,15 @@ static inline struct hyp_page *node_to_page(struct list_head *node)
>  static void __hyp_attach_page(struct hyp_pool *pool,
>  			      struct hyp_page *p)
>  {
> +	phys_addr_t phys = hyp_page_to_phys(p);
>  	unsigned short order = p->order;
>  	struct hyp_page *buddy;
>  
>  	memset(hyp_page_to_virt(p), 0, PAGE_SIZE << p->order);
>  
> +	if (phys < pool->range_start || phys >= pool->range_end)
> +		goto insert;
> +

Assuming this is kept as-is...

This check reads really odd to me, but I understand how it applies to
the use case here. Perhaps create a helper (to be shared with
__find_buddy_nocheck()) and add a nice comment atop it describing the
significance of pages that exist outside the boundaries of the buddy
allocator.

--
Thanks,
Oliver

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Sean Christopherson" <seanjc@google.com>,
	"Vincent Donnefort" <vdonnefort@google.com>,
	"Alexandru Elisei" <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
	"James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
	"Chao Peng" <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
	"Quentin Perret" <qperret@google.com>,
	"Suzuki K Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Fuad Tabba" <tabba@google.com>, "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
	kernel-team@android.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/25] KVM: arm64: Allow attaching of non-coalescable pages to a hyp pool
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 00:17:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1sfpM3IjNvr8ckf@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221020133827.5541-3-will@kernel.org>

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 02:38:04PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
> 
> All the contiguous pages used to initialize a 'struct hyp_pool' are
> considered coalescable, which means that the hyp page allocator will
> actively try to merge them with their buddies on the hyp_put_page() path.
> However, using hyp_put_page() on a page that is not part of the inital
> memory range given to a hyp_pool() is currently unsupported.
> 
> In order to allow dynamically extending hyp pools at run-time, add a
> check to __hyp_attach_page() to allow inserting 'external' pages into
> the free-list of order 0. This will be necessary to allow lazy donation
> of pages from the host to the hypervisor when allocating guest stage-2
> page-table pages at EL2.

Is it ever going to be the case that we wind up mixing static and
dynamic memory within the same buddy allocator? Reading ahead a bit it
would seem pKVM uses separate allocators (i.e. pkvm_hyp_vm::pool for
donated memory) but just wanted to make sure.

I suppose what I'm getting at is the fact that the pool range makes
little sense in this case. Adding a field to hyp_pool describing the
type of pool that it is would make this more readable, such that we know
a pool contains only donated memory, and thus zero order pages should
never be coalesced.

> Tested-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/page_alloc.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/page_alloc.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/page_alloc.c
> index 1ded09fc9b10..0d15227aced8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/page_alloc.c
> @@ -93,11 +93,15 @@ static inline struct hyp_page *node_to_page(struct list_head *node)
>  static void __hyp_attach_page(struct hyp_pool *pool,
>  			      struct hyp_page *p)
>  {
> +	phys_addr_t phys = hyp_page_to_phys(p);
>  	unsigned short order = p->order;
>  	struct hyp_page *buddy;
>  
>  	memset(hyp_page_to_virt(p), 0, PAGE_SIZE << p->order);
>  
> +	if (phys < pool->range_start || phys >= pool->range_end)
> +		goto insert;
> +

Assuming this is kept as-is...

This check reads really odd to me, but I understand how it applies to
the use case here. Perhaps create a helper (to be shared with
__find_buddy_nocheck()) and add a nice comment atop it describing the
significance of pages that exist outside the boundaries of the buddy
allocator.

--
Thanks,
Oliver

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-28  0:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-20 13:38 [PATCH v5 00/25] KVM: arm64: Introduce pKVM hyp VM and vCPU state at EL2 Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38 ` Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 01/25] KVM: arm64: Move hyp refcount manipulation helpers to common header file Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 02/25] KVM: arm64: Allow attaching of non-coalescable pages to a hyp pool Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-28  0:17   ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2022-10-28  0:17     ` Oliver Upton
2022-10-28  8:09     ` Oliver Upton
2022-10-28  8:09       ` Oliver Upton
2022-10-28  9:29       ` Quentin Perret
2022-10-28  9:29         ` Quentin Perret
2022-10-28  9:28     ` Quentin Perret
2022-10-28  9:28       ` Quentin Perret
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 03/25] KVM: arm64: Back the hypervisor 'struct hyp_page' array for all memory Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 04/25] KVM: arm64: Fix-up hyp stage-1 refcounts for all pages mapped at EL2 Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-28  0:31   ` Oliver Upton
2022-10-28  0:31     ` Oliver Upton
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 05/25] KVM: arm64: Unify identifiers used to distinguish host and hypervisor Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-28  0:32   ` Oliver Upton
2022-10-28  0:32     ` Oliver Upton
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 06/25] KVM: arm64: Implement do_donate() helper for donating memory Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-28  7:52   ` Oliver Upton
2022-10-28  7:52     ` Oliver Upton
2022-10-28 10:01     ` Quentin Perret
2022-10-28 10:01       ` Quentin Perret
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 07/25] KVM: arm64: Prevent the donation of no-map pages Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 08/25] KVM: arm64: Add helpers to pin memory shared with the hypervisor at EL2 Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 09/25] KVM: arm64: Include asm/kvm_mmu.h in nvhe/mem_protect.h Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 10/25] KVM: arm64: Add hyp_spinlock_t static initializer Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 11/25] KVM: arm64: Rename 'host_kvm' to 'host_mmu' Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 12/25] KVM: arm64: Add infrastructure to create and track pKVM instances at EL2 Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 13/25] KVM: arm64: Instantiate pKVM hypervisor VM and vCPU structures from EL1 Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 14/25] KVM: arm64: Add per-cpu fixmap infrastructure at EL2 Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 15/25] KVM: arm64: Initialise hypervisor copies of host symbols unconditionally Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 16/25] KVM: arm64: Provide I-cache invalidation by virtual address at EL2 Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 17/25] KVM: arm64: Add generic hyp_memcache helpers Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 18/25] KVM: arm64: Consolidate stage-2 initialisation into a single function Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 19/25] KVM: arm64: Instantiate guest stage-2 page-tables at EL2 Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 20/25] KVM: arm64: Return guest memory from EL2 via dedicated teardown memcache Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-27 13:13   ` Quentin Perret
2022-10-27 13:13     ` Quentin Perret
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 21/25] KVM: arm64: Unmap 'kvm_arm_hyp_percpu_base' from the host Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 22/25] KVM: arm64: Maintain a copy of 'kvm_arm_vmid_bits' at EL2 Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 23/25] KVM: arm64: Explicitly map 'kvm_vgic_global_state' " Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 24/25] KVM: arm64: Don't unnecessarily map host kernel sections " Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38 ` [RFC PATCH v5 25/25] KVM: arm64: Use the pKVM hyp vCPU structure in handle___kvm_vcpu_run() Will Deacon
2022-10-20 13:38   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y1sfpM3IjNvr8ckf@google.com \
    --to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.