All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	patryk.piotrowski@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] iavf: check that state transitions happen under lock
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 15:24:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2up+sLH5qN34msN@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5911b8f9-590b-6e05-646a-c1bc597105d8@kpanic.de>

On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 12:57:42PM +0100, Stefan Assmann wrote:
> On 06.11.22 20:14, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 03:45:15PM +0200, Stefan Assmann wrote:
> 
> >> Add a check to make sure crit_lock is being held during every state
> 
> >> transition and print a warning if that's not the case. For convenience
> 
> >> a wrapper is added that helps pointing out where the locking is missing.
> 
> >>
> 
> >> Make an exception for iavf_probe() as that is too early in the init
> 
> >> process and generates a false positive report.
> 
> >>
> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de>
> 
> >> ---
> 
> >>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf.h      | 23 +++++++++++++++------
> 
> >>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c |  2 +-
> 
> >>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> >>
> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf.h
> 
> >> index 3f6187c16424..28f41bbc9c86 100644
> 
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf.h
> 
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf.h
> 
> >> @@ -498,19 +498,30 @@ static inline const char *iavf_state_str(enum iavf_state_t state)
> 
> >>  	}
> 
> >>  }
> 
> >>  
> 
> >> -static inline void iavf_change_state(struct iavf_adapter *adapter,
> 
> >> -				     enum iavf_state_t state)
> 
> >> +static inline void __iavf_change_state(struct iavf_adapter *adapter,
> 
> >> +				       enum iavf_state_t state,
> 
> >> +				       const char *func,
> 
> >> +				       int line)
> 
> >>  {
> 
> >>  	if (adapter->state != state) {
> 
> >>  		adapter->last_state = adapter->state;
> 
> >>  		adapter->state = state;
> 
> >>  	}
> 
> >> -	dev_dbg(&adapter->pdev->dev,
> 
> >> -		"state transition from:%s to:%s\n",
> 
> >> -		iavf_state_str(adapter->last_state),
> 
> >> -		iavf_state_str(adapter->state));
> 
> >> +	if (mutex_is_locked(&adapter->crit_lock))
> 
> > 
> 
> > Please use lockdep for that, and not reinvent it.
> 
> > In you case lockdep_assert_held(&adapter->crit_lock).
> 
> 
> 
> Lockdep is mostly enabled in debug kernel but I was hoping to get
> 
> warnings in production environments as well. As those transitions don't
> 
> happen too often it shouldn't hurt performance.
> 
> 
> 
> > In addition, mutex_is_locked() doesn't check that this specific function
> 
> > is locked. It checks that this lock is used now.
> 
> 
> 
> You are correct, this check only triggers if crit_lock is not locked at
> 
> all. It would be better to check the lock owner, but I couldn't find an
> 
> easy way to do that. Better than no check IMO but we can drop it if you
> 
> don't see a benefit in it.

Yes, please drop it. AFAIK, lockdep doesn't add much overhead while enabled.

Thanks

> 
> 
> 
> Thanks for the comments!
> 
> 
> 
>   Stefan
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, patryk.piotrowski@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] iavf: check that state transitions happen under lock
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 15:24:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2up+sLH5qN34msN@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5911b8f9-590b-6e05-646a-c1bc597105d8@kpanic.de>

On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 12:57:42PM +0100, Stefan Assmann wrote:
> On 06.11.22 20:14, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 03:45:15PM +0200, Stefan Assmann wrote:
> 
> >> Add a check to make sure crit_lock is being held during every state
> 
> >> transition and print a warning if that's not the case. For convenience
> 
> >> a wrapper is added that helps pointing out where the locking is missing.
> 
> >>
> 
> >> Make an exception for iavf_probe() as that is too early in the init
> 
> >> process and generates a false positive report.
> 
> >>
> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de>
> 
> >> ---
> 
> >>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf.h      | 23 +++++++++++++++------
> 
> >>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c |  2 +-
> 
> >>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> >>
> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf.h
> 
> >> index 3f6187c16424..28f41bbc9c86 100644
> 
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf.h
> 
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf.h
> 
> >> @@ -498,19 +498,30 @@ static inline const char *iavf_state_str(enum iavf_state_t state)
> 
> >>  	}
> 
> >>  }
> 
> >>  
> 
> >> -static inline void iavf_change_state(struct iavf_adapter *adapter,
> 
> >> -				     enum iavf_state_t state)
> 
> >> +static inline void __iavf_change_state(struct iavf_adapter *adapter,
> 
> >> +				       enum iavf_state_t state,
> 
> >> +				       const char *func,
> 
> >> +				       int line)
> 
> >>  {
> 
> >>  	if (adapter->state != state) {
> 
> >>  		adapter->last_state = adapter->state;
> 
> >>  		adapter->state = state;
> 
> >>  	}
> 
> >> -	dev_dbg(&adapter->pdev->dev,
> 
> >> -		"state transition from:%s to:%s\n",
> 
> >> -		iavf_state_str(adapter->last_state),
> 
> >> -		iavf_state_str(adapter->state));
> 
> >> +	if (mutex_is_locked(&adapter->crit_lock))
> 
> > 
> 
> > Please use lockdep for that, and not reinvent it.
> 
> > In you case lockdep_assert_held(&adapter->crit_lock).
> 
> 
> 
> Lockdep is mostly enabled in debug kernel but I was hoping to get
> 
> warnings in production environments as well. As those transitions don't
> 
> happen too often it shouldn't hurt performance.
> 
> 
> 
> > In addition, mutex_is_locked() doesn't check that this specific function
> 
> > is locked. It checks that this lock is used now.
> 
> 
> 
> You are correct, this check only triggers if crit_lock is not locked at
> 
> all. It would be better to check the lock owner, but I couldn't find an
> 
> easy way to do that. Better than no check IMO but we can drop it if you
> 
> don't see a benefit in it.

Yes, please drop it. AFAIK, lockdep doesn't add much overhead while enabled.

Thanks

> 
> 
> 
> Thanks for the comments!
> 
> 
> 
>   Stefan
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-09 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-28 13:45 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] iavf: check that state transitions happen under lock Stefan Assmann
2022-10-28 13:45 ` Stefan Assmann
2022-11-03 11:46 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jankowski, Konrad0
2022-11-03 11:46   ` Jankowski, Konrad0
2022-11-06 19:14 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-06 19:14   ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-07 11:57   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Stefan Assmann
2022-11-07 11:57     ` Stefan Assmann
2022-11-09 13:24     ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2022-11-09 13:24       ` Leon Romanovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y2up+sLH5qN34msN@unreal \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patryk.piotrowski@intel.com \
    --cc=sassmann@kpanic.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.