Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] leds: deduplicate led_init_default_state_get()

From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: Gene Chen <gene_chen@richtek.com>,
	Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>,
	linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
	Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] leds: deduplicate led_init_default_state_get()
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 12:19:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3IWMe5nGePMAEFv@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y3IUTUr/MXf9RQEP@google.com>

On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 10:11:25AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Nov 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 05:32:26PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 08:53:49AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 25 Oct 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 04:49:53PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > There are several users of LED framework that reimplement the
> > > > > > functionality of led_init_default_state_get(). In order to
> > > > > > deduplicate them move the declaration to the global header
> > > > > > (patch 2) and convert users (patche 3-11).
> > > > > 
> > > > > Dear LED maintainers, is there any news on this series? It's hanging around
> > > > > for almost 2 months now...
> > > > 
> > > > My offer still stands if help is required.
> > > 
> > > From my point of view the LED subsystem is quite laggish lately (as shown by
> > > this patch series, for instance), which means that _in practice_ the help is
> > > needed, but I haven't got if we have any administrative agreement on that.
> > > 
> > > Pavel?
> > 
> > So, Pavel seems quite unresponsive lately... Shall we just move on and take
> > maintainership?
> 
> I had an off-line conversation with Greg who advised me against that.

OK. What the reasonable option we have then?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko