From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Zhang Lei <zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] arm64/fp: Use a struct to pass data to fpsimd_bind_state_to_cpu()
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 10:33:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3IZfgDCEoA6Rt2s@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221021230321.1159287-9-broonie@kernel.org>
On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 12:03:21AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> For reasons that are unclear to this reader fpsimd_bind_state_to_cpu()
> populates the struct fpsimd_last_state_struct that it uses to store the
> active floating point state for KVM guests by passing an argument for
> each member of the structure. As the richness of the architecture increases
> this is resulting in a function with a rather large number of arguments
> which isn't ideal.
>
> Simplify the interface by using the struct directly as the single argument
> for the function, renaming it as we lift the definition into the header.
> This could be built on further to reduce the work we do adding storage for
> new FP state in various places but for now it just simplifies this one
> interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
I think this looks cleaner.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Zhang Lei <zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] arm64/fp: Use a struct to pass data to fpsimd_bind_state_to_cpu()
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 10:33:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3IZfgDCEoA6Rt2s@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221021230321.1159287-9-broonie@kernel.org>
On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 12:03:21AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> For reasons that are unclear to this reader fpsimd_bind_state_to_cpu()
> populates the struct fpsimd_last_state_struct that it uses to store the
> active floating point state for KVM guests by passing an argument for
> each member of the structure. As the richness of the architecture increases
> this is resulting in a function with a rather large number of arguments
> which isn't ideal.
>
> Simplify the interface by using the struct directly as the single argument
> for the function, renaming it as we lift the definition into the header.
> This could be built on further to reduce the work we do adding storage for
> new FP state in various places but for now it just simplifies this one
> interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
I think this looks cleaner.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-14 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-21 23:03 [PATCH v4 0/8] arm64/sve: Clean up KVM integration and optimise syscalls Mark Brown
2022-10-21 23:03 ` Mark Brown
2022-10-21 23:03 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] KVM: arm64: Discard any SVE state when entering KVM guests Mark Brown
2022-10-21 23:03 ` Mark Brown
2022-11-13 22:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-11-13 22:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-10-21 23:03 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] arm64/fpsimd: Track the saved FPSIMD state type separately to TIF_SVE Mark Brown
2022-10-21 23:03 ` Mark Brown
2022-11-13 22:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-11-13 22:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-11-14 11:10 ` Mark Brown
2022-11-14 11:10 ` Mark Brown
2022-10-21 23:03 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] arm64/fpsimd: Have KVM explicitly say which FP registers to save Mark Brown
2022-10-21 23:03 ` Mark Brown
2022-11-13 22:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-11-13 22:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-10-21 23:03 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] arm64/fpsimd: Stop using TIF_SVE to manage register saving in KVM Mark Brown
2022-10-21 23:03 ` Mark Brown
2022-11-13 22:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-11-13 22:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-10-21 23:03 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] arm64/fpsimd: Load FP state based on recorded data type Mark Brown
2022-10-21 23:03 ` Mark Brown
2022-11-14 9:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-11-14 9:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-10-21 23:03 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] arm64/fpsimd: SME no longer requires SVE register state Mark Brown
2022-10-21 23:03 ` Mark Brown
2022-11-14 10:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-11-14 10:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-10-21 23:03 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] arm64/sve: Leave SVE enabled on syscall if we don't context switch Mark Brown
2022-10-21 23:03 ` Mark Brown
2022-11-14 10:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-11-14 10:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-11-14 11:25 ` Mark Brown
2022-11-14 11:25 ` Mark Brown
2022-10-21 23:03 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] arm64/fp: Use a struct to pass data to fpsimd_bind_state_to_cpu() Mark Brown
2022-10-21 23:03 ` Mark Brown
2022-11-14 10:33 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2022-11-14 10:33 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3IZfgDCEoA6Rt2s@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.