* [PATCH net] net: dsa: don't leak tagger-owned storage on switch driver unbind
@ 2022-11-14 14:35 Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-15 21:57 ` Saeed Mahameed
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Oltean @ 2022-11-14 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: Andrew Lunn, Florian Fainelli, Vladimir Oltean, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni
In the initial commit dc452a471dba ("net: dsa: introduce tagger-owned
storage for private and shared data"), we had a call to
tag_ops->disconnect(dst) issued from dsa_tree_free(), which is called at
tree teardown time.
There were problems with connecting to a switch tree as a whole, so this
got reworked to connecting to individual switches within the tree. In
this process, tag_ops->disconnect(ds) was made to be called only from
switch.c (cross-chip notifiers emitted as a result of dynamic tag proto
changes), but the normal driver teardown code path wasn't replaced with
anything.
Solve this problem by adding a function that does the opposite of
dsa_switch_setup_tag_protocol(), which is called from the equivalent
spot in dsa_switch_teardown(). The positioning here also ensures that we
won't have any use-after-free in tagging protocol (*rcv) ops, since the
teardown sequence is as follows:
dsa_tree_teardown
-> dsa_tree_teardown_master
-> dsa_master_teardown
-> unsets master->dsa_ptr, making no further packets match the
ETH_P_XDSA packet type handler
-> dsa_tree_teardown_ports
-> dsa_port_teardown
-> dsa_slave_destroy
-> unregisters DSA net devices, there is even a synchronize_net()
in unregister_netdevice_many()
-> dsa_tree_teardown_switches
-> dsa_switch_teardown
-> dsa_switch_teardown_tag_protocol
-> finally frees the tagger-owned storage
Fixes: 7f2973149c22 ("net: dsa: make tagging protocols connect to individual switches from a tree")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
---
net/dsa/dsa2.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa2.c b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
index b80dbd02e154..12145c852902 100644
--- a/net/dsa/dsa2.c
+++ b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
@@ -855,6 +855,14 @@ static int dsa_switch_setup_tag_protocol(struct dsa_switch *ds)
return err;
}
+static void dsa_switch_teardown_tag_protocol(struct dsa_switch *ds)
+{
+ const struct dsa_device_ops *tag_ops = ds->dst->tag_ops;
+
+ if (tag_ops->disconnect)
+ tag_ops->disconnect(ds);
+}
+
static int dsa_switch_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
struct dsa_devlink_priv *dl_priv;
@@ -944,6 +952,8 @@ static void dsa_switch_teardown(struct dsa_switch *ds)
ds->slave_mii_bus = NULL;
}
+ dsa_switch_teardown_tag_protocol(ds);
+
if (ds->ops->teardown)
ds->ops->teardown(ds);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: don't leak tagger-owned storage on switch driver unbind
2022-11-14 14:35 [PATCH net] net: dsa: don't leak tagger-owned storage on switch driver unbind Vladimir Oltean
@ 2022-11-15 21:57 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-11-15 22:52 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-11-16 5:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Saeed Mahameed @ 2022-11-15 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vladimir Oltean
Cc: netdev, Andrew Lunn, Florian Fainelli, Vladimir Oltean,
David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni
On 14 Nov 16:35, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>In the initial commit dc452a471dba ("net: dsa: introduce tagger-owned
>storage for private and shared data"), we had a call to
>tag_ops->disconnect(dst) issued from dsa_tree_free(), which is called at
>tree teardown time.
>
>There were problems with connecting to a switch tree as a whole, so this
>got reworked to connecting to individual switches within the tree. In
>this process, tag_ops->disconnect(ds) was made to be called only from
>switch.c (cross-chip notifiers emitted as a result of dynamic tag proto
>changes), but the normal driver teardown code path wasn't replaced with
>anything.
>
>Solve this problem by adding a function that does the opposite of
>dsa_switch_setup_tag_protocol(), which is called from the equivalent
>spot in dsa_switch_teardown(). The positioning here also ensures that we
>won't have any use-after-free in tagging protocol (*rcv) ops, since the
>teardown sequence is as follows:
>
>dsa_tree_teardown
>-> dsa_tree_teardown_master
> -> dsa_master_teardown
> -> unsets master->dsa_ptr, making no further packets match the
> ETH_P_XDSA packet type handler
>-> dsa_tree_teardown_ports
> -> dsa_port_teardown
> -> dsa_slave_destroy
> -> unregisters DSA net devices, there is even a synchronize_net()
> in unregister_netdevice_many()
>-> dsa_tree_teardown_switches
> -> dsa_switch_teardown
> -> dsa_switch_teardown_tag_protocol
> -> finally frees the tagger-owned storage
>
>Fixes: 7f2973149c22 ("net: dsa: make tagging protocols connect to individual switches from a tree")
>Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: don't leak tagger-owned storage on switch driver unbind
2022-11-14 14:35 [PATCH net] net: dsa: don't leak tagger-owned storage on switch driver unbind Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-15 21:57 ` Saeed Mahameed
@ 2022-11-15 22:52 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-11-16 5:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2022-11-15 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vladimir Oltean, netdev
Cc: Andrew Lunn, Vladimir Oltean, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni
On 11/14/22 06:35, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> In the initial commit dc452a471dba ("net: dsa: introduce tagger-owned
> storage for private and shared data"), we had a call to
> tag_ops->disconnect(dst) issued from dsa_tree_free(), which is called at
> tree teardown time.
>
> There were problems with connecting to a switch tree as a whole, so this
> got reworked to connecting to individual switches within the tree. In
> this process, tag_ops->disconnect(ds) was made to be called only from
> switch.c (cross-chip notifiers emitted as a result of dynamic tag proto
> changes), but the normal driver teardown code path wasn't replaced with
> anything.
>
> Solve this problem by adding a function that does the opposite of
> dsa_switch_setup_tag_protocol(), which is called from the equivalent
> spot in dsa_switch_teardown(). The positioning here also ensures that we
> won't have any use-after-free in tagging protocol (*rcv) ops, since the
> teardown sequence is as follows:
>
> dsa_tree_teardown
> -> dsa_tree_teardown_master
> -> dsa_master_teardown
> -> unsets master->dsa_ptr, making no further packets match the
> ETH_P_XDSA packet type handler
> -> dsa_tree_teardown_ports
> -> dsa_port_teardown
> -> dsa_slave_destroy
> -> unregisters DSA net devices, there is even a synchronize_net()
> in unregister_netdevice_many()
> -> dsa_tree_teardown_switches
> -> dsa_switch_teardown
> -> dsa_switch_teardown_tag_protocol
> -> finally frees the tagger-owned storage
>
> Fixes: 7f2973149c22 ("net: dsa: make tagging protocols connect to individual switches from a tree")
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: don't leak tagger-owned storage on switch driver unbind
2022-11-14 14:35 [PATCH net] net: dsa: don't leak tagger-owned storage on switch driver unbind Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-15 21:57 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-11-15 22:52 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2022-11-16 5:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2022-11-16 5:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vladimir Oltean
Cc: netdev, andrew, f.fainelli, olteanv, davem, edumazet, kuba,
pabeni
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (master)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 16:35:51 +0200 you wrote:
> In the initial commit dc452a471dba ("net: dsa: introduce tagger-owned
> storage for private and shared data"), we had a call to
> tag_ops->disconnect(dst) issued from dsa_tree_free(), which is called at
> tree teardown time.
>
> There were problems with connecting to a switch tree as a whole, so this
> got reworked to connecting to individual switches within the tree. In
> this process, tag_ops->disconnect(ds) was made to be called only from
> switch.c (cross-chip notifiers emitted as a result of dynamic tag proto
> changes), but the normal driver teardown code path wasn't replaced with
> anything.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net] net: dsa: don't leak tagger-owned storage on switch driver unbind
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/4e0c19fcb8b5
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-11-16 5:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-11-14 14:35 [PATCH net] net: dsa: don't leak tagger-owned storage on switch driver unbind Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-15 21:57 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-11-15 22:52 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-11-16 5:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.