From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Revert "staging: mmal-vchiq: Avoid use of bool in structures"
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 11:35:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3dD6Lg2L7CgkDFe@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y3bN8I7DlxRUZumH@lunn.ch>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 01:12:32AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
> Does :1 really initialise the variable?
Obviously not.
> In "u32 enabled:1" it means
> this is a 1 bit wide bit field. It seems odd that bool is somehow
> special and :1 means something else.
If you have a bunch of consecutive bool a:1; bool b:1; then GCC will
squeeze them into the same byte. But if you have bool a; bool b; then
they each take a byte with GCC. I have specified GCC because the size
of bool types are a bit vague in the C standard.
regards,
dan carpenter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Revert "staging: mmal-vchiq: Avoid use of bool in structures"
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 11:35:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3dD6Lg2L7CgkDFe@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y3bN8I7DlxRUZumH@lunn.ch>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 01:12:32AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
> Does :1 really initialise the variable?
Obviously not.
> In "u32 enabled:1" it means
> this is a 1 bit wide bit field. It seems odd that bool is somehow
> special and :1 means something else.
If you have a bunch of consecutive bool a:1; bool b:1; then GCC will
squeeze them into the same byte. But if you have bool a; bool b; then
they each take a byte with GCC. I have specified GCC because the size
of bool types are a bit vague in the C standard.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-18 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-17 16:00 [PATCH 0/3] vc04_services: Promote bool usage Umang Jain
2022-11-17 16:00 ` Umang Jain
2022-11-17 16:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] Revert "staging: mmal-vchiq: Avoid use of bool in structures" Umang Jain
2022-11-17 16:00 ` Umang Jain
2022-11-17 16:09 ` Kieran Bingham
2022-11-17 16:09 ` Kieran Bingham
2022-11-17 17:55 ` Umang Jain
2022-11-17 17:55 ` Umang Jain
2022-11-17 18:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-11-17 18:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-11-17 18:22 ` Umang Jain
2022-11-17 18:22 ` Umang Jain
2022-11-18 0:12 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-11-18 0:12 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-11-18 3:58 ` Umang Jain
2022-11-18 3:58 ` Umang Jain
2022-11-18 8:35 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2022-11-18 8:35 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-11-17 16:00 ` [PATCH 2/3] vc04_services: mmal-vchiq: Use bool for vchiq_mmal_component.in_use Umang Jain
2022-11-17 16:00 ` Umang Jain
2022-11-18 0:23 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-11-18 0:23 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-11-18 9:01 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-11-18 9:01 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-11-17 16:00 ` [PATCH 3/3] vc04_services: bcm2835-camera: Use bool values for mmal_fmt.remove_padding Umang Jain
2022-11-17 16:00 ` Umang Jain
2022-11-17 18:11 ` [PATCH 0/3] vc04_services: Promote bool usage Stefan Wahren
2022-11-17 18:11 ` Stefan Wahren
2022-11-18 8:47 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-11-18 8:47 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-11-18 17:25 ` Dave Stevenson
2022-11-18 17:25 ` Dave Stevenson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3dD6Lg2L7CgkDFe@kadam \
--to=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
--cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
--cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
--cc=umang.jain@ideasonboard.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.