From: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
balbi@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: gadget: f_hid: Conduct proper refcounting on shared f_hidg pointer
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 16:37:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3e0zAa7+HiNVrKN@donbot> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y3er7nenAhbmBdBy@rowland.harvard.edu>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 10:59:42AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 08:54:53AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022, Alan Stern wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 01:46:26PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022, Greg KH wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 12:08:13PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > > +static inline bool f_hidg_is_open(struct f_hidg *hidg)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + return !!kref_read(&hidg->cdev.kobj.kref);
> > > > > > +}
> > > > >
> > > > > Ick, sorry, no, that's not going to work and is not allowed at all.
> > > > > That's some major layering violations there, AND it can change after you
> > > > > get the value as well.
> > > >
> > > > This cdev belongs solely to this driver. Hence the *.*.* and not
> > > > *->*->*. What is preventing us from reading our own data? If we
> > > > cannot do this directly, can I create an API to do it 'officially'?
> > > >
> > > > I do, however, appreciate that a little locking wouldn't go amiss.
> > > >
> > > > If this solution is not acceptable either, then we're left up the
> > > > creak without a paddle. The rules you've communicated are not
> > > > compatible with each other.
> > > >
> > > > Rule 1: Only one item in a data structure can reference count.
> > > >
> > > > Due to the embedded cdev struct, this rules out my first solution of
> > > > giving f_hidg its own kref so that it can conduct its own life-time
> > > > management.
> > > >
> > > > A potential option to satisfy this rule would be to remove the cdev
> > > > attribute and create its data dynamically instead. However, the
> > > > staticness of cdev is used to obtain f_hidg (with container_of()) in
> > > > the character device handling component, so it cannot be removed.
> > >
> > > You have not understood this rule correctly. Only one item in a data
> > > structure can hold a reference count _for that structure_. But several
> > > items in a structure can hold reference counts for themselves.
> >
> > Here was the review comment I was working to on this patch [0]:
> >
> > "While at first glance, it seems that f_hidg is not reference
> > counted, it really is, with the embedded "struct cdev" a few lines
> > above this.
> >
> > That is the reference count that should control the lifecycle of
> > this object, not another reference here in the "outer layer"
> > structure."
>
> It's worth noting that the review comment goes on to say:
>
> "But, the cdev api is tricky and messy and not really set up to control
> the lifecycle of objects it is embedded in."
>
> This is a good indication that a separate reference counter really is
> needed (in fact it almost contradicts what was written above).
I don't think it's at all simple to fix this - I posted a series
addressing the lifetime issues here a few years ago but didn't chase it
up and there was no feedback:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20191028114228.3679219-1-john@metanate.com/
That includes a patch to remove the embedded struct cdev and manage its
lifetime separately, which I think is needed as there are two different
struct device objects here and we cannot tie their lifetimes together.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-18 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-17 12:08 [PATCH 1/1] usb: gadget: f_hid: Conduct proper refcounting on shared f_hidg pointer Lee Jones
2022-11-17 12:50 ` Greg KH
2022-11-17 13:26 ` Lee Jones
2022-11-17 17:38 ` Greg KH
2022-11-17 12:50 ` Greg KH
2022-11-17 13:46 ` Lee Jones
2022-11-17 16:47 ` Alan Stern
2022-11-18 8:54 ` Lee Jones
2022-11-18 15:59 ` Alan Stern
2022-11-18 16:37 ` John Keeping [this message]
2022-11-18 21:07 ` Alan Stern
2022-11-20 17:22 ` John Keeping
2022-11-20 20:46 ` Alan Stern
2022-11-21 12:30 ` Lee Jones
2022-11-21 12:38 ` John Keeping
2022-11-21 16:18 ` Alan Stern
2022-11-21 18:54 ` John Keeping
2022-11-21 19:17 ` Alan Stern
2022-11-22 11:52 ` John Keeping
2022-11-22 8:31 ` Lee Jones
2022-11-22 11:55 ` John Keeping
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-10-17 11:27 Lee Jones
2022-10-22 12:52 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-10-24 7:17 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3e0zAa7+HiNVrKN@donbot \
--to=john@metanate.com \
--cc=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.