From: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@ti.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: <vigneshr@ti.com>, <robh@kernel.org>, <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
<linus.walleij@linaro.org>, <lee@kernel.org>, <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] Documentation: ti,tps6594: Add DT bindings for the TPS6594x PMIC
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:23:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3haUxShWtA4x8dy@ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b46253e0-6678-0a69-1522-83a559835669@linaro.org>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 11:21:57AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 18/11/2022 10:22, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> > Add documentation for the TPS6594x PMIC including its RTC and GPIO
> > functionalities.
> >
>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>
> It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
> feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
> Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
> requested changes or keep discussing them.
>
I missed serveral feedback suggestions in the last revision. Will try to be
a little more careful in the future.
> Thank you.
>
> The comment was about proper subject prefix. Drop also redundant, second
> "DT bindings" from the subject.
>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@ti.com>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps6594.yaml | 65 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps6594.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps6594.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps6594.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..81613bcef39d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps6594.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/ti,tps6594x.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: TPS6594x Power Management Integrated Circuit (PMIC)
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + enum:
> > + - ti,tps6594
>
> tps6594 is the model name? So what was previous tps6594x used also in
> title? This does not look correct.
>
So the actual part number is TPS6594-Q1. Would tps6594q1 be more concise
for naming across the device tree, and drivers?
- Matt
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + const: 0x48
> > +
> > + ti,system-power-controller:
> > + type: boolean
> > + description: PMIC is controlling the system power.
> > +
> > + rtc:
> > + type: object
> > + $ref: /schemas/rtc/rtc.yaml#
> > + unevaluatedProperties: false
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + const: ti,tps6594-rtc
>
> Same problem.
>
> > +
> > + gpio:
> > + type: object
> > + unevaluatedProperties: false
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + const: ti,tps6594x-gpio
>
>
> Not fixed.
>
>
>
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - reg
> > +
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + i2c0 {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + pmic: pmic@48 {
> > + compatible = "ti,tps6594";
> > + reg = <0x48>;
> > +
> > + rtc {
> > + compatible = "ti,tps6594-rtc";
> > + };
> > +
> > + gpio {
> > + compatible = "ti,tps6594-gpio";
>
> Does not look like you tested the bindings. Please run `make
> dt_binding_check` (see
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst for instructions).
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@ti.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: <vigneshr@ti.com>, <robh@kernel.org>, <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
<linus.walleij@linaro.org>, <lee@kernel.org>, <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] Documentation: ti,tps6594: Add DT bindings for the TPS6594x PMIC
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:23:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3haUxShWtA4x8dy@ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b46253e0-6678-0a69-1522-83a559835669@linaro.org>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 11:21:57AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 18/11/2022 10:22, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> > Add documentation for the TPS6594x PMIC including its RTC and GPIO
> > functionalities.
> >
>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>
> It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
> feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
> Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
> requested changes or keep discussing them.
>
I missed serveral feedback suggestions in the last revision. Will try to be
a little more careful in the future.
> Thank you.
>
> The comment was about proper subject prefix. Drop also redundant, second
> "DT bindings" from the subject.
>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@ti.com>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps6594.yaml | 65 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps6594.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps6594.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps6594.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..81613bcef39d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps6594.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/ti,tps6594x.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: TPS6594x Power Management Integrated Circuit (PMIC)
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + enum:
> > + - ti,tps6594
>
> tps6594 is the model name? So what was previous tps6594x used also in
> title? This does not look correct.
>
So the actual part number is TPS6594-Q1. Would tps6594q1 be more concise
for naming across the device tree, and drivers?
- Matt
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + const: 0x48
> > +
> > + ti,system-power-controller:
> > + type: boolean
> > + description: PMIC is controlling the system power.
> > +
> > + rtc:
> > + type: object
> > + $ref: /schemas/rtc/rtc.yaml#
> > + unevaluatedProperties: false
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + const: ti,tps6594-rtc
>
> Same problem.
>
> > +
> > + gpio:
> > + type: object
> > + unevaluatedProperties: false
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + const: ti,tps6594x-gpio
>
>
> Not fixed.
>
>
>
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - reg
> > +
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + i2c0 {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + pmic: pmic@48 {
> > + compatible = "ti,tps6594";
> > + reg = <0x48>;
> > +
> > + rtc {
> > + compatible = "ti,tps6594-rtc";
> > + };
> > +
> > + gpio {
> > + compatible = "ti,tps6594-gpio";
>
> Does not look like you tested the bindings. Please run `make
> dt_binding_check` (see
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst for instructions).
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-19 4:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-18 9:22 [PATCH v4 0/4] mfd: add tps6594x support for Jacinto platforms Matt Ranostay
2022-11-18 9:22 ` Matt Ranostay
2022-11-18 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] Documentation: ti,tps6594: Add DT bindings for the TPS6594x PMIC Matt Ranostay
2022-11-18 9:22 ` Matt Ranostay
2022-11-18 10:21 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-11-18 10:21 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-11-19 4:23 ` Matt Ranostay [this message]
2022-11-19 4:23 ` Matt Ranostay
2022-11-18 13:31 ` Rob Herring
2022-11-18 13:31 ` Rob Herring
2022-11-18 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] MFD: TPS6594x: Add new PMIC device driver for TPS6594x chips Matt Ranostay
2022-11-18 9:22 ` Matt Ranostay
2022-11-18 10:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-11-18 10:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-11-19 4:17 ` Matt Ranostay
2022-11-19 4:17 ` Matt Ranostay
2022-11-18 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] rtc: rtc-tps6594x: Add support for TPS6594X PMIC RTC Matt Ranostay
2022-11-18 9:22 ` Matt Ranostay
2022-11-18 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] gpio: gpio-tps6594x: add GPIO support for TPS6594x PMIC Matt Ranostay
2022-11-18 9:22 ` Matt Ranostay
2022-11-28 18:08 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-11-28 18:08 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-11-28 20:38 ` Linus Walleij
2022-11-28 20:38 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3haUxShWtA4x8dy@ubuntu \
--to=mranostay@ti.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.