From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] IB/qib: don't use qib_wc_x86_64 for UML
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 11:22:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y4hyPPzyQiI3i9jh@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221130200945.24459-1-rdunlap@infradead.org>
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 12:09:45PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> When building qib_wc_x86_64.c on ARCH=um, references to some cpuinfo
> fields cause build errors since cpuinfo does not contain x86-specific
> fields.
>
> Fix the build errors by making this driver depend on !UML.
>
> Prevents these build errors:
>
> ../drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_wc_x86_64.c: In function ‘qib_unordered_wc’:
> ../drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_wc_x86_64.c:149:29: error: ‘struct cpuinfo_um’ has no member named ‘x86_vendor’
> 149 | return boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD;
> ../drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_wc_x86_64.c:149:44: error: ‘X86_VENDOR_AMD’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘X86_VENDOR_ANY’?
> 149 | return boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD;
> ../drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_wc_x86_64.c:149:44: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> ../drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_wc_x86_64.c:150:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
> 150 | }
>
> Fixes: 68f5d3f3b654 ("um: add PCI over virtio emulation driver")
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com>
> Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
> Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>
> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org
> ---
> v2: rebase & resend
>
> drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff -- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ config INFINIBAND_QIB
> tristate "Intel PCIe HCA support"
> depends on 64BIT && INFINIBAND_RDMAVT
> depends on PCI
> + depends on !UML
I would advocate to add this line to whole drivers/infiniband.
None of RDMA code makes sense for UML.
Thanks
> help
> This is a low-level driver for Intel PCIe QLE InfiniBand host
> channel adapters. This driver does not support the Intel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] IB/qib: don't use qib_wc_x86_64 for UML
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 11:22:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y4hyPPzyQiI3i9jh@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221130200945.24459-1-rdunlap@infradead.org>
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 12:09:45PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> When building qib_wc_x86_64.c on ARCH=um, references to some cpuinfo
> fields cause build errors since cpuinfo does not contain x86-specific
> fields.
>
> Fix the build errors by making this driver depend on !UML.
>
> Prevents these build errors:
>
> ../drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_wc_x86_64.c: In function ‘qib_unordered_wc’:
> ../drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_wc_x86_64.c:149:29: error: ‘struct cpuinfo_um’ has no member named ‘x86_vendor’
> 149 | return boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD;
> ../drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_wc_x86_64.c:149:44: error: ‘X86_VENDOR_AMD’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘X86_VENDOR_ANY’?
> 149 | return boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD;
> ../drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_wc_x86_64.c:149:44: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> ../drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_wc_x86_64.c:150:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
> 150 | }
>
> Fixes: 68f5d3f3b654 ("um: add PCI over virtio emulation driver")
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com>
> Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
> Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>
> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org
> ---
> v2: rebase & resend
>
> drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff -- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ config INFINIBAND_QIB
> tristate "Intel PCIe HCA support"
> depends on 64BIT && INFINIBAND_RDMAVT
> depends on PCI
> + depends on !UML
I would advocate to add this line to whole drivers/infiniband.
None of RDMA code makes sense for UML.
Thanks
> help
> This is a low-level driver for Intel PCIe QLE InfiniBand host
> channel adapters. This driver does not support the Intel
_______________________________________________
linux-um mailing list
linux-um@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-01 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-30 20:09 [PATCH 1/2 v2] IB/qib: don't use qib_wc_x86_64 for UML Randy Dunlap
2022-11-30 20:09 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-12-01 9:22 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2022-12-01 9:22 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-12-01 9:28 ` Richard Weinberger
2022-12-01 9:28 ` Richard Weinberger
2022-12-01 9:28 ` Johannes Berg
2022-12-01 9:28 ` Johannes Berg
2022-12-01 10:12 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-12-01 10:12 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-12-01 17:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-01 17:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-01 18:05 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-12-01 18:05 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y4hyPPzyQiI3i9jh@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
--cc=dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.