From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Cc: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
amit.pundir@linaro.org, andersson@kernel.org,
sumit.semwal@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: dma: Drop cache invalidation from arch_dma_prep_coherent()"
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 17:45:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y4joR2sQMMjIt+yE@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6d637906-e1d5-c481-a73d-2b2b845e223b@leemhuis.info>
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 10:29:39AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Has any progress been made to fix this regression? It afaics is not a
> release critical issue, but well, it still would be nice to get this
> fixed before 6.1 is released.
The only (nearly) risk-free "fix" for 6.1 would be to revert the commit
that exposed the driver bug. It doesn't fix the actual bug, it only
makes it less likely to happen.
I like the original commit removing the cache invalidation as it shows
drivers not behaving properly but, as a workaround, we could add a
command line option to force back the old behaviour (defaulting to the
new one) until the driver is fixed.
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Cc: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
amit.pundir@linaro.org, andersson@kernel.org,
sumit.semwal@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: dma: Drop cache invalidation from arch_dma_prep_coherent()"
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 17:45:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y4joR2sQMMjIt+yE@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6d637906-e1d5-c481-a73d-2b2b845e223b@leemhuis.info>
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 10:29:39AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Has any progress been made to fix this regression? It afaics is not a
> release critical issue, but well, it still would be nice to get this
> fixed before 6.1 is released.
The only (nearly) risk-free "fix" for 6.1 would be to revert the commit
that exposed the driver bug. It doesn't fix the actual bug, it only
makes it less likely to happen.
I like the original commit removing the cache invalidation as it shows
drivers not behaving properly but, as a workaround, we could add a
command line option to force back the old behaviour (defaulting to the
new one) until the driver is fixed.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-01 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-14 11:03 [PATCH] Revert "arm64: dma: Drop cache invalidation from arch_dma_prep_coherent()" Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-11-14 11:03 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-11-14 11:29 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-11-14 11:29 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-11-14 14:11 ` Will Deacon
2022-11-14 14:11 ` Will Deacon
2022-11-14 15:14 ` Robin Murphy
2022-11-14 15:14 ` Robin Murphy
2022-11-14 17:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-11-14 17:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-11-18 10:54 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-11-18 10:54 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-11-18 12:33 ` Will Deacon
2022-11-18 12:33 ` Will Deacon
2022-11-21 6:42 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-11-21 6:42 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-11-21 10:12 ` Sibi Sankar
2022-11-21 10:12 ` Sibi Sankar
2022-11-24 11:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-11-24 11:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-12-01 9:29 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-12-01 9:29 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-12-01 17:45 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2022-12-01 17:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-12-02 8:26 ` Amit Pundir
2022-12-02 8:26 ` Amit Pundir
2022-12-02 8:54 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-12-02 8:54 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-12-02 10:03 ` Will Deacon
2022-12-02 10:03 ` Will Deacon
2022-12-02 10:34 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-12-02 10:34 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-12-02 16:10 ` Greg KH
2022-12-02 16:10 ` Greg KH
2022-12-02 16:27 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-12-02 16:27 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-12-02 16:32 ` Greg KH
2022-12-02 16:32 ` Greg KH
2022-12-02 17:14 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-02 17:14 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-05 14:24 ` Will Deacon
2022-12-05 14:24 ` Will Deacon
2022-12-06 9:21 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-06 9:21 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-06 9:58 ` Will Deacon
2022-12-06 9:58 ` Will Deacon
2022-12-02 10:54 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-02 10:54 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-11-28 5:44 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-11-28 5:44 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-11-28 8:15 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-11-28 8:15 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-08 4:59 ` Leonard Lausen
2022-12-08 4:59 ` Leonard Lausen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-12-06 10:34 Will Deacon
2022-12-06 11:24 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-06 17:50 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y4joR2sQMMjIt+yE@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=amit.pundir@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=quic_sibis@quicinc.com \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.