From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/11] RISC-V: KVM: Improve privilege mode filtering for perf
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 20:17:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5uA8CEoTKzIGoSy@dizzy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221215170046.2010255-6-atishp@rivosinc.com>
Hey Atish,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 09:00:40AM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> RISC-V: KVM: Improve privilege mode filtering for perf
I almost marked this as "not applicable" in patchwork as I was mislead
by the $subject. I know our perf driver is a real mixed bag, but should
it not be something more like:
"perf: RISC-V: Improve privilege mode filtering for KVM"?
It was only when I noticed that the rest of the series had been marked
as "Handled Elsewhere" that I realised that this must not be a KVM patch
;)
Thanks,
Conor
> Currently, the host driver doesn't have any method to identify if the
> requested perf event is from kvm or bare metal. As KVM runs in HS
> mode, there are no separate hypervisor privilege mode to distinguish
> between the attributes for guest/host.
>
> Improve the privilege mode filtering by using the event specific
> config1 field.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> index 65d4aa4..df795b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> @@ -298,6 +298,27 @@ int riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info(u32 *hw_ctr_width, u32 *num_hw_ctr)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info);
>
> +static unsigned long pmu_sbi_get_filter_flags(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + unsigned long cflags = 0;
> + bool guest_events = false;
> +
> + if (event->attr.config1 & RISCV_KVM_PMU_CONFIG1_GUEST_EVENTS)
> + guest_events = true;
> + if (event->attr.exclude_kernel)
> + cflags |= guest_events ? SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_VSINH : SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_SINH;
> + if (event->attr.exclude_user)
> + cflags |= guest_events ? SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_VUINH : SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_UINH;
> + if (guest_events && event->attr.exclude_hv)
> + cflags |= SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_SINH;
> + if (event->attr.exclude_host)
> + cflags |= SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_UINH | SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_SINH;
> + if (event->attr.exclude_guest)
> + cflags |= SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_VSINH | SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_VUINH;
> +
> + return cflags;
> +}
> +
> static int pmu_sbi_ctr_get_idx(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> @@ -308,11 +329,7 @@ static int pmu_sbi_ctr_get_idx(struct perf_event *event)
> uint64_t cbase = 0;
> unsigned long cflags = 0;
>
> - if (event->attr.exclude_kernel)
> - cflags |= SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_SINH;
> - if (event->attr.exclude_user)
> - cflags |= SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_UINH;
> -
> + cflags = pmu_sbi_get_filter_flags(event);
> /* retrieve the available counter index */
> #if defined(CONFIG_32BIT)
> ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_CFG_MATCH, cbase,
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
> index a1c3f77..1c42146 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
>
> #define RISCV_PMU_STOP_FLAG_RESET 1
>
> +#define RISCV_KVM_PMU_CONFIG1_GUEST_EVENTS 0x1
> +
> struct cpu_hw_events {
> /* currently enabled events */
> int n_events;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kvm-riscv/attachments/20221215/0c08422f/attachment-0001.sig>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Sergey Matyukevich <sergey.matyukevich@syntacore.com>,
Eric Lin <eric.lin@sifive.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] RISC-V: KVM: Improve privilege mode filtering for perf
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 20:17:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5uA8CEoTKzIGoSy@dizzy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221215170046.2010255-6-atishp@rivosinc.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3377 bytes --]
Hey Atish,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 09:00:40AM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> RISC-V: KVM: Improve privilege mode filtering for perf
I almost marked this as "not applicable" in patchwork as I was mislead
by the $subject. I know our perf driver is a real mixed bag, but should
it not be something more like:
"perf: RISC-V: Improve privilege mode filtering for KVM"?
It was only when I noticed that the rest of the series had been marked
as "Handled Elsewhere" that I realised that this must not be a KVM patch
;)
Thanks,
Conor
> Currently, the host driver doesn't have any method to identify if the
> requested perf event is from kvm or bare metal. As KVM runs in HS
> mode, there are no separate hypervisor privilege mode to distinguish
> between the attributes for guest/host.
>
> Improve the privilege mode filtering by using the event specific
> config1 field.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> index 65d4aa4..df795b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> @@ -298,6 +298,27 @@ int riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info(u32 *hw_ctr_width, u32 *num_hw_ctr)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info);
>
> +static unsigned long pmu_sbi_get_filter_flags(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + unsigned long cflags = 0;
> + bool guest_events = false;
> +
> + if (event->attr.config1 & RISCV_KVM_PMU_CONFIG1_GUEST_EVENTS)
> + guest_events = true;
> + if (event->attr.exclude_kernel)
> + cflags |= guest_events ? SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_VSINH : SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_SINH;
> + if (event->attr.exclude_user)
> + cflags |= guest_events ? SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_VUINH : SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_UINH;
> + if (guest_events && event->attr.exclude_hv)
> + cflags |= SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_SINH;
> + if (event->attr.exclude_host)
> + cflags |= SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_UINH | SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_SINH;
> + if (event->attr.exclude_guest)
> + cflags |= SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_VSINH | SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_VUINH;
> +
> + return cflags;
> +}
> +
> static int pmu_sbi_ctr_get_idx(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> @@ -308,11 +329,7 @@ static int pmu_sbi_ctr_get_idx(struct perf_event *event)
> uint64_t cbase = 0;
> unsigned long cflags = 0;
>
> - if (event->attr.exclude_kernel)
> - cflags |= SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_SINH;
> - if (event->attr.exclude_user)
> - cflags |= SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_UINH;
> -
> + cflags = pmu_sbi_get_filter_flags(event);
> /* retrieve the available counter index */
> #if defined(CONFIG_32BIT)
> ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_CFG_MATCH, cbase,
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
> index a1c3f77..1c42146 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
>
> #define RISCV_PMU_STOP_FLAG_RESET 1
>
> +#define RISCV_KVM_PMU_CONFIG1_GUEST_EVENTS 0x1
> +
> struct cpu_hw_events {
> /* currently enabled events */
> int n_events;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Sergey Matyukevich <sergey.matyukevich@syntacore.com>,
Eric Lin <eric.lin@sifive.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] RISC-V: KVM: Improve privilege mode filtering for perf
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 20:17:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5uA8CEoTKzIGoSy@dizzy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221215170046.2010255-6-atishp@rivosinc.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3377 bytes --]
Hey Atish,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 09:00:40AM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> RISC-V: KVM: Improve privilege mode filtering for perf
I almost marked this as "not applicable" in patchwork as I was mislead
by the $subject. I know our perf driver is a real mixed bag, but should
it not be something more like:
"perf: RISC-V: Improve privilege mode filtering for KVM"?
It was only when I noticed that the rest of the series had been marked
as "Handled Elsewhere" that I realised that this must not be a KVM patch
;)
Thanks,
Conor
> Currently, the host driver doesn't have any method to identify if the
> requested perf event is from kvm or bare metal. As KVM runs in HS
> mode, there are no separate hypervisor privilege mode to distinguish
> between the attributes for guest/host.
>
> Improve the privilege mode filtering by using the event specific
> config1 field.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> index 65d4aa4..df795b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> @@ -298,6 +298,27 @@ int riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info(u32 *hw_ctr_width, u32 *num_hw_ctr)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info);
>
> +static unsigned long pmu_sbi_get_filter_flags(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + unsigned long cflags = 0;
> + bool guest_events = false;
> +
> + if (event->attr.config1 & RISCV_KVM_PMU_CONFIG1_GUEST_EVENTS)
> + guest_events = true;
> + if (event->attr.exclude_kernel)
> + cflags |= guest_events ? SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_VSINH : SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_SINH;
> + if (event->attr.exclude_user)
> + cflags |= guest_events ? SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_VUINH : SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_UINH;
> + if (guest_events && event->attr.exclude_hv)
> + cflags |= SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_SINH;
> + if (event->attr.exclude_host)
> + cflags |= SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_UINH | SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_SINH;
> + if (event->attr.exclude_guest)
> + cflags |= SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_VSINH | SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_VUINH;
> +
> + return cflags;
> +}
> +
> static int pmu_sbi_ctr_get_idx(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> @@ -308,11 +329,7 @@ static int pmu_sbi_ctr_get_idx(struct perf_event *event)
> uint64_t cbase = 0;
> unsigned long cflags = 0;
>
> - if (event->attr.exclude_kernel)
> - cflags |= SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_SINH;
> - if (event->attr.exclude_user)
> - cflags |= SBI_PMU_CFG_FLAG_SET_UINH;
> -
> + cflags = pmu_sbi_get_filter_flags(event);
> /* retrieve the available counter index */
> #if defined(CONFIG_32BIT)
> ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_CFG_MATCH, cbase,
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
> index a1c3f77..1c42146 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
>
> #define RISCV_PMU_STOP_FLAG_RESET 1
>
> +#define RISCV_KVM_PMU_CONFIG1_GUEST_EVENTS 0x1
> +
> struct cpu_hw_events {
> /* currently enabled events */
> int n_events;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-15 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 111+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-15 17:00 [PATCH v2 00/11] KVM perf support Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] RISC-V: Define helper functions expose hpm counter width and count Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-12 10:06 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 10:06 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 10:06 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 18:18 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2023-01-12 18:18 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2023-01-12 18:18 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2023-01-13 7:22 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-13 7:22 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-13 7:22 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-24 20:41 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-24 20:41 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-24 20:41 ` Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] RISC-V: KVM: Define a probe function for SBI extension data structures Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-12 10:21 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 10:21 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 10:21 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 18:19 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2023-01-12 18:19 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2023-01-12 18:19 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] RISC-V: KVM: Return correct code for hsm stop function Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-12 10:28 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 10:28 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 10:28 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 18:25 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2023-01-12 18:25 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2023-01-12 18:25 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2023-01-13 7:25 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-13 7:25 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-13 7:25 ` Andrew Jones
2022-12-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] RISC-V: KVM: Modify SBI extension handler to return SBI error code Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-12 11:04 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 11:04 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 11:04 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 18:47 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2023-01-12 18:47 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2023-01-12 18:47 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2023-01-13 7:42 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-13 7:42 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-13 7:42 ` Andrew Jones
2022-12-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] RISC-V: KVM: Improve privilege mode filtering for perf Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2022-12-15 20:17 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2022-12-15 20:17 ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-15 20:17 ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-15 21:10 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2022-12-15 21:10 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2022-12-15 21:10 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] RISC-V: KVM: Add skeleton support " Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-12 15:10 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 15:10 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 15:10 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 18:09 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2023-01-12 18:09 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2023-01-12 18:09 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] RISC-V: KVM: Add SBI PMU extension support Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-12 15:29 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 15:29 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 15:29 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 18:04 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2023-01-12 18:04 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2023-01-12 18:04 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] RISC-V: KVM: Disable all hpmcounter access for VS/VU mode Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-12 15:47 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 15:47 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 15:47 ` Andrew Jones
2022-12-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] RISC-V: KVM: Implement trap & emulate for hpmcounters Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-13 11:47 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-13 11:47 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-13 11:47 ` Andrew Jones
2022-12-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] RISC-V: KVM: Implement perf support without sampling Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-13 11:45 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-13 11:45 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-13 11:45 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-23 7:23 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-23 7:23 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-23 7:23 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-26 0:50 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-26 0:50 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-26 0:50 ` Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] RISC-V: KVM: Implement firmware events Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-13 12:08 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-13 12:08 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-13 12:08 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-26 3:08 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-26 3:08 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-26 3:08 ` Atish Patra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y5uA8CEoTKzIGoSy@dizzy \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.